Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
CRJ turbulence damage in MEM >

CRJ turbulence damage in MEM

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

CRJ turbulence damage in MEM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2009 | 03:15 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

You guys sure that about Flightware history . My son was going into BNA a few days ago and complained about a lot of turbulence and lighting in a TRW. The A/C then diverted into BHM...i check the flight out using Flightware it it looks like somebody drove him through a line...nice
Reply
Old 06-15-2009 | 03:33 PM
  #62  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 122
Default

The radar on Flightaware does not accurately represent the actual weather an airplane works its way through along a flight.

There have been more times than I can count when, after landing, it shows me having gone head-long through a long line of weather when I was 40 miles in front and paralleling it.
Reply
Old 06-16-2009 | 04:12 AM
  #63  
bertengineer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Front
Default

I used to fly for PEANUCKLE before I grew up and got a real job. I heard this about a month ago on the radios..

Center: "Flagship slow to 250"

Flagship: "Ah, center stand-by, we have to get the books out for that one"

Center: "Flagship, are you saying you cannot fly 250?"

Flagship: "Sir, we have to see if we can fly that slow in the books!"


No kidding!
Way to sound professional Flagship, by the way, what is your recommended holding speed above 15000ft IAW the FOM, 225 knots? Also you could use Ref + 40 to figure out slowest speed, keeping within the stall margins...something like that?
Reply
Old 06-16-2009 | 06:15 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by bertengineer
I used to fly for PEANUCKLE before I grew up and got a real job. I heard this about a month ago on the radios..

Center: "Flagship slow to 250"

Flagship: "Ah, center stand-by, we have to get the books out for that one"

Center: "Flagship, are you saying you cannot fly 250?"

Flagship: "Sir, we have to see if we can fly that slow in the books!"


No kidding!
Way to sound professional Flagship, by the way, what is your recommended holding speed above 15000ft IAW the FOM, 225 knots? Also you could use Ref + 40 to figure out slowest speed, keeping within the stall margins...something like that?
dont believe it. but i am glad to see you have moved on to your greener pastures. congratulations to both of us.
Reply
Old 06-16-2009 | 06:44 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bertengineer
I used to fly for PEANUCKLE before I grew up and got a real job. I heard this about a month ago on the radios..

Center: "Flagship slow to 250"

Flagship: "Ah, center stand-by, we have to get the books out for that one"

Center: "Flagship, are you saying you cannot fly 250?"

Flagship: "Sir, we have to see if we can fly that slow in the books!"


No kidding!
Way to sound professional Flagship, by the way, what is your recommended holding speed above 15000ft IAW the FOM, 225 knots? Also you could use Ref + 40 to figure out slowest speed, keeping within the stall margins...something like that?
no internet tough guy.....per FOM/cfm you can only fly in cruise .70 or LRC, whichever is less.
Reply
Old 06-16-2009 | 07:26 AM
  #66  
John Pennekamp's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
I haven't had too much problem with the EMB radar (8000+ hours). At first, I felt it had some issues, but the only issue that remain is its greater susceptability for attenuation. In anything greater then light precip, its effectiveness is greatly reduced more so then mainline aircraft with larger antennas. but that's to be expected.

I've had little problem using it effectively out to 50 miles which is enough for planning. Even very large returns can be identified farther, but ground clutter due to tilt and downward slope of the signal requires understanding.
FWIW, I was referring to the CRJ. Never flown an ERJ/EMB (other than the Brakillya, which had an awesome radar).
Reply
Old 06-16-2009 | 07:28 AM
  #67  
John Pennekamp's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport
if that is how you are using the radar you are using it incorrectly. at fl300 the radar should almost always be in the negative tilt. the crj radar is actually pretty good, you just have to know how to use it.

the correct way to use the radar on the crj 200 is as follows.

choose a distance you want to use. the 80-160 is not very effective but
still can be used to see larger items further away.

the best distances are the 20-40 or the 40-80.

the way to use the radar is set the distance you want to look at. then tilt the radar down till you begin to paint ground and you can see a fairly solid green arc at the furthest distance on your screen. once you have established a good ground paint arc then you can begin to watch for weather. the ground arc should stay at the same distance at all times unless you adjust the tilt again. ANYTHING that comes out of the ground arc you have been painting and comes closer to the plane is an area of weather and thunderstorms. you also at the higher altitudes want to point the tilt down a little more than normal. the crj doesn't pic up frozen precip so at the higher altitudes it wont paint storms unless you are pointing down below the freezing level.

so in review.

Point radar so that you get a good solid arc of ground clutter at the furthest distance for the range you have chosen. the ground clutter should stay the exact same distance from you.

If something moves closer to you out of the ground clutter it is an area of weather and should be avoided.
Thank you professor! In my 8000 hours (3000 in a CRJ) I think I have a good grasp of how to use radar! I paint ground at 80 miles and +2. if you tilt it above that, you still see nothing.

If you point the radar to -2 at FL300 all you see is the ground more than 20 miles out. That's as useless as your advice. Let me know when you get typed on the plane.
Reply
Old 06-16-2009 | 07:34 AM
  #68  
John Pennekamp's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Default

Originally Posted by IBPilot
no internet tough guy.....per FOM/cfm you can only fly in cruise .70 or LRC, whichever is less.
That's asinine. We fly our CRJs at .65 all the time in accordance with our ECON SPEED (ACARS fuel saving program). It isn't going to fall out of the sky below .70!!!
Reply
Old 06-16-2009 | 07:35 AM
  #69  
John Pennekamp's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Default

Originally Posted by bertengineer
I used to fly for PEANUCKLE before I grew up and got a real job. I heard this about a month ago on the radios..

Center: "Flagship slow to 250"

Flagship: "Ah, center stand-by, we have to get the books out for that one"

Center: "Flagship, are you saying you cannot fly 250?"

Flagship: "Sir, we have to see if we can fly that slow in the books!"


No kidding!
Way to sound professional Flagship, by the way, what is your recommended holding speed above 15000ft IAW the FOM, 225 knots? Also you could use Ref + 40 to figure out slowest speed, keeping within the stall margins...something like that?
I believe it. Since Flagship moved into ATL, I've heard some stuff on the radio that blew me away. And I've actually heard similar conversations to the above on the ERLIN arrival.
Reply
Old 06-16-2009 | 07:58 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by John Pennekamp
Thank you professor! In my 8000 hours (3000 in a CRJ) I think I have a good grasp of how to use radar! I paint ground at 80 miles and +2. if you tilt it above that, you still see nothing.

If you point the radar to -2 at FL300 all you see is the ground more than 20 miles out. That's as useless as your advice. Let me know when you get typed on the plane.
lol, vintage pennekamp. i am not the only one who thinks you dont know how to use the radar.. and i just might have a type in the crj and i now know i do have more hours in the plane than you. but since you know all i don't have to explain that to you. and its not professor, you can call me doctor.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
metrodriver
Regional
6745
02-12-2011 10:08 AM
n287hg
Regional
79
05-11-2009 05:07 AM
skypine27
Cargo
29
04-22-2009 03:06 PM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
15
11-14-2008 10:55 AM
Nuno Daniel
Flight Schools and Training
11
09-20-2008 10:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices