Just a reminder to RAH pilots, our CEOs have NOT done this....

you're right. Your CEO takes his own flying and gives it to guys like you willing to fly a bigger plane for the same or less money to get around scope. :rolleyes:

apc.com search gojet pay. obviously they didn't get around scope otherwise there wouldn't be a separate list would there, it would be illegal. Now if you're talking about the AA scope then yes. But so have a bunch of other airlines started to get around major scope.

do tell what the pay was when GoJet started up....

I think it was the same as the Mesa CRJ7s.

ha ha that's funny. Just like Colgan didn't get around Pinnacle's scope, even tho the mediator said they did initially then went back and said, oh you are 2 separate companies even though the top management is all the same and the money is funneled from one company to the other...:rolleyes:

you keep telling yourself you are 2 separate companies.

Well yea they are separate companies. The issue is the seniority list. We don't have control over the past. Other than complaining on forums, what do you think should happen mooney?

Lets correct that...

Just a reminder to MEP pilots, RAH CEO's did this to us....

I hope you don't work for Pinnacle.... because if you do you are sorely misinformed as to what the scope lawsuit was about....

Do you deny Colgan pilots the jumpseat?

Airwillie, if Hulas had purchased the 2 190's to fly for Midwest, and wanted to pay you GJ CRJ700 pay, what would you have done?

The answer is "I'd shut up and fly them" and I'll give you 2 GREAT reasons why.

1) He'd fire you if you didn't cause 618 doesn't care.

2) You couldn't possibly tell him to screw because thats what TSA tried to do. THEN, he'd start JetGo (GJ's alter ego) and pay them $2 less than you to fly a bigger plane because you didn't "secure the flying".

sooooo, you'd fly it.