Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Turboprop pilots past and present >

Turboprop pilots past and present

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Turboprop pilots past and present

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2009 | 12:12 PM
  #11  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default What Juice Said

Juice is correct.

From an engineering standpoint, "power," = Force x Velocity. The traditional method to rate this in the US is Horsepower, which is 550 ft-lbs/second.

It's been a while since I've flown a turboprop, and I don't know the particulars of your engine, but here's a hypothetical example:

Torque: 1800 ft-lbs
RPM: 2400
"Average" Prop radius (To calculate average "speed" of the blade): 4 ft

Math:

1800 ft-lbs x 2400 rpm x 4 ft / 60 sec per minute (to convert RPM to RPS); then /550 to change ft-lbs/sec to horsepower

Answer: 523 hp.

How the engine develops that torque or rpm is irrelevant. Doesn't matter if the ITT split is 100 degrees: power is determined by ft-lbs/sec.

A way to prove it: if your turn coordinator is sensitive enough, the ball will move towards the higher-powered engine if the guy is matching ITT. ("Step on the good engine;" just like in engine-out practice)
Reply
Old 06-13-2009 | 12:21 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

I have never heard of matching ITT and to me it is silly. The airplane will not fly straight if one side is producing less torque.
Reply
Old 06-13-2009 | 12:28 PM
  #13  
pokey9554's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
From: Cessna 150
Default

Ask him if jet pilots sync ITTs or N1s. Then ask him if when he got his multi, he matched CHTs or MF then props. Then tell him he is wrong and everybody is making fun of him.
Reply
Old 06-13-2009 | 12:40 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Thanks for all the replies guys! I flew BE-1900's before this and EMB-120's and we always matched torque as to not exceed ITT limitations. His reasoning was so that fuel flow would be the same and prevent an imbalance and therefore the need to crossfeed.

Me: "then we are flying sideways".

Him: "just trim it out".

Me: "we could pull the power out all the way on one engine and center the ball, but we would still be flying sideways".

Him: "we are not flying sideways that much".

Me: "Okay if that is the way you want it done then that is the way I'll do it"

He was obviously the captain.
Reply
Old 06-13-2009 | 12:41 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by pokey9554
Ask him if jet pilots sync ITTs or N1s. Then ask him if when he got his multi, he matched CHTs or MF then props. Then tell him he is wrong and everybody is making fun of him.
haha good point.
Reply
Old 06-13-2009 | 01:06 PM
  #16  
JetFlyer06's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Delta
Default

In the Convair 640 (RR Dart) we matched engine RPM and ITT. First we would set and match engine RPM to 14,200 and then use fuel trimmers (toggle switches) to set the ITTs to 770. This method maintained a set RPM but reduced power output and temps. This is a pretty ancient airplane and the other TPs I've flown do not do things this way. The other one I've flown had P&Ws on it and we matched Torque.
Reply
Old 06-13-2009 | 01:25 PM
  #17  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

[QUOTE=Flex81;628023]

Him: "we are not flying sideways that much".
[QUOTE]

Me: You are not a bonehead that much.
Reply
Old 06-13-2009 | 01:34 PM
  #18  
Phuz's Avatar
Kerbal Rocket Surgeon
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
From: DTW 717A
Default

we match tq too.

Sounds like you found a weirdo, if he's concerned about uneven fuel flow on turboprop length flights is he monitoring where the fat people sit too?
Reply
Old 06-13-2009 | 01:40 PM
  #19  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

I see guys do this all the time! Matching ITT is not smart.

Look at this scenario: (R=Right, L=Left engine)

………… L ……….. R
ITT…. 640 …… 640
TQ…… 70 ….... 75

What’s wrong with this:
a. It increases yaw, one side is pulling harder than the other.
b. It increases drag, as you have to trim that yaw out in order to stay coordinated.
c. It decreases your a/c's total performance
d. It Increases your fuel consumption.
e. You’re more than likely operating the R engine much hotter than the L seeing that 1 bad thermocoupler can usually decrease your temperature reading by 15 degrees. Remember these things can't last forever; after all they are located in the heart of the engine and are exposed to its hottest temperatures.

So which side is right? I’m betting on the L side being correct. So I’d limit my L side to the recommended temperature and match the R side torque.

In the EMB we’re temperature limited to 800 T6 (ITT) and we get a Master Caution T6 (ITT) warning at 816. We climb limit ourselves to 720 unless we need the extra power (Wx, Terrain, etc). Let’s say that your CA wants to get home quick and is running the example below:

…………. L ……….. R
ITT…. 790 …… 790
TQ…… 82 ….... 86

There is a really good possibility he’s frying his R engine and doesn’t even know. He probably has 1 or 2 bad thermocouplers and his R engine is showing 15-30 degrees cooler than it actually is (790+30=820).

On the E120 each bad thermocoupler accounts for about 15 degrees of temperature change, the question is what do yours account for?

Bottom line, match the torques to the most restrictive ITT and you'll always be safe.

Last edited by JetJock16; 06-13-2009 at 01:51 PM.
Reply
Old 06-13-2009 | 01:41 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 254
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by pokey9554
Ask him if jet pilots sync ITTs or N1s. Then ask him if when he got his multi, he matched CHTs or MF then props. Then tell him he is wrong and everybody is making fun of him.

That's too funny!

Flex, tell him to kindly step out of the drivers seat, clap both hands so you know he isn't touching anything because you just took his turboprop card.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
Jetrecruiter
Regional
36
01-23-2009 08:50 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM
Splanky
Regional
8
08-22-2008 05:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices