Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Turboprop pilots past and present >

Turboprop pilots past and present

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Turboprop pilots past and present

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2009 | 11:27 AM
  #51  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by ImEbee
Has everyone forgot that every manual (correct me if I'm wrong) references power settings in torque? There is your answer. That's why its called cruise power and not cruise temp. Just ask him where you can find the cruise ITT chart opposed to the cruise power chart in the manual.
I fly a Piaggio. The first place I looked was in the manual, but it just gives you a chart that doesn't tell you what to set your power to or how to set it. EX: at FL350, the ITT should be x and the torque should be y. You could use either value. Common sense tells you to use the most restrictive, but it wasn't black and white. Therefore I didn't reference it in the debate.
Reply
Old 06-20-2009 | 05:31 PM
  #52  
Be Realistic's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by b82rez
Good for you!! Way to pick your battles!
Not picking battles, I just think if you are there to do a job according to a manual, for safety or other reasons, why not just to that. Then when the preverbial hits the fan, you were doing it right.

Too many Mavricks doing their own thing cause accidents.

The only real question is, when you come across one, how to handle them?

Stick to SOPs. If you can't, you deserve everything that comes to you.
Reply
Old 06-21-2009 | 11:13 AM
  #53  
ImEbee's Avatar
Portuguese Troubleshooter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Burrito Bomber
Default

Originally Posted by Flex81
I fly a Piaggio. The first place I looked was in the manual, but it just gives you a chart that doesn't tell you what to set your power to or how to set it. EX: at FL350, the ITT should be x and the torque should be y. You could use either value. Common sense tells you to use the most restrictive, but it wasn't black and white. Therefore I didn't reference it in the debate.
Stupid Italians
Reply
Old 06-21-2009 | 06:43 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: DC9 Flap Operator
Default

Originally Posted by Be Realistic
Not picking battles, I just think if you are there to do a job according to a manual, for safety or other reasons, why not just to that. Then when the preverbial hits the fan, you were doing it right.

Too many Mavricks doing their own thing cause accidents.

The only real question is, when you come across one, how to handle them?

Stick to SOPs. If you can't, you deserve everything that comes to you.
Its one thing to violate SOP, its another to break the Ca's Ba**s about a 3% difference in charted TQ.

Last edited by BeaglePilot; 06-21-2009 at 07:13 PM.
Reply
Old 06-22-2009 | 01:42 AM
  #55  
Be Realistic's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Thats call decision making (Even FO's have to think at times!).

3% is sweets fa, but when you start to see 10-15% or even more over charted, or even between sides is it time to say something?

Nobody is going to bust balls for a needle's width.
Reply
Old 06-22-2009 | 11:17 AM
  #56  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by BeaglePilot
Its one thing to violate SOP, its another to break the Ca's Ba**s about a 3% difference in charted TQ.
I never say anything (as an FO or previously as a CA) unless it is gonna violate or kill me. My captain called me out when I was not matching ITT. It irritates me when my captains tell me how to fly the airplane, and 99% of the time I let it roll off my shoulders even if they are wrong. This was just so silly that I had to respectfully disagree with him. Although in the end I just set the power the way he wanted it so we didn't have to argue. We got along great the entire trip.

I agree with you 100% though. It is better not to knit-pick because then tempers can flare and a breakdown in CRM could result.
Reply
Old 06-23-2009 | 05:23 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Flex81
His reasoning was so that fuel flow would be the same and prevent an imbalance and therefore the need to crossfeed.
I just flew a trip with several different aircraft using PW-120 and PW-123 engines. There was no correlation to higher ITT and higher fuel flow. Sometimes the engine with the higher ITT had a higher fuel flow, sometimes it did not.

Now if his reasoning is that he wants to balance fuel flow, as silly as that sounds, why does he not just match fuel flow gauges?
Reply
Old 06-23-2009 | 05:36 AM
  #58  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Making them puke from the left
Default

I have not read all of the posts in this thread, but I just don't understand how someone would think that ITT trumps Torque in power settings. Set your desired torque using ITT as limiting factor. If one engine temps out the hot engine is now your new torque max.... for both engines. By matching ITTs, on most A/C, there is no way that both engines are producing the same amount of torque. This casues the plane to be uncordinated requiring more un-needed rudder trim to be used.
Reply
Old 06-23-2009 | 09:25 AM
  #59  
propjunkie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: E-170
Default

What ^^^^ said
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
Jetrecruiter
Regional
36
01-23-2009 08:50 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM
Splanky
Regional
8
08-22-2008 05:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices