Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Dumb question from a dumb guy. >

Dumb question from a dumb guy.

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Dumb question from a dumb guy.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2009, 12:37 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Originally Posted by gpatelzick View Post
how the union works, why it sucks or doesn't suck, who the key players are, why they suck or don't suck,
ALPA was founded by a group of pilots in the 20's b/c pilots were getting killed @ a high frequency, thus the motto of ALPA "Schedule with Safety". 1/2 of the pilots who founded ALPA later died flying. Since then, ALPA has been the industry leader in promoting safety and pilot interests. Over the past 20 years, the pay and Quality of Life (QOL, that's an important acronym) of the profession has gone downhill. Airlines used to be all 'major' airlines, like Delta and United. Now, Delta and United farm out as much of their flying as possible to lower cost contractors, the 'regionals'. Scope is what protects your flying (Delta seniority list pilots flying Delta flying, rather than Commair pilots flying Delta flying). ALPA has taken criticism for some of the leadership decisions they have made, particularly the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA, good acronym there) decisions made that allowed Regional Jets (RJ's) to be flown by 'regional airlines' rather than 'major airlines'. At the time, the 'major' airline offered higher pay to the Delta pilots in exchange for giving up 'scope' on the RJ's (follow me?). Little did ALPA know, RJ's would get bigger and end up accounting for 50% of all flights in the US. RJ pilots are paid less than 'mainline' pilots to do pretty much the same thing, so RJ's keep getting bigger, and 'regional airlines' keep growing. The problem? Most 'regional' pilots want to be 'mainline pilots'. 'Mainline is shrinking, but there's now more regional pilots (b/c the regionals are growing) who all have the same goal, but, there's now less 'mainline' pilot positions. Thus, every 'regional' takes lower and lower wages (whipsawing each other, as well as 'lowering the bar', a proverbial bar that each CBA should exceed, called 'pattern bargaining') so that their airline can grow, they can upgrade to Captain (CA), and then apply to mainline, hoping that they get picked. ALPA's big issues now are safety (as it has always been) and bettering the pilot profession. This is a tough position, b/c ALPA represents both regional AND mainline pilots, thus some pilots feel that ALPA has a conflict of interest. The Teamsters is the other main union, but they don't primarily represent pilots, so their national clout on issues is HUGE, but not often used to promote pilot interests. All the other unions are 'in house' unions that represent only the pilots of that airline. US Airways, UPS, Southwest, JetBlue, and American all have in house unions.

who are the good/bad airlines and why
The 'good' airline is a relative term. It's usually the one that give you the best QOL, the highest pay, retirement, and insurance (R&I), and is actually around when you retire (that's the hardest one). Traditionally, pilots want to work for whomever is the 'flavor of the day', the one with the best current pay (though not necessarily the best prospects). Who is that today? It's generally agreed that Southwest, Fed Ex, UPS, NetJets are the best today. Allegiant, the carrier that makes the most $ as a % of revenue - they don't pay as well, and fly from smaller airports to slightly bigger airports with older planes - they're less sexy, and thus are considered a 'backwater', though they're likely the best business as a pure aviation enterprise today. There are a million different reasons one particular airline is 'the best' for you, and it is a totally individual choice, but the herd would tell you that the 4 I mentioned are 'the best' b/c they currently pay the most (though all are great companies with solid business plans, though so was TWA, Pan Am and Eastern). The worst airlines? Hmm . . . . It's likely a regional though. The ones that that the most flack on the boards right now are Mesa (lower pay on jets, but getting sympathy b/c their corrupt management has likely bankrupted them. Jonathan Ornstein, JO, is their CEO, he's despised), Republic (they will now be flying 100 seat jets for low pay, and are the airline that is flying the biggest 'regional' jets, thus threatening 'mainline' growth and pilots future job prospects the most), and GoJet (they fly for United Express. The company that owns Trans States Airlines (TSA) essentially founded GoJet to 'end-around' American Airline's (AA's, and their pilot union, the APA) scope clause - all flying for American Connection must be done by an airline that operates jet with no more than 50 seats. TSA flew for AA, thus couldn't have 70 seat jets. But if you founded a new company, called it 'GoJets', then GoJets could fly the 70 seat flying for United Express. There's MUCH more to the GoJet story, and it usually gets pilots, particularly TSA pilots, so steamed that the thread has to be closed b/c of insults). The most despised of all - Gulfstream Airlines (not to be confused with Gulfstream Aircraft, which is a manufacturer, not an airline). GA runs a program where pilots with their CMEL-I can pay $25,000 to fly as a first officer (FO) for 250 hours. I'll let you read more about THAT on your own.


what is "scope" and why is it going down the toilet
'Scope' is the contractual provision that requires that a pilot group fly a particular aircraft (as an example, Continental's scope is for all 50+ seat jet aircraft, meaning that any plane flying with Continental painted on its side that is a jet, and over 50 seat MUST be flown by CO pilots. CO has the best 'scope', b/c it has 'scoped out' the most aircraft as their own, thus unable to be contracted out to regionals). As discussed, regionals are growing, mainline is shrinking - and it's all b/c of scope (as seen by professional pilots), or $ (as seen by airline management, who love the situation, though it's now potentially compromising safety and getting aviation in the news and testifying before Congress and the NTSB more than the airlines would like).

RJ vs. Major or legacy, how many seats???
An RJ used to mean a 50 seat jet, one that 'mainline' pilots gave up the scope on. Then it became a 70 seat jet. Now its any jet made by Canadair or Embraer that is flown under contract by a pilot group other than the name brand painted on the side. The smallest 'RJ' in the US is a EMB-135 (35 seats), and the largest is currently a CRJ-900 (86 seats) or a ERJ-190 (the EMB 190 is tough, b/c it's flown by JetBlue and US Airways - making it NOT and RJ - but now flown by Republic - making it an RJ). 'Legacy' is generally considered to be Delta (DL), American (AA), United (UA), Continental (CO), and US Airways (US). 'Major' is any airline that flies 100+ seat aircraft under their own brand, though the Dept. of Transportation (DOT) calls any airline with over $100 mil. in revenue a major.

Books or articles would be apreciated too.
The 2 must read aviation books would be
  1. "Flying the Line" Vol. I and Vol. II. These are the history of ALPA.
  2. "Hard Landing". This is the business history of commercial aviation.

Many pilots will include links to articles in their posts. Bookmark them and read them. Airline Pilot Central (APC) is part of what this forum runs under. There's tons of 'featured articles' on there. Most are written for professional pilots, but are more 'jargon free' than the forums (though some areas of the forum are made for pilots such as yourself. The 'regionals' is not one of them).

but the bottom line is...I LOVE to fly, always have ... always will, and I want to make educated decisions on the issues that will effect my AND your futures.
Bottom line - reading these forums will undermine your love of aviation. It's a business, and, while it's GREAT when the flightdeck door is closed and pilots fly planes, there's a good deal more to being a pilot than flying a plane, and those on this forum like to complain (myself included). Just take everything tounge-in-cheek, and read all you can.

"Safety, Regs, Common sense." In that order, always follow it, and you'll make a great professional aviator. Welcome to the forums.

-Sniper

(as you see below, even my signature is related to scope)
Sniper is offline  
Old 07-06-2009, 03:33 PM
  #22  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
Default

Sniper...thanks for that great reply. I know it's going to take a lot of reading, but you definately gave me a head start. Any threads in particular you recommend ?

Thanks again,
Greg Patelzick
gpatelzick is offline  
Old 07-06-2009, 06:21 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waldo11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Turning off the spigot....
Posts: 329
Default

Great post Sniper. BTW I have always loved the Avatar.
Waldo11 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
DaRaiders
Cargo
1
12-15-2008 09:24 PM
MEMpilot
Hangar Talk
1
10-02-2008 10:13 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices