|
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 661447)
If you had the option to live in base you wouldn't take it. No one wanted the aircraft here but once they are you'd be an idiot to not bid to live in base.
PS You work for GoJets. There's not larger example of a hypocrite. Do I think it was unfortuate that it had to come to go jettss for tsa? YES Do I care and feel that the mistakes of 2005 are in anyway because of me and should be my problem? NO |
Originally Posted by StrikeTime
(Post 661030)
Just because you work for Gojet doesn’t mean you have to constantly talk crap about every other carrier. I’ve seen nothing of value come out of your posts. Your attempt at trying to put out a misconception that every carrier is as bad as yours is failing… just stop while you’re at it.
You must be the ashamed pilot, or worn out from working for such an outfit since you have so much to say about everyone else.. Redirect those feelings of hostility elsewhere.. buy yourself a stress ball, maybe that will help or just go get laid if you can afford it. How awesome it is to be anonymous, right? As for RAH pilots, I am not happy with what is happening but neither are they. A majority of us understand this. If you weren’t so ashamed of yourself maybe you would have the opportunity to talk with some of those pilots (in person rather than behind a keyboard) and realize what the RAH pilot group thinks of this as a whole. |
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 660905)
Meaning what? If you think that means you don't have to worry about wake you're dead wrong. It's not just about size of aircraft. Lighten up dude.
Isn't the wake strength (generally) related to the aircraft weight. I mean, that why they use the word "heavy". Right? Is the E170 gross weight that much more then a CRJ? |
Originally Posted by AirWillie
(Post 661770)
Sorry, looks like I hit a nerve.
|
Originally Posted by MD80
(Post 661931)
Isn't the wake strength (generally) related to the aircraft weight.
|
i think this guy got ****ed off when he was flying a 172 and told caution wake turbulence departing citation
|
Originally Posted by MD80
(Post 661931)
Isn't the wake strength (generally) related to the aircraft weight. I mean, that why they use the word "heavy". Right?
Is the E170 gross weight that much more then a CRJ? You don't have to be flipped completely upside down for it to become an issue. Vref over the numbers in an ERJ with a wake sweeping across from an E-Jet/erj/crj/717/737 could still cause enough disturbance where it's better to go missed. Wake strength might "generally" be related to aircraft weight but that doesn't mean you have to be behind a A380 to notice it. Refuse to believe it all you want but wake is like gun, don't show it respect and it could come back to bite you. |
Originally Posted by AirWillie
(Post 661770)
Sorry, looks like I hit a nerve.
|
Originally Posted by IBPilot
(Post 662037)
no, it's not that you work for GoJet, necessarily. It's that you constantly bash every other airline out there,except the one you happen to be at at the current time. You even bashed GoJet before you went there, as did 2 other well known GJetters on this forum. THAT is the problem people have with you (and those other 2).
|
Mod note:
This might be a good time to, once again, explain how the ignore user function works. Click on the users screen name, click on personal profile, and add the user to your ignore list. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:08 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands