Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ASA Red Arrow Days

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2009 | 01:13 PM
  #1  
Intl Jumper's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: CRJ-700/CRJ-900 Gear Monkey
Default ASA Red Arrow Days

Does anyone know what is up with all of the red arrow days on Sked plus? You can't move a single off day anymore....Looks like something that needs too be addressed during the new contract negotiations.
Reply
Old 08-30-2009 | 03:53 PM
  #2  
Avroman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,142
Likes: 4
From: FIRE ALPA
Default

Didn't you guys just finish contract negotiations about a year ago?
Reply
Old 08-30-2009 | 04:50 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: crj-200 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
Didn't you guys just finish contract negotiations about a year ago?
Nov 20, 2007, Expires Nov 20, 2010, I think ALPA and ASA starts it's negotiations a year before it expires so in a few months.
Reply
Old 08-31-2009 | 04:55 AM
  #4  
John Pennekamp's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Default

Why did we furlough if we're so short on pilots? This pilot group needs to demand answers. I think the good times are about to end.
Reply
Old 08-31-2009 | 08:35 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

22 red arrow days in September, including a stretch from the 4th-21st. Where is the union on this?? Also, are there any new rumors these days?
Reply
Old 08-31-2009 | 09:38 AM
  #6  
EV120's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Watching, always watching...
Default

"We are not canceling anything due to lack of crews. We are simply below the minimum level. There is also no need to staff for you to trade trips. You get what you get."

That is what MGMT answer will be.

Do I like it. No. Do I understand it, yes.
Reply
Old 08-31-2009 | 09:46 AM
  #7  
FlyASA's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: CRJ-200 First Officer
Default

Originally Posted by John Pennekamp
Why did we furlough if we're so short on pilots? This pilot group needs to demand answers. I think the good times are about to end.
Yeah I don't know what the deal is with that. The good times are definitely over though, we simply can't compete cost wise with the cheaper regionals like Pinnacle. It's worth it though to have a better contract, I'd rather stay out on the street an extra year or two than wait 5 years to make what I can make in my 2nd year at ASA.

Good luck to the 56 joining us on the curb tomorrow.
Reply
Old 08-31-2009 | 06:29 PM
  #8  
String682's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: 767 Captain
Default More from the water cooler...

I recently heard the company is being taken to court over the whole ‘red arrow day’ issue. Apparently it’s in violation of our contract, which states only a certain number (?) of days per month can be restricted (red arrow). Not the entire month, which seems to have been the norm over the last six months. If anybody has confirmation on this, please tell. And where exactly is this written in our contract, I have yet to find it, if anyone knows the reference, please share.

More water cooler talk – I’m told our DCI contract with big-D is up for renewal/negotiation sometime in 2010. The renewal supposedly stipulates that we will be the 2nd lowest cost DCI under big-D. If we should fall short on this, it could possibly jeopardize our 80% of ATL flying. Again, this is all second hand, so if anyone can elaborate, please do.

As for cost, all of our fuel saving efforts (minimizing APU, indexing, single engine taxi, etc…) is a noble effort, but I think it’s only a pinch in the bucket compared to what really eats at our bottom line, which is our high labor cost. Perhaps letting go of all the out station personnel has helped, but when it’s all said and done, apparently we have a high percentage of pilots (compared to other DCI’s) who max out on the high end of the pay scale.

I’m not saying it’s right or wrong, for who can blame them, many have come here and decided life was good, why move on. But unfortunately, the bean counters have based our model on a system where most folks move on in 7 to 10 years, not grow moss. But this is just my speculation, I’d be curious to see some actual numbers on the industries fuel cost vs. labor, perhaps someone out there can provide some perspective on this.

And for the record, I think it’s wrong to make the pax sweat on our idle descents from 10K, or the long taxi inns from the south runway, because were waiting for the hook up on C-concourse. The pax pay for a comfortable ride, lets ensure they get one.

OK, off my soap box, that's my 2c.
Reply
Old 08-31-2009 | 09:22 PM
  #9  
atlmsl's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by String682
I recently heard the company is being taken to court over the whole ‘red arrow day’ issue. Apparently it’s in violation of our contract, which states only a certain number (?) of days per month can be restricted (red arrow). Not the entire month, which seems to have been the norm over the last six months. If anybody has confirmation on this, please tell. And where exactly is this written in our contract, I have yet to find it, if anyone knows the reference, please share.

More water cooler talk – I’m told our DCI contract with big-D is up for renewal/negotiation sometime in 2010. The renewal supposedly stipulates that we will be the 2nd lowest cost DCI under big-D. If we should fall short on this, it could possibly jeopardize our 80% of ATL flying. Again, this is all second hand, so if anyone can elaborate, please do.

As for cost, all of our fuel saving efforts (minimizing APU, indexing, single engine taxi, etc…) is a noble effort, but I think it’s only a pinch in the bucket compared to what really eats at our bottom line, which is our high labor cost. Perhaps letting go of all the out station personnel has helped, but when it’s all said and done, apparently we have a high percentage of pilots (compared to other DCI’s) who max out on the high end of the pay scale.

I’m not saying it’s right or wrong, for who can blame them, many have come here and decided life was good, why move on. But unfortunately, the bean counters have based our model on a system where most folks move on in 7 to 10 years, not grow moss. But this is just my speculation, I’d be curious to see some actual numbers on the industries fuel cost vs. labor, perhaps someone out there can provide some perspective on this.

And for the record, I think it’s wrong to make the pax sweat on our idle descents from 10K, or the long taxi inns from the south runway, because were waiting for the hook up on C-concourse. The pax pay for a comfortable ride, lets ensure they get one.

OK, off my soap box, that's my 2c.
I don't have enough info about your first two points, but on the fuel, ASA does not pay for fuel costs so it doesn't affect the company. All fuel costs are passed on to Delta. You better believe I start the APU at 10,000 on a hot day with a full load. We can shut the APU down at the gate once we're plugged in. I refuse to make passengers miserable to save a dollar.
Reply
Old 09-01-2009 | 06:47 AM
  #10  
John Pennekamp's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Default

Originally Posted by String682
I recently heard the company is being taken to court over the whole ‘red arrow day’ issue. Apparently it’s in violation of our contract, which states only a certain number (?) of days per month can be restricted (red arrow). Not the entire month, which seems to have been the norm over the last six months. If anybody has confirmation on this, please tell. And where exactly is this written in our contract, I have yet to find it, if anyone knows the reference, please share.

More water cooler talk – I’m told our DCI contract with big-D is up for renewal/negotiation sometime in 2010. The renewal supposedly stipulates that we will be the 2nd lowest cost DCI under big-D. If we should fall short on this, it could possibly jeopardize our 80% of ATL flying. Again, this is all second hand, so if anyone can elaborate, please do.

As for cost, all of our fuel saving efforts (minimizing APU, indexing, single engine taxi, etc…) is a noble effort, but I think it’s only a pinch in the bucket compared to what really eats at our bottom line, which is our high labor cost. Perhaps letting go of all the out station personnel has helped, but when it’s all said and done, apparently we have a high percentage of pilots (compared to other DCI’s) who max out on the high end of the pay scale.

I’m not saying it’s right or wrong, for who can blame them, many have come here and decided life was good, why move on. But unfortunately, the bean counters have based our model on a system where most folks move on in 7 to 10 years, not grow moss. But this is just my speculation, I’d be curious to see some actual numbers on the industries fuel cost vs. labor, perhaps someone out there can provide some perspective on this.

And for the record, I think it’s wrong to make the pax sweat on our idle descents from 10K, or the long taxi inns from the south runway, because were waiting for the hook up on C-concourse. The pax pay for a comfortable ride, lets ensure they get one.

OK, off my soap box, that's my 2c.
You must be very new.

First, the "red arrow days" are NOT in the contract. The contract says they can only designate (4?) "restricted days". According to the company "red arrow days" are NOT "restricted days". they are correct. It may seem like semantics, but arbitrators live that kind of stuff. The union screwed the pooch by leaving a huge loophole here. ALPA is fighting this to save face, but they WILL lose.

Second, the DCI contract. What you were "told" is fact. I was in the union when that came to pass. (SkyWest bought us). Also management has been very vocal about it, throwing it in the pilot's faces at every opportunity. The real question is if DAL will actually drop us. I say 0% chance of that, but 90% chance of DAL and SKW renegotiating the SKW profit margin to something much lower. 10% chance of DAL buying ASA back.

Third... fuel savings/labor costs. YA THINK? Cleared for take off Captain Obvious!

Your last point, I flt the fiddy and start the APU on descent as soon as it starts to get hot. Crew and pax comfort come before saving DAL fuel. We seem to forget where our paychecks come from... the passengers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BigToe
Foreign
1603
09-14-2023 08:04 PM
elfouquer
Regional
10
06-13-2009 02:06 PM
purplepilot
Cargo
13
04-20-2009 11:10 AM
a300fr8dog
Cargo
2
01-15-2009 01:12 PM
tpersuit
Regional
91
09-28-2008 05:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices