Xjt

Reply Subscribe

Page 2 of 4

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

10-01-2009 | 09:43 PM

#11

minimwage4

2 days off

Joined: Jun 2009

Posts: 1,853

Likes: 0

From: Embraer Systems Analyst

Quote:

Originally Posted by flycrj200

Mesa will keep the flying according to people in the know at Mesa.

Well starting today UA can give notice any time for the cancellation so it's not over yet for JO.

10-01-2009 | 10:29 PM

#12

slipped

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Mar 2009

Posts: 278

Likes: 0

Will they ever have branded flying again?

10-02-2009 | 06:11 AM

#13

dojetdriver

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 3,732

Likes: 0

From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV

Quote:

Originally Posted by slipped

Will they ever have branded flying again?

Ahh............................................... .................................................. .......NO.

10-02-2009 | 06:27 AM

#14

xtreme

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Apr 2009

Posts: 279

Likes: 0

From: Right...CL65

AWAC has got the UAL flying in the bag. No doubt...for sho.

10-02-2009 | 08:55 AM

#15

tr disagree

Line Holder

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 86

Likes: 0

From: Furlough

Hopefully some announcment will be made soon. I hope XJT gets at least 20 airframes so we can get called back

10-02-2009 | 09:13 AM

#16

cybourg10

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 199

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by tr disagree

Hopefully some announcment will be made soon. I hope XJT gets at least 20 airframes so we can get called back

I don't think 20 airframes will get anyone called back. All it would do is get everyone back on full time status, i.e. no more 40 and 60 hr lines. We would need more airframes to get recalls.

10-02-2009 | 09:17 AM

#17

EMBFlyer

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 2,513

Likes: 66

From: MD-11 FO

Quote:

Originally Posted by cybourg10

I don't think 20 airframes will get anyone called back. All it would do is get everyone back on full time status, i.e. no more 40 and 60 hr lines. We would need more airframes to get recalls.

But that would put the most junior people in the company back on reserve! We can't have that!

10-02-2009 | 09:20 AM

#18

OKLATEX

Line Holder

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 424

Likes: 1

From: B767 FO

Quote:

Originally Posted by EMBFlyer

But that would put the most junior people in the company back on reserve! We can't have that!

I am out of the loop. Did they park some airplanes, or are these new airplanes? Good luck from a former COEX/ExpressJet guy! To me, it will always be COEX.

10-02-2009 | 09:20 AM

#19

CANAM

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Oct 2008

Posts: 439

Likes: 0

From: 1986 LeBaron Convertable

Quote:

Originally Posted by xtreme

AWAC has got the UAL flying in the bag. No doubt...for sho.

I sincerely hope AWAC is smarter than attempting to get back into bed with United. AWAC has been screwed so many times by UAL over the years and should know better.

10-02-2009 | 09:25 AM

#20

EMBFlyer

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 2,513

Likes: 66

From: MD-11 FO

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKLATEX

I am out of the loop. Did they park some airplanes, or are these new airplanes? Good luck from a former COEX/ExpressJet guy! To me, it will always be COEX.

We parked 30 airframes (135s) in the desert on Oct 1, 2008. We furloughed 347 as a result of that.

Concurrent with that (and what I was referencing), the Union allowed the company to offer Reduced Flying Lines. They company awarded MANY long-term 40/60 hour lines to guys, essentially making them instant relief line holders, while people hundreds of numbers senior to them are on reserve. They can also pick up advertised trips and build their line up to 80-90+ hours every month. Just ask one of the union guys...he's doing it!