Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
WSJ Article on "Commuter" Safety >

WSJ Article on "Commuter" Safety

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

WSJ Article on "Commuter" Safety

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2009, 03:35 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by 742Dash View Post
Yes, both members of the Colgan crew had over 1500 hours. But their times were still low, especially in the case of a Captain in charge of a large and complex aircraft. And while I don’t know what the culture is/was a Colgan, it certainly does not sound like there is/was a cadre of seasoned, high time Captains serving as role models.
True, but we can go round and round in endless, stale, worn out, beating a dead horse fashion that has been done ad nauseum.

The crews with AA at LIT and Colombia had more, way more experience. Guess what? Dead people.

Sorry, but along the lines of a former post, it's not just higher time that will solve the issue.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 03:52 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 114
Default

Originally Posted by EVpilot View Post
Another worthless but damaging article by writers who do not do their research. No surprise there. Regional airlines are not commuter airlines. These are, in my opinion, two different things. If I were flying a Navajo in a scheduled 135 operation, then I would be a commuter airline pilot. I am not criticizing the commuter guys and gals. But what this article refers to is 121 operators and we operate on the same rules. The statistics they provide are useless as they are of too small a scale to be useful. These people have no clue. They addresses for the writers are at the end of the article. I suggest we all email them with our remarks.
I think you are 100% wrong. I don't know how the statistics are on too small of a scale. The majority of serious incidents have involved "regional" airlines in the past 6 years. The Colgan crew messed up. Regionals hire people with less experience and treat them poorly. I don't know where they misrepresented anything.
ERJFO is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 04:47 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BSOuthisplace's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: N/A
Posts: 637
Default

Originally Posted by deltabound View Post
"Some of the most difficult routes and grueling schedules are flown by pilots with the least experience and training."


That's really all you need to know about this article. I think that statement is 100% accurate.

What can Congress do? Well, as a pilot, I'd say be careful what you wish for . . .
I bet you if we had all the delta crews fly 4day, 6-8 leg a day trips, we would be hearing about planes overflying their destination, landing on the wrong runway, or worse, every other day. We'd probably have an equal number of accidents too. Thankfully that won't happen. I'd hate to hear twice as many "wind check"s...

In all seriousness, the amount of T/Os and ldgs and the duty time (fatigue) definitely should be factored in. In fact I'm surprised with all the supposedly inept newbies out there, we aren't having more accidents.
BSOuthisplace is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 04:59 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Airbus 319/320 Captain
Posts: 880
Default

Originally Posted by TPROP4ever View Post
The answer the average "Joe" would give is something like this: I want a round trip ticket in first class from NY to LA for $99, and I want to be able to carry 600 lbs of luggage, 4 carry-ons and those damn flight attendants better wait on me hand and foot. Oh wait I forgot my kids medicine can you get my checked bag from below so I can give little Joey his Riddilin, oh never mind, Ill just let him be a little hellion during the flight. Oh and if you dont give me what I want, I'll talk to the WSJ and tell them what a horrible airline this is??? What did you ask about pilots again?
That doesn't make it right. I agree with what you are saying but I believe that if a customer wants all of what you stated for $99, he is a minority. I honestly don't think people will sacrifice safety for saving a few bucks. Again, ask yourself the same question, would you? Then again, some of the airlines ( regional, among others) have been very clever when it comes to advertising their pilots experience. I remember a United Airlines commercial several years that esposed the vast experience of all their pilots only to find out they were hiring 300-400hr interns and other low time folks. I know its tough but I try to stay positive about the aviation profession and can only hope that one day your average "joe" will understand how important our job is.
brianb is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 05:18 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
drummerguy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: SF340 LCA
Posts: 112
Default

According to Sully's book, he was hired in the 80's by PSA (not a regional at the time) as a second officer on the 727 for 200$ a week. Major airlines hired pilots in the 60's with less than 500 hours (UAL). This year, a mainline crew with over 30,000 hrs collectively overflew their destination by 150 miles and the very same week another mainline crew landed on a taxiway in ATL of all places. A mainline pilot attempted to report for work under the influence and by the way a regional airline crew lost control of an airplane and flew it into the ground (cjc 3407). Of all of these incidents I personally knew the ca of 3407. The crew of that flight made horrible mistakes which resulted in the first fatal accident in this country in a few years. The problems we face today in this industry are really no different than the problems faced over the history of this industry. At the end of the day there are risks involved in flying and also at the end of the day no matter how old or young, no matter how much experience you do or don't have doesn't change the fact that we, a couple of human beings (which by the way, can occasionally make a mistake or two) and the weakest link in the cockpit. Thats right, whether you work for a major or a regional, no matter how long you have been doing this, and no matter how much you do or don't make, you could be the one that ends up killing everybody. All we can do is show up for work every day we are scheduled and do the absolute best we can that given day.
drummerguy is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 05:55 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by brianb View Post
That doesn't make it right. I agree with what you are saying but I believe that if a customer wants all of what you stated for $99, he is a minority. I honestly don't think people will sacrifice safety for saving a few bucks. Again, ask yourself the same question, would you? Then again, some of the airlines ( regional, among others) have been very clever when it comes to advertising their pilots experience. I remember a United Airlines commercial several years that esposed the vast experience of all their pilots only to find out they were hiring 300-400hr interns and other low time folks. I know its tough but I try to stay positive about the aviation profession and can only hope that one day your average "joe" will understand how important our job is.
I never said it made it right, but if you think the public thinks of anything other than price, you are nieve. This industry has been turned into Greyhound with wings (deregulation), Im not even sure this industry is sustainable for too many more years..
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 06:08 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cubflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Waiting for retirements
Posts: 232
Default

Originally Posted by brianb View Post
That doesn't make it right. I agree with what you are saying but I believe that if a customer wants all of what you stated for $99, he is a minority. I honestly don't think people will sacrifice safety for saving a few bucks. Again, ask yourself the same question, would you? Then again, some of the airlines ( regional, among others) have been very clever when it comes to advertising their pilots experience. I remember a United Airlines commercial several years that esposed the vast experience of all their pilots only to find out they were hiring 300-400hr interns and other low time folks. I know its tough but I try to stay positive about the aviation profession and can only hope that one day your average "joe" will understand how important our job is.
I disagree.......unfortunately.
cubflyer is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 09:59 PM
  #48  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default History

Low time pilots have always been hired. There is no direct correlation between low time pilots and accidents. The military hires pilots with Zero time and within a year and a few hundred hours they are fighter pilots. Europe and in other parts of the world they commonly hire low time pilots. At different times in our airlines history low time pilots have been hired to no ill aftermath.

The failure here was in the certification process at the airlines. It is very difficult for an airline to get rid of a bad pilot. Political correctness, the union and fear of a lawsuit keep pilots in the job long after they should have been let go.

There are thousands of pilots crossing the country right now with as little as a 3 month cram course academy flight training program and king tape education. We do not have planes raining down out of the sky all over the nation. It is not a question of training or experience.

Skyhigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 10:03 PM
  #49  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Thumbs up Bullseye

Originally Posted by iPilot View Post
I just think seeing all the low time people being hired in the last wave is a good indication to how this career has declined. The best the airlines can come up with are the fresh faced wonder kids with big dreams and no idea what this business is all about. The fact that some were hiring with wet commercial certificates shows just how bottom of the barrel they were. Even the "better" regionals had to lower their mins below 1,000 hours to fill the seats. That wouldn't of been a problem if there were lots of qualified individuals wanting to work in the airlines.
Bingo !!

Skyhigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 11:58 PM
  #50  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh View Post
Low time pilots have always been hired. There is no direct correlation between low time pilots and accidents. The military hires pilots with Zero time and within a year and a few hundred hours they are fighter pilots. Europe and in other parts of the world they commonly hire low time pilots. At different times in our airlines history low time pilots have been hired to no ill aftermath.

The failure here was in the certification process at the airlines. It is very difficult for an airline to get rid of a bad pilot. Political correctness, the union and fear of a lawsuit keep pilots in the job long after they should have been let go.

There are thousands of pilots crossing the country right now with as little as a 3 month cram course academy flight training program and king tape education. We do not have planes raining down out of the sky all over the nation. It is not a question of training or experience.

Skyhigh
If you are referring to 3407, the union had only just been voted in. Since the crash, we have probably had MORE pilots fired for cause than prior to the union. (I am neither defending nor attacking the dismissals, only refuting your statement.)

There are thousands of drunks driving tonight who WON'T get in an accident. That does not mean we should allow drunks to drive. As one who came to the regionals with ten times the "minimums" flying Caravans and piston twins, I was (and still am) learning almost every day. The notion that experience has no value is just plane wrong. Take Brett Favre, now he is a great QB, but look back at his time with the Falcons: same guy today, but with a lot more gray hairs.
FlyJSH is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HSLD
Hangar Talk
0
08-03-2009 06:08 PM
APM145
Regional
7
05-22-2009 04:01 PM
Pelican
Major
25
03-12-2009 10:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices