Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Weight restriction on regional aircraft >

Weight restriction on regional aircraft


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Weight restriction on regional aircraft

Old 06-27-2006 | 10:49 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JerrySpringer
ERJ is also a LDG Wt restriction on short flights when alternate is needed...and of course long haul with alternates due to fuel....

E170 doesn't seem to be too bad. I usually bump on to ZFW (72+about 90 bags) first.
The original models of the ERJ (the ERJs) are usually very weight restricted. The Next, the LRs are a little more accomadating. The XRs (the ones with winglets that only Express Jet flies, are almost never weight restricted, unless the flight is more than 3 hours
Reply
Old 07-16-2006 | 06:08 AM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ryane946
I was a stand-by with a lot of seniority. I know there were other stand-by's who were unable to get on. They definately got bumped because of a weight restriction. I have gotten on planes that were booked like 20/24 in first 178/158 in coach. I usually plan about 5-10% no-show factor. Higher for 6AM flights. I have almost mastered the art of flying stand-by, even with 90% loadfactors and busy travel seasons. But when a weight restriction gets thrown in the mix, I can get screwed.
Anyway, thanks for the responses.
This is easy to say and hard to do - but if you can talk to the captain.

Yes the CRJ200 can be weight restricted, it mostly happens when we need an alternate and so we're carrying extra fuel but of course we still need to make the max. landing weight at the original destination. I hear the EMB145 is worse and sometimes is weight restricted even without an alternate. We can also get restricted if there's a lot of international bags (which tend to be heavy and therefore take twice the weight credit for the same size).

Anyway - more times than you'd think we have the gate agent tell us we're weight restricted when we're not - I have no idea who tells them we are or how they get that information. When we hear it we can correct them. But who knows how many times we don't hear about it and the reason we have 47 on board is because the gate agent limited it without telling us. A good gate agent is trying to get as many people on as is legal, sadly in this day and the age the number of bad gate agents is too high.
Reply
Old 07-16-2006 | 07:40 PM
  #13  
Pdt's Btch's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat, EMB-145/140/135
Default

You can blame that Be1900 crash down in Charlotte for the weight restrictions, which afterwards they changed all the passenger weights and changed the way we have to load bags.

In the Dash, before the crash, if we were 200 lbs overweight, we would just move 10 carry-ons from the cargo to the cabin and the weight "magically" went away. We cant do that anymore (at least arn't supposed to)

We used to be able to fill the Dash full all the time, now it is weight restricted to 35 (out of 37) for EVERY flight no matter how short. Of course the DAsh8-300 have no problems taking 50 pax/83 bags/ and plenty of fuel for a alternate (and it will still land on a 3000 ft runway.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Herc130AV8R
Military
25
03-22-2008 05:22 PM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
29
02-02-2007 06:17 AM
Imeneo
Engineers & Technicians
33
01-13-2007 08:44 AM
Calpilot
Major
34
07-10-2006 03:35 PM
TravisUK
Major
22
05-01-2006 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices