Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Deal made on hours of training for co-pilots >

Deal made on hours of training for co-pilots

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Deal made on hours of training for co-pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2010, 08:30 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 618
Default Deal made on hours of training for co-pilots

By Jerry Zremski
NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF
Updated: March 13, 2010, 6:44 am / 2 comments
Published: March 13, 2010, 12:30 am


WASHINGTON — Senators have reached a compromise to dramatically increase the number of flight hours new commercial copilots need to get a license, though the figure falls short of what the group Families of Continental Flight 3407 was seeking.
Under a deal brokered by Sen. Charles E. Schumer and announced Friday, new co-pilots would have to have 800 hours of flight experience in specific, rigorous conditions, up from the current 250 hours of general experience.



Deal made on hours of training for co-pilots : The Tragedy of Flight 3407 : The Buffalo News
stbloc is offline  
Old 03-13-2010, 09:10 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Under the Schumer compromise, the FAA will have to set an 800-hour flight requirement for copilots by the end of next year. Some of that experience would have to be in multiple-pilot environments and adverse weather including icing, as well as in other specific conditions.
I wonder whether 'multi-pilot' would require a plane that actually requires two pilots on its type certificate, or can two guys just hop in a C-152? One will log instrument and the other PIC, of course. Most flight schools are in places where the weather is great, so there's no icing. Anyone ever heard of an aircraft certified for known icing typically used in civilian training? This will be interesting if it actually passes.

“We don’t want to have people coming right out of flight schools and right to the commercial airlines,” Kuwik said. “They’re going to have to do something else first. Their entry- level job is not going to be as a commercial airline pilot.”
Will the high priced flight schools get a carve out? I hope not. Good ground instruction is worthless if not practically applied.

Sounds like this bill will improve the experience of the average new pilot significantly if it passes in its proposed form - thank you families of 3407.
Sniper is offline  
Old 03-13-2010, 09:15 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
I wonder whether 'multi-pilot' would require a plane that actually requires two pilots on its type certificate, or can two guys just hop in a C-152? One will log instrument and the other PIC, of course. Most flight schools are in places where the weather is great, so there's no icing. Anyone ever heard of an aircraft certified for known icing typically used in civilian training? This will be interesting if it actually passes.
I've spent my entire career trying hard to AVIOD icing conditions and I do not have much experience flying in icing conditions either, so am I not qualified to sit right seat in an airliner either then? This seems strange overall, but I guess not so much in light of what event is helping push this bill. Personally, I think it falls short (the 800 hours), but then again compromise is the name of the game.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 03-13-2010, 09:28 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: CR7 Capt.
Posts: 88
Default

I haven't been convinced the ATP shouldn't be a requirement. Of course, my faith in congress is exceeded only by my faith in the FAA - if you know what I mean. Aren't they the same idiots who are contemplating monitoring CVRs for punitive measures? Air Transport aircraft should require an Airline Transport Pilot certificate, seem sort of obvious. Spare me the shrill cries from the Riddle grads...
j1b3h0 is offline  
Old 03-14-2010, 03:42 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 66
Default

I would have liked to see 1500 hours w/o restrictions. There are plenty of known ice airplanes out there. 402's, barons, king airs, etc. But how is a guy with only 800 hours going to get on a multi crew plane in the civil world. Realistically how many multi crew airplanes are out there in the civil world other then jets. And I don’t think an insurance company is going to stand for that. I guess possibly you could find a single pilot 350 and ask for a ride to build time but how many of those opportunities are out there.
seahawker01 is offline  
Old 03-14-2010, 03:49 AM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 66
Default

Deleted... thanks
seahawker01 is offline  
Old 03-14-2010, 04:11 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saab2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,750
Default

The law of unintended consequences will undoubtedly come into effect here. When, in a few years, the regional airlines need to hire in significant numbers there will be very, very few pilots with the requisite experience.

What could this mean? Foreign pilots being imported en masse to operate US equipment.

Don't think this can't happen? It happens all over the world.
saab2000 is offline  
Old 03-14-2010, 04:39 AM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 84
Default

They should just make it 1500TT. Unfortunately I know flight schools in Central Florida (and the students that go there) that are not only pencil whipping but also 'selling' pencil whipped hours. Very unfortunate and makes me very angry after I know that I (and the general pilot populous) have worked quite hard to get their hours legitimately.
Smash312 is offline  
Old 03-14-2010, 04:46 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by saab2000 View Post
The law of unintended consequences will undoubtedly come into effect here. When, in a few years, the regional airlines need to hire in significant numbers there will be very, very few pilots with the requisite experience.

What could this mean? Foreign pilots being imported en masse to operate US equipment.

Don't think this can't happen? It happens all over the world.
I don't understand this argument. Why would foreign pilots want to work in the US, where we have the worst work rules and pay in the world for pilots? We ARE the third world labor in the aviation world.
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 03-14-2010, 05:27 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

Hi!

They'll get the foreign pilots from Africa...oh wait, there is a shortage, so no.
They'll get the foreign pilots from the Middle East...oh wait, there is a shortage, so no.
They'll get the foreign pilots from Asia...oh wait, there is a shortage, so no.
They'll get the foreign pilots from S./Central America...oh wait, there is shortage, so no.
They'll get the foreign pilots from Antarctica???
Europe is even importing experienced pilots, and the T&Cs there are way better than the US, so I don't see that happening.

Alien pilot training on Mars will provide the pilots???

cliff
NBO
atpcliff is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
DryMotorBoatin
Regional
22
07-06-2009 06:21 PM
Flyby1206
Regional
138
06-29-2009 09:59 AM
Maxclimb12
Major
1
03-18-2009 03:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices