Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Deal made on hours of training for co-pilots >

Deal made on hours of training for co-pilots

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Deal made on hours of training for co-pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2010 | 12:49 PM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorhi
Or it will push the "low paying" 15/hour jobs down to a Cape Air type environment (Cape Air=Good Company don't get me wrong here), but that's where someone should be starting, right seat of a light twin (402 to 1900 type airplane) with someone vastly more experienced in the left seat to show them the ropes.
Does Cape Air use two pilots on the 402s?
Reply
Old 03-14-2010 | 12:56 PM
  #42  
NightIP's Avatar
Tuk er jerbs!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: B747 Left
Default

Originally Posted by Aztec1
Does Cape Air use two pilots on the 402s?
Yes, if the autopilot is inop or the PIC is on high mins (per Part 135). Still, it's an invaluable learning experience for the guy in the right seat (and also the guy in the left seat). Recently the company pulled a bunch of low-time guys off the ramp and put them through class as FOs. Great way to really learn the ropes before being put out on your own.

And that's all fine and good. Either way, the pilots here get two-crew experience. But, what about all the AirNet pilots, Wiggins, Ameriflight, etc.? Why are they excluded? They do a damn hard job and do a fine job at it.
Reply
Old 03-14-2010 | 12:58 PM
  #43  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Window Seat
Default

Short Version: Yes.

Longer Version: Usually on routes where it is "beneficial" and they also consider it a "feeder program", get good guys with good attitudes but short on time, put em in the right seat, train them up and put them on the line. Works well from what the people I know there tell me.

Also, before people jump on this and say that the average 135 op isn't going to pay for the extra pilot, I bet you they would, low rate and they double as a ramper/loader/agent/fueler etc. So I bet Ameriflight/Wiggins etc. would probably be on board with that if they realized the benefits, 15/block hour is not a lot more than paying for another ramper to sit on the ground.
Reply
Old 03-14-2010 | 01:52 PM
  #44  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Diver Driver
The days of 250 hours direct to the right seat are rightfully over.
I am not so much against them as simply not for them. I don't care whether you "pay to play" at Gulfstream or "pay to play" as a CFI/135, but you should come with more than simply a temp certificate.
Reply
Old 03-14-2010 | 03:35 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: http://rahcontractnow.org/
Default

Originally Posted by saab2000
The law of unintended consequences will undoubtedly come into effect here. When, in a few years, the regional airlines need to hire in significant numbers there will be very, very few pilots with the requisite experience.

What could this mean? Foreign pilots being imported en masse to operate US equipment.

Don't think this can't happen? It happens all over the world.
This is one of the most pathetic theories I have read on APC. I have no clue how you came about such an idea with the ‘law of unintended consequences’ but lets look at all the requirements that need to be fulfilled by a foreign pilot to fly as a commercial pilot for hire in the United States:

-These pilots would need to obtain a VISA with a work permit; this is not easily handed out by the U.S government; It can take YEARS for people to get this even after they have been in this country for a while

-These pilots would need to pass the TSA security investigation.

-These pilots would need to either convert or validate there certificates and I am pretty sure the commercial portion of this would have to be done with a Designated Examiner (checkride) either way. It depends what country the FAA has an agreement with, not necessarily the authorized agency.

-As ATPCliff stated, foreign pilots make so much more than U.S pilots. Do you really thing these pilots are going to flood our market to join the ranks of our regionals?

Give me a break…
Reply
Old 03-14-2010 | 05:05 PM
  #46  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Whacker77
Just so you know, I am not and was never an advocate of 250 hours direct to the right seat. Still, I think these types of government forced regulations place a terribly unfair burden on the airlines and those choosing to make piloting a career. My sense is this is just another in a series of moves designed to strangle general aviation and make airline flying the domain of military pilots.

It's true that 135 offers aircraft capable of flying in icing, but how realistic is it that these jobs will be available? There aren't that many right now and I doubt many will spring up because of this. When you consider the shadiness of some 135 operators and the requirements insurance providers place on some, I just don't see how it will work effectively and not cause a major pilot shortage.

That's just my view and I know other will disagree with me.
If your profile is up-to-date you are a CFI. You will change your mind on this after a few years at a regional.

You will eventually find it comforting that not everyone will be able to come into the industry and undercut your livelihood...some will, but at least they will be more experienced and responsible, and have a higher opinion of their own professional and self worth.

There is however some potential risk that there really will be a pilot shortage at the entry-level. Oh well...airlines will have to raise prices to attract pilots, which will drive away a few customers. The remaining customers and pilots will all be better off.
Reply
Old 03-14-2010 | 06:00 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 1
From: 744 CA
Default

To me the icing requirement is bogus.... I have flown in icing in every airframe I have flown in since I graduated UPT .... but I sure as hell didnt track it..... Perhaps a better idea would have been some indepth classes on icing, types of it, how it effects airfoils....etc.. et al.... followed by some good sim work .... but what the hell....
Reply
Old 03-14-2010 | 06:39 PM
  #48  
Coehill's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Changes every Fall
Default

Another thing to add would be that post 9/11 pilots are prohibited from the H1B visa program. Which is an employer sponsored visa. Previously air operator's could import foreign pilots pretty easily through this program.

It seems like ATP is what we mostly agree on. It would be great if they got rid of this SIC type BS as well. Change towards ICAO and require Type Ratings for Co-pilots!

Originally Posted by StrikeTime
This is one of the most pathetic theories I have read on APC. I have no clue how you came about such an idea with the ‘law of unintended consequences’ but lets look at all the requirements that need to be fulfilled by a foreign pilot to fly as a commercial pilot for hire in the United States:

-These pilots would need to obtain a VISA with a work permit; this is not easily handed out by the U.S government; It can take YEARS for people to get this even after they have been in this country for a while

-These pilots would need to pass the TSA security investigation.

-These pilots would need to either convert or validate there certificates and I am pretty sure the commercial portion of this would have to be done with a Designated Examiner (checkride) either way. It depends what country the FAA has an agreement with, not necessarily the authorized agency.

-As ATPCliff stated, foreign pilots make so much more than U.S pilots. Do you really thing these pilots are going to flood our market to join the ranks of our regionals?

Give me a break…
Reply
Old 03-14-2010 | 07:11 PM
  #49  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HercDriver130
To me the icing requirement is bogus.... I have flown in icing in every airframe I have flown in since I graduated UPT .... but I sure as hell didnt track it..... Perhaps a better idea would have been some indepth classes on icing, types of it, how it effects airfoils....etc.. et al.... followed by some good sim work .... but what the hell....
Agreed. In most cases where icing has been the fatal factor it came down to the decisions made prior to ever taking off.
Reply
Old 03-14-2010 | 09:09 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

This is good, let's see if it passes. 800 is better than commercial mins. And also let's see if they actually enforce it when they actually need more warm bodies and no one shows up.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
DryMotorBoatin
Regional
22
07-06-2009 06:21 PM
Flyby1206
Regional
138
06-29-2009 09:59 AM
Maxclimb12
Major
1
03-18-2009 03:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices