Chautauqua Airlines Faces $348,000 Civil Pena
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
I want to know who decides the amount of the fine. Eagle was recently fined $2.9 million for flying 1100 flights with improperly repaired gear doors while Chautauqua was fined 348,000 for flying 27,700 flights with various inspections missing.
In other words Eagle was fined $2,636 per flight and Chautauqua was fined $12.56 per flight.
In other words Eagle was fined $2,636 per flight and Chautauqua was fined $12.56 per flight.
#13
I don't think he was trying to say it was OK or that it was excusable, I just think he was trying to say it was not intentional. There are some pilots who want to believe that maintenance and management is all a giant global conspiracy to screw with them.
I think he was just trying to say that it is a complex system, that it is simple to miss things, and that often it is a simple paperwork problem rather than someone trying to save money by not turning a wrench.
I think he was just trying to say that it is a complex system, that it is simple to miss things, and that often it is a simple paperwork problem rather than someone trying to save money by not turning a wrench.
For example, when ASA missed some engine borescope inspections on 90-something CRJs at C-check last year, I was riding the crew bus with a flock of hens, I mean flight attendants, and roosters, I mean pilots, who were clucking and crowing about the situation. They wanted our new Maintenance management team to get the ax.. immediately. It turns out, for whatever reason, our computer software didn't include the engine borescope inspection as part of the C-check work package, so it wasn't done... for a long time. The new guys discovered the glitch, self-disclosed it to the Feds to minimize financial impact and got on the ball fixing things.
From all appearances, Chataqua could have had an identical problem. They just didn't handle the recovery as we did.
Again, not condoning anything, just trying to lend a little bit of insight that the furlough has given me. When I was flying the line, I used to get paired up with captains who thought every segment of the company was out to get us. As a pilot, I've learned that it's just not so. Every working stiff is bent over the barrel in one way or another in this industry.
#14
Spot on. When you are flying and you miss a crossing restriction, think of it as scoring a demerit. When you mess up interpreting how to schedule, perform or document a repetitive maintenance task, the demerits keep racking up until someone fixes your foul up.
For example, when ASA missed some engine borescope inspections on 90-something CRJs at C-check last year, I was riding the crew bus with a flock of hens, I mean flight attendants, and roosters, I mean pilots, who were clucking and crowing about the situation. They wanted our new Maintenance management team to get the ax.. immediately. It turns out, for whatever reason, our computer software didn't include the engine borescope inspection as part of the C-check work package, so it wasn't done... for a long time. The new guys discovered the glitch, self-disclosed it to the Feds to minimize financial impact and got on the ball fixing things.
For example, when ASA missed some engine borescope inspections on 90-something CRJs at C-check last year, I was riding the crew bus with a flock of hens, I mean flight attendants, and roosters, I mean pilots, who were clucking and crowing about the situation. They wanted our new Maintenance management team to get the ax.. immediately. It turns out, for whatever reason, our computer software didn't include the engine borescope inspection as part of the C-check work package, so it wasn't done... for a long time. The new guys discovered the glitch, self-disclosed it to the Feds to minimize financial impact and got on the ball fixing things.
From all appearances, Chataqua could have had an identical problem. They just didn't handle the recovery as we did.
Again, not condoning anything, just trying to lend a little bit of insight that the furlough has given me. When I was flying the line, I used to get paired up with captains who thought every segment of the company was out to get us. As a pilot, I've learned that it's just not so. Every working stiff is bent over the barrel in one way or another in this industry.
Again, not condoning anything, just trying to lend a little bit of insight that the furlough has given me. When I was flying the line, I used to get paired up with captains who thought every segment of the company was out to get us. As a pilot, I've learned that it's just not so. Every working stiff is bent over the barrel in one way or another in this industry.
I would agree with your theory if it encompassed a year or less of mx records, but in talking to our own MX, they agree that there's no way that such mistakes can go unnoticed for as long as they did in this case and in two different types. You working in maintenance yourself should know that. The bottom line is that the administrator determined that the inspections had not been done, and someone simply looked the other way.
Folks, just remember, it could always be your family in the back of these aircraft, there is no excuse for this level of stupidity.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: 320A
I want to know who decides the amount of the fine. Eagle was recently fined $2.9 million for flying 1100 flights with improperly repaired gear doors while Chautauqua was fined 348,000 for flying 27,700 flights with various inspections missing.
In other words Eagle was fined $2,636 per flight and Chautauqua was fined $12.56 per flight.
In other words Eagle was fined $2,636 per flight and Chautauqua was fined $12.56 per flight.
#16
This is very disappointing. I should never have to question my own safety when it comes to these planes. I think RAH is lucky this is the only setback(financial) they will suffer. The worst case scenario would be truly tragic.
#17
Is the union doing anything about it for you guys?
#19
Public memory is short. It was only last year the FAA was being slapped upside the head for being too cozy with the airlines. Babbitt, as a former airline pilot, can't be seen as ignoring those allegations.
How many here are comfortable with airlines being allowed to do maintenance inspections only when they feel like it?
How many here are comfortable with airlines being allowed to do maintenance inspections only when they feel like it?
#20
I want to know who decides the amount of the fine. Eagle was recently fined $2.9 million for flying 1100 flights with improperly repaired gear doors while Chautauqua was fined 348,000 for flying 27,700 flights with various inspections missing.
In other words Eagle was fined $2,636 per flight and Chautauqua was fined $12.56 per flight.
In other words Eagle was fined $2,636 per flight and Chautauqua was fined $12.56 per flight.
$348,000 for 27,700 flights with unairworthy aircraft
OR
$1,350,000 for ONE 50 pax flight that took over three hours to get airborne.
Just shows safety takes second to convenience.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



