Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Skywest Nov class 11/29

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2010 | 07:48 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Default

Aw, come on Newty! Didn't you take the FO's Oath?
Reply
Old 11-09-2010 | 08:33 PM
  #32  
Newty's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi
Aw, come on Newty! Didn't you take the FO's Oath?
I had my fingers crossed
Reply
Old 11-10-2010 | 05:49 AM
  #33  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,130
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Newty
I had my fingers crossed
Me too....
Reply
Old 11-10-2010 | 07:51 AM
  #34  
JustAMushroom's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Capt
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
At least in-house you can control it better. Living wage for FO's, six-figures for CA's and reasonable work rules. If that means that it's no longer economical to provide service to podunk falls, then the podunkians can either pay what the service is worth or take the bus. Greyhound can hire the regional pilots who don't make the cut...same job but no leadership or interpersonal skills required.
Not really... podunkians will fly another carrier who has RJ's and a cheap price and UA/CAL may get hammered in many mid size markets. That's the rub. Bring RJ's less that 70 seats "in-house" and everyone else will have a competative advantage.

That's why I predict UA/CAL will cave on 66 seat scope. The senior guys will get a nice raise and throw everyone trying to make it up the ladder under the bus.

SkyW doubled down on their RJ bet by buying Xjet (and ASA for that matter) and their share price keeps rising. I wounder what the insiders already know... hmmm???

Sorry about the tread-jacking.. as you were...
Reply
Old 11-10-2010 | 10:21 AM
  #35  
RJDio's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 671
Likes: 8
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by JustAMushroom
Not really... podunkians will fly another carrier who has RJ's and a cheap price and UA/CAL may get hammered in many mid size markets. That's the rub. Bring RJ's less that 70 seats "in-house" and everyone else will have a competative advantage.

That's why I predict UA/CAL will cave on 66 seat scope. The senior guys will get a nice raise and throw everyone trying to make it up the ladder under the bus.

SkyW doubled down on their RJ bet by buying Xjet (and ASA for that matter) and their share price keeps rising. I wounder what the insiders already know... hmmm???

Sorry about the tread-jacking.. as you were...
I see it a different way mushroom. Most of these Podunk towns are not served with 700's or 170's, rather by 50 seaters. The bigger rj's are used between major cities which doesnt make sense to me.

I predict 50+ seat rj's to come in house eventually and 50 seaters left alone. My guess for skywest buying xjt is they were cheap with guaranteed contracts.
Reply
Old 11-10-2010 | 12:19 PM
  #36  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,130
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by RJDio
The bigger rj's are used between major cities which doesnt make sense to me.
It makes sense at one level: frequency

Vacation travelers are flexible and might be happy with one daily option, but the business and premium travelers who are the bread-and-butter of hub-and-spoke will not tolerate a five hour hub sit to make their connection. Airport appreciation is for crews only, not customers.

Even though larger planes are more economical per seat, passengers prefer five or six daily flights rather than one or two. That, combined with lower wages for RJ crews, helps to tip the scales.

Until congestion and/or fuel prices force the airlines to move to fewer, larger airplanes, they will follow market demand. A mainline pilot group which brings RJ's in-house and then charges narrow-body wages to fly them might very well wind up non-competitive.
Reply
Old 11-10-2010 | 01:50 PM
  #37  
TBucket's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
A mainline pilot group which brings RJ's in-house and then charges narrow-body wages to fly them might very well wind up non-competitive.

I'm sorry, but you're going to tell me that even if they got $100 more per hour EACH, it would make them noncompetitive? Take a two-ish hour flight from EWR-ORD. You're telling me that the difference between profitable and uprofitable is $400? [EDIT: PROFANITY REMOVED]. That's a little over $5 a seat on a 76-seat RJ.. Take that raise down to something resembling the difference between your average RJ rate and what, say, united airbus crews make and it's laughable.

If $1.50 a ticket is the difference between your airline being profitable and failing, you're running it wrong. Period.

Last edited by rickair7777; 11-11-2010 at 06:35 AM.
Reply
Old 11-10-2010 | 07:52 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Default

Just for reference, does anybody remember that documentary a news reporter did about an average AA flight? Does anybody remember that, at the end, AA only made like $500 on the flight? So yes, $400 would make a difference, unfortunately.
Reply
Old 11-11-2010 | 02:57 AM
  #39  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Furlough/Gun Driver
Default

Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi
Just for reference, does anybody remember that documentary a news reporter did about an average AA flight? Does anybody remember that, at the end, AA only made like $500 on the flight? So yes, $400 would make a difference, unfortunately.
Raise ticket prices a few dollars
Reply
Old 11-11-2010 | 05:55 AM
  #40  
Newty's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dosbo
Raise ticket prices a few dollars
That would be too easy and passengers wouldn't notice or care, instead, charge em a 10$ fee for a seat cushion, and 5 dollars for overhead bin usage.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
meritflyer
ExpressJet
70
06-12-2008 09:05 PM
TwotterDriver
Regional
26
09-24-2007 08:59 AM
avi8tor4life
Regional
24
04-19-2007 10:58 PM
staplefork
Regional
72
02-12-2007 09:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices