Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Comair Flight 191

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2006 | 07:12 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by old gasser
Or the suggestion to add a maneuver to training syllabii to teach what to do if no V1 and no runway remaining.
Hey gasser, how could inserting a mistakenly short runway scenario into sim training hurt anything? It seems obvious that the pilots on this CRJ had a very quick decision and it is also painfully obvious that they chose improperly. Had they considered this scenario at some point in their training, I'm certain that they would have attempted an abort as soon as they recognized their plight. I've trained for a lot of types and PC's and I'm quite certain that I can accomplish a V1 cut with the best of em. I'm also certain that this crew could also accomplish the same go/no go decision with a positive outcome. But the scenario never included a real worry of runway overrun; it's always possible to either stop or continue. The situation yesterday morning was neither. It is NOT as simple as aborting if you lose an engine below V1. We've all trained for that. We've all seen it, and can react. Suddenly realizing that the runway is gone isn't something that anyone that I am aware of has ever trained for. These poor men were faced with a blink of the eye decision and they had ZERO prior experience on which to base that decision. So again, I ask you, how could slipping one of these deals into a sim ride at some point in training not help? Why would it be an inane idea?

I'm not pointing a finger, speculating or blaming. I'm just pointing out that they would have had a better chance of a positive outcome if they'd had some previous chance to contemplate the situation.

edit: I asume that they had zero prior training because I've never heard of this scenario in training and I've done my fair share of training. If anyone has ever heard of it, please let me know.
Reply
Old 08-28-2006 | 07:15 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
They were hauling @ss when they made that decision, it would not have been obvious that flying wouldn't work...
Given even two seconds to think about it, I'm sure that most well trained crews would not even think about trying to rotate below V1 or Vmu. However, I doubt that these men had so much as a split second to think.

But for the grace of God, there go I.
Reply
Old 08-28-2006 | 07:45 PM
  #113  
WorkinStiff's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: B737 Captain
Default

It must be nice to have that big "S" on your chest.



Originally Posted by rickair7777
I could get a fully loaded 200 airborne in 3500', if knew I had to do it in advance... But by the time they knew, the only possibilities would have been...

Pull it into the shaker...we are used to doing that in shear, but the absence of the AMI as a reference point would have almost certainly stopped the crew from doing that instinctively.

Throw in flaps 30, that should give you an instant boost, but you would then need pull into shaker to hold altitude after the initial A/S drop. Also you would need to violate ingrained training by changing configuration during a near-margins condition and also go through the flaps 30 gate...it would be hard to convince yourself to do stuff like that on the fly...
Reply
Old 08-29-2006 | 05:32 AM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Jet Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by skybolt
Hey gasser, how could inserting a mistakenly short runway scenario into sim training hurt anything? It seems obvious that the pilots on this CRJ had a very quick decision and it is also painfully obvious that they chose improperly. Had they considered this scenario at some point in their training, I'm certain that they would have attempted an abort as soon as they recognized their plight. I've trained for a lot of types and PC's and I'm quite certain that I can accomplish a V1 cut with the best of em. I'm also certain that this crew could also accomplish the same go/no go decision with a positive outcome. But the scenario never included a real worry of runway overrun; it's always possible to either stop or continue. The situation yesterday morning was neither. It is NOT as simple as aborting if you lose an engine below V1. We've all trained for that. We've all seen it, and can react. Suddenly realizing that the runway is gone isn't something that anyone that I am aware of has ever trained for. These poor men were faced with a blink of the eye decision and they had ZERO prior experience on which to base that decision. So again, I ask you, how could slipping one of these deals into a sim ride at some point in training not help? Why would it be an inane idea?

I'm not pointing a finger, speculating or blaming. I'm just pointing out that they would have had a better chance of a positive outcome if they'd had some previous chance to contemplate the situation.

edit: I asume that they had zero prior training because I've never heard of this scenario in training and I've done my fair share of training. If anyone has ever heard of it, please let me know.
The NTSB released some information regarding some of the conversation from the CVR. The spokeswoman (NTSB rep) stated that on the tape the captain called out V1 and VR. Based on what has been released so far, I wonder if they were even aware that the end of the runway was as close as it was.
Reply
Old 08-29-2006 | 05:47 AM
  #115  
fireman0174's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 1
From: Retired 121 pilot
Default

Originally Posted by skybolt
But for the grace of God, there go I.
There's the statement of the day.
Reply
Old 08-29-2006 | 05:53 AM
  #116  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: CL65/FO
Default

If it were me...
Reply
Old 08-29-2006 | 10:36 AM
  #117  
PILOTGUY's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Default

First off, I would like to say thank you to all of the kind words here from almost everyone. It is very appreciated.

To all of the other specially trained super secret agents here, just shut the hell up!! You were not there that day, so you know NOTHING! Information about Comair procedures on this form is wrong, the airport diagram is NOT accurate, flaps 30 gives you more drag than lift and would lower the nose,(thus reducing lift), and do not even get me started on how good the news media is. Armchair quaterbacks are not needed here.

If I had a dollar evertime a pilot has taxied onto the wrong runway or taken-off/landed on a TAXIWAY, I would be rich enough to retire. Please do not act like this is something new and you are special enough to provide the answer to the ONE fix or answer. Honeywell has already done that.
Reply
Old 08-29-2006 | 11:16 AM
  #118  
WorkinStiff's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: B737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by PILOTGUY
First off, I would like to say thank you to all of the kind words here from almost everyone. It is very appreciated.

To all of the other specially trained super secret agents here, just shut the hell up!! You were not there that day, so you know NOTHING! Information about Comair procedures on this form is wrong, the airport diagram is NOT accurate, flaps 30 gives you more drag than lift and would lower the nose,(thus reducing lift), and do not even get me started on how good the news media is. Armchair quaterbacks are not needed here.

If I had a dollar evertime a pilot has taxied onto the wrong runway or taken-off/landed on a TAXIWAY, I would be rich enough to retire. Please do not act like this is something new and you are special enough to provide the answer to the ONE fix or answer. Honeywell has already done that.
Well said. Now can we let this thread finally end?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Regional
23
01-14-2010 07:19 AM
RockBottom
Regional
3
06-05-2008 04:44 PM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 09:07 AM
RockBottom
Regional
0
08-17-2005 12:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices