AA/AE New/Old news?
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
From: GV Captain
Whereas the APA and the Company have agreed that in the future, Commuter Air Carriers operating under Section 1.D. of the Agreement shall utilize only aircraft that are not certificated in the United States or Europe with a maximum passenger capacity of more than 50 seats and that are not certificated in any country with a maximum gross takeoff weight of more than 64,500 pounds;
Whereas American Eagle Airlines currently has twenty five CRJ-700 aircraft in service or on firm order, and also has options on an additional twenty five CRJ-700 aircraft:
Now, therefore, the parties hereby agree to the following:
1. The Company and APA shall have one year from May 2003 to meet and negotiate in good faith the transfer of the CRJ-700 aircraft currently in service, on order, or on option at American Eagle to the Company’s operating certificate in a manner that shall be cost-neutral as to labor costs under collective bargaining agreements.
2. The APA hereby grants to the Company an exception from the 50 seat and 64,500 pound limitations on aircraft at American Eagle for the CRJ-700 aircraft during the time period of negotiations pursuant to paragraph 1, above, and for one year after reaching agreement with the APA under paragraph 1, above, in order to effect the transfer to the Company’s operating certificate of all CRJ-700 aircraft operated by the Company or an Affiliate.
3. If the parties do not reach agreement under paragraph 1 of this agreement, the APA grants to the Company an exception from the 50 seat and 64,500 pound limitations on aircraft at American Eagle specifically for the CRJ-700s currently in use, on order or on option as of the signing of this letter. This exception is for a maximum of fifty (50) CRJ700 aircraft with the understanding that the cancellation, transfer or expiration of any of the current (as of DOS) orders or options reduces this maximum number by a like amount.
For the American Airlines, Inc. For the APA
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Latest from the MEC. Now they're talking about AMR maintaining possession of the aircraft after divestiture and extending travel benefits to all divested employees for five years.
That doesn't sound good.
American Eagle Airlines
MEC Hotline
03/25/11
We are also continuing to move forward on the legal front by challenging AMR’s expressed desire to take ownership of Eagle’s aircraft prior to a divestiture.
That doesn't sound good.
American Eagle Airlines
MEC Hotline
03/25/11
We are also continuing to move forward on the legal front by challenging AMR’s expressed desire to take ownership of Eagle’s aircraft prior to a divestiture.
AMR has played shell games for years with AA vs. Eagle. In the past the mainline was harmed financially by having to bear costs incurred by Eagle. It sounds like the pendulum is about to turn the other way and the Eagle MEC doesn't like the turn of events. Get used to it, it's just business.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
But the MEC is proactive, they like to be first in line for concessions. Why has no other employee group at eagle been approached for negotiations and concession? because they know the ALPA MEC at eagle is spineless and useless. I am waiting for the DFR to come out of this, because these people are so stupid it is just a matter of time.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Right seat, left seat, right seat, left seat....?
AMR has played shell games for years with AA vs. Eagle. In the past the mainline was harmed financially by having to bear costs incurred by Eagle. It sounds like the pendulum is about to turn the other way and the Eagle MEC doesn't like the turn of events. Get used to it, it's just business.
Absolutely. Just business. The problem is for us Eagle drivers that we can't predict our very near future. Pretty frustrating and very stressful for some of us. The really crappy thing about the entire deal is that even if AMR just spun us off and liquidated the company, it would just be business. But it would be unprecedented in the regional airline industry to just close an entire airline without it going through bankruptcy. Well, some company has to set precedent I guess.
Liquidations is the inference I get from AMR keeping the planes after spinning us off. And the five year travel benefit sounds like a severance package. I hope I'm wrong.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



