One list, one voice, one contract
#11
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
I'd be willing to bet a good amount of dough that we're voting on a TA by this time next year if not earlier, and we'll be amalgamated in 2013. We aren't doing a full blown contract, just cleaning up the trash in our important sections were 96% of the grievances originate. FAPA is once again feeding you info that is slanted. fighting us tooth n nail on everything does have a cost at the end of the day, and it's us trusting you. No "native" RAH pilot trusts FAPA, or anything that smells like FAPA.
#12
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 987
Likes: 37
How can one reason with this kind of senseless rambling? Do we need to define what a fence is again, and how that will prevent this illusive "seat grab"?
#13
exactly. It's not a seat grab at all. It has more to do with protecting the F9 guys from themselves because they don't know this management at all. I could care less about what aircraft I'm flying if I'm paid well and have good work rules. We want them on board with us, not separated from us.
#14
This is the IBT.
When offered a chance to speak with 100 pilots in a room, they would rather speak to each 100 on an individual basis, with no one else around.
The IBT has nothing to offer, so they rely on scaring their own membership and avoiding everyone else at all cost.
Once again, for everyone to ponder...
Here is the list of pilot groups that have "chosen" the IBT....
Go Jet
Gulfstream
Horizon
Republic
Omni
USA 3000
World
ABX
Amerijet
Atlas
Flight Options
Kalitta
Miami Air
I understand why the IBT likes to call themselves a "cargo pilots" union (as long as you are not Fedex or UPS).
How many Legacy Carriers does the IBT represent? NONE
How many Major Airlines does the IBT represtent? NONE
How many LCC's does the IBT represnt? NONE
If the IBT is so great, why do they not represent any of the jobs that most of us are trying to obtain?
When offered a chance to speak with 100 pilots in a room, they would rather speak to each 100 on an individual basis, with no one else around.
The IBT has nothing to offer, so they rely on scaring their own membership and avoiding everyone else at all cost.
Once again, for everyone to ponder...
Here is the list of pilot groups that have "chosen" the IBT....
Go Jet
Gulfstream
Horizon
Republic
Omni
USA 3000
World
ABX
Amerijet
Atlas
Flight Options
Kalitta
Miami Air
I understand why the IBT likes to call themselves a "cargo pilots" union (as long as you are not Fedex or UPS).
How many Legacy Carriers does the IBT represent? NONE
How many Major Airlines does the IBT represtent? NONE
How many LCC's does the IBT represnt? NONE
If the IBT is so great, why do they not represent any of the jobs that most of us are trying to obtain?
How many legacy carriers are represented by the same union that also represents the regional they outsource to? Quite a few. 2 years ago most of us would have been more than open to an in house union. However that time has come and gone. We may be "inexperienced regional guys", but you need to know that we understand our management and their tactics more than you do.
#15
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
I'm sure D.B. would have answered all of your questions... oh wait, that's right, YOUR FAPA leadership said D.B. was specifically NOT invited to talk with the crews and answer questions.
And before you go into one of your "rants," please check out one of the posts regarding the matter (can't remember if it was on this message board or "the other one"). The email chain is there for all to read.
And before you go into one of your "rants," please check out one of the posts regarding the matter (can't remember if it was on this message board or "the other one"). The email chain is there for all to read.
"To date, neither FAPA, nor our members have ever been told why IBT representation under your leadership at Local 357 will be beneficial to our interests or an improvement to FAPA.* We are entirely uninformed as to how it will improve our job security, career progression, rates of pay, working conditions, benefits, administration and enforcement of our CBA, or quality of life.
*You have also asserted a desire to simply provide your message to FAPA members.* While you are upset that we did not provide you the direct contact information you requested (which ALPA and UTU also did not provide to you) we invite you to speak directly, in person with our members.*
*We invite you to Denver to speak with a meeting of our members in the first week of June between the 7th and 10th.* We will arrange a meeting in the FAPA offices in Denver for you to share your message with Frontier Pilots.* We would like to set up several times over two days so we can give you the opportunity to speak to the largest possible number. We will also arrange a time for you to meet in MKE with pilots from our MKE domicile.* We think it is very important for you to understand the views of our members and for them to hear why you believe FAPA is so bad, and IBT is so good for them. Feel free to bring another EXCO member along with you.* As part of this invitation, we ask that you provide FAPA the same opportunity to speak with your members at the different domiciles to provide our view of why the Council structure we are proposing in the election is in the best interests of all parties.* Good open honest communication should be the goal.*
*A number of your recent communications to your membership have been forwarded to us in recent weeks. Many of these contain information that is quite negative towards me personally, FAPA leadership and advisors in general, and frankly, quite inaccurate regarding our actions and objectives.* Despite that, you profess to be interested in unity and honesty. *Rather than seeking an accommodation of the interests of hundreds of Frontier Pilots the intent seems to be on forcing IBT representation on our members.* Please understand that we will challenge the accuracy of the statements you have been making. We would like to have an open and honest discussion on those matters and the issues of representation."
Gannon could have brought the entire Exco if he wanted, instead he chose to bring Bourne and Turner.
FAPA wanted to hear from 357. We keep herring about how great the 357 is and how much they have to offer.
We invite 357, and the 357 brings 747 and AD.
I thought you guys were practically independent?
Bad choice by Pat, a majority of our pilots do not participate in message boards and he really could have made a positive impact by speaking to the group.
#16
exactly. It's not a seat grab at all. It has more to do with protecting the F9 guys from themselves because they don't know this management at all. I could care less about what aircraft I'm flying if I'm paid well and have good work rules. We want them on board with us, not separated from us.
T5
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



