Colgan Rumor
#51
What if everyone worked for free, and a profit sharing plan was put in place so that after the Execs took their cut, the rest would be spread amongst the rest of the employees?
I would hate for the Pinnacle BOD to let half the airline basically evaporate just because their pilots get an extra buck an hour.
I would hate for the Pinnacle BOD to let half the airline basically evaporate just because their pilots get an extra buck an hour.
I could finally bring my parrot, eye patch and peg leg to work! Arrghhh!
#52
Why are the lawsuits being brought up? Has anyone stopped to think about whats really going on? Colgan isn't making money, plain and simple. Why else would mgmt be in talks with Unitacon? They need to get the Q rates to a place where they are profitable. Phildo underbid those planes so bad that they are virtually losing money every time they fly. This is hardly a scare tactic until mgmt comes out and publishes it. Until then its a rumor by definition. Guys, the bottom line is this, Pinnacle is in trouble and its time to face the realities of not what will happen, but what could happen. The Q's and Saabs aren't making enough money for the company, the 900's of 9E and the Q's are assets and assets can be liquidated. If we go bankrupt they could disappear and if the company shows enough cause then and out of senority furlough is a real possibility. ALPA can do all they want but a judge has the final say. I hope it doesnt come to that, but it could. If this was all a scam our stock price wouldnt be under a dollar. Anything can happen.
#53
Why are the lawsuits being brought up? Has anyone stopped to think about whats really going on? Colgan isn't making money, plain and simple. Why else would mgmt be in talks with Unitacon? They need to get the Q rates to a place where they are profitable. Phildo underbid those planes so bad that they are virtually losing money every time they fly. This is hardly a scare tactic until mgmt comes out and publishes it. Until then its a rumor by definition. Guys, the bottom line is this, Pinnacle is in trouble and its time to face the realities of not what will happen, but what could happen. The Q's and Saabs aren't making enough money for the company, the 900's of 9E and the Q's are assets and assets can be liquidated. If we go bankrupt they could disappear and if the company shows enough cause then and out of senority furlough is a real possibility. ALPA can do all they want but a judge has the final say. I hope it doesnt come to that, but it could. If this was all a scam our stock price wouldnt be under a dollar. Anything can happen.
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Continenal, United, Delta, and American scope apply to any aircraft on a certificate. The only airline that does not care what you fly for anybody else on the certificate is US Airways.
What is probably going to happen, however, is United management will prevail and United scope will be the scope in the new contract for UAL. Continental management has tried (and failed) to get rid of the 50 seat restriction for years.
#55
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
#56
I agree 100%. Don't take this to the bank, but I've had numerous conversations, or interogations rather, with a handful of the reps here at 9E and they're telling me its not a straight up 5% paycut up front. My understanding is that they are trying to achieve a 5% cut on overall labor expenses and the MEC is trying to find the least invasive ways of doing so. I may be wrong, but I dont see it as a 5% hourly wage cut, hence why renegotiating section 24 has become a concentration.
#57
I agree. I think the 5% may be part of any deal with Delta or Ucal
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
I've thought all along that the 5% has little to do with cost savings but is directed at other "stakeholders" so managment can say the employees (i.e. pilots) are taking pay cuts and making an investment in the company.
#59
Consider this. If you take a 5% paycut, once you enter bankruptcy and it's time to cut your rates again, the judge isn't going to take into consideration your pre-5% cut rates, he's going to cut further from your pay rate at the time bankruptcy is filed. The 5% won't matter.
Nothing good can come from taking a paycut. It will not save the company from bankruptcy no matter how loud they cry that it will.
Nothing good can come from taking a paycut. It will not save the company from bankruptcy no matter how loud they cry that it will.
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
From: AN124 FE
Consider this. If you take a 5% paycut, once you enter bankruptcy and it's time to cut your rates again, the judge isn't going to take into consideration your pre-5% cut rates, he's going to cut further from your pay rate at the time bankruptcy is filed. The 5% won't matter.
Nothing good can come from taking a paycut. It will not save the company from bankruptcy no matter how loud they cry that it will.
Nothing good can come from taking a paycut. It will not save the company from bankruptcy no matter how loud they cry that it will.
Trying to make it look like we all play ball thus getting the mainline mgmt to agree to our new terms. Again all of it is complete BS to begin with but the situation is peculiar. Like some are saying listen to all the information first. It seems the bankruptcy is their scare tactic towards UCAL, if you dont give us our options we will park EVERYTHING in IAH and EWR leaving you a nice big hole to fill. It seems like if we can get mlre money out of UCAL and Daddy D it wont get to the BK point. All remains to be seen and is a Charlie Foxtrot whichever way you look at it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



