![]() |
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 3525575)
Even if it does pass, remember it would kick the can down the road 2 years (my guess only half will work the extra time, so effectively 1 year).
So it would delay some hiring / allow catch up to take place for a year. The massive retirement numbers over the next decade will not be wiped out. They will still require massive hiring. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3525291)
Be interesting to see if there's any kind of shift after mid terms.
|
Originally Posted by mainlineAF
(Post 3525599)
3 years. it's age 68. it's like saying now we have to retire at 64.
Here is whatever the bill says: What the legislation doesThe Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act would raise the mandatory pilot retirement age from 65 to 67. |
Originally Posted by BlueMoon
(Post 3525600)
Congress will be too busy doing BS investigations to be bothered with governing.
|
Happy December
Absolutely no, none, zero, progress on this bill. 3% chance of being passed, no changes https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/s4607 |
Originally Posted by hercretired
(Post 3546137)
Happy December
Absolutely no, none, zero, progress on this bill. 3% chance of being passed, no changes https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/s4607 What is cited to actually states: “Odds of passage “The House version has attracted seven cosponsors, all Republicans. It awaits a potential vote in the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. “The Senate version has attracted five cosponsors, all Republicans. It awaits a potential vote in the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee. “Odds of passage are difficult to predict. “On one hand, both chambers’ versions have only achieved Republican cosponsorship to date, at a time when Democrats control both chambers. On the other hand, the 2007 law raising the retirement age by five years — more than twice the two-year raise this legislation proposes — proved noncontroversial, passing 390–0 in the House and by unanimous consent in the Senate.” |
|
With Republicans now controlling the house, why hasn't this bill come up for a vote?
|
Originally Posted by mcdonald
(Post 3607911)
With Republicans now controlling the house, why hasn't this bill come up for a vote?
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3525291)
Be interesting to see if there's any kind of shift after mid terms.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:22 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands