Respectful RAH/Frontier Pilot Conversation
 

This is a test to determine whether or not it is possible to have a respectful and constructive conversation between "native" Republic pilots and Frontier Airlines pilots.

Go for it. Only 9 more respectful posts and I'll be proven wrong.:)

Does anyone respect RAH?

Should they? :p

Thanks for the attempt. Do you think I need to post this aboutb7 more times

I took an RAH jumpseater on my aircraft lanyard and all. Even went out of my way to get him a bottle of water. He was not expecting it at all.
RAH Bro's and Sis's you are welcome on my aircraft anytime.
8 more to go. We will negate post 2 and 3

would you still expect an rah pilot (lanyard and all), to stop by the cockpit on a company deadhead?

Yes! Another crew resource in the back. A simple hello would suffice. " Hello I am RAH Bro/Sis and I am deadheading in the back. Seat X, if you need any assistance I would be glad to help." Our two companies have different views on this. Respect ours and I will respect yours. 6 more to go!

Double or nothing if we make it to 20? Or do you feel safer taking the $10.00? Kind of like Deal or No Deal.

I'll see what I can do about getting Samballs avitar to hand deliver to you.

Just create and account on the IBT message board and you can have much more success than you will here.

Too bad, was a good try. But it seems we have our winner here.

You know how we (99% of F9 pilots) feel about that (ibt). I will NEVER join ibt. They were forced upon us.

Since the law says I must pay for them to represent me (:rolleyes:), I will pay for that - as a dues paying Objector Only; but Not a penny more, and again - NEVER as a member.

The lanyard thing is somewhat childish. I have taken many rah/bros on My jumpseat with them wearing their/your ibt lanyard. I have Never denied them a seat for that or any other reason.

I also have ridden in the rah/bro's rj's JS, without wearing anything union or association related. Why?

Because common courtsey reveals how much of a 'slap in the face' it is to either party. Maybe this is where the maturity lies. idk.

I does appear though that Mulva was correct in that APC does seem to attract many Griefers and the like.