Colgan or Republic?
02-18-2012 | 08:22 AM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,494
Likes: 502
02-18-2012 | 08:28 AM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,494
Likes: 502
While Shy brings up the dreaded and absolute worst case scenario; he's not wrong.
But United has made it clear they want the Qs. I would put money on it that they're not going anywhere. And I'd say with confidence that we'll get more when we start parking the super-slaabs ... Whenever that may be.
But United has made it clear they want the Qs. I would put money on it that they're not going anywhere. And I'd say with confidence that we'll get more when we start parking the super-slaabs ... Whenever that may be.
Also, your scenario needs to have numbers attached to it. 31 Qs, minus 31 Saabs, and then the potential plus 5 Qs. I still count a negative 26 aircraft.
02-18-2012 | 08:54 AM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
From: AN124 FE
United can still have Qs, but nothing says they have to be at Colgan. Have you seen the windown agreement? While I haven't, there's no doubt it gives United the flexibility to find another Q operator (my bet would be Commutair) to slowly start taking deliveries with financing from Bombardier/United and at cheaper rates than Pinnacle Corp. That's the whole point of a wind down agreement, it allows the legacy carrier options to find new regional operators with a reasonable timeframe.
Also, your scenario needs to have numbers attached to it. 31 Qs, minus 31 Saabs, and then the potential plus 5 Qs. I still count a negative 26 aircraft.
Also, your scenario needs to have numbers attached to it. 31 Qs, minus 31 Saabs, and then the potential plus 5 Qs. I still count a negative 26 aircraft.
02-18-2012 | 09:26 AM
#36
Line Holder
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
ShyGuy... It's not your flying,
it's your attitude.
The enemy's dangerous, but right now
you're worse. You're dangerous and foolish.
You may not like the guys flying with you, they may not like you
but whose side are you on?
it's your attitude.
The enemy's dangerous, but right now
you're worse. You're dangerous and foolish.
You may not like the guys flying with you, they may not like you
but whose side are you on?
Last edited by Prancinghorse; 02-18-2012 at 01:23 PM.
02-18-2012 | 09:32 AM
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
02-18-2012 | 11:01 AM
#38
Bracing for Fallacies
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
02-18-2012 | 12:59 PM
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,494
Likes: 502
Everyone is detracting from the original thread topic. The original poster asked about Republic vs Colgan, and we would be doing him a disservice if we didn't at least bring to light the fact that the CEO has mentioned all our props are running on a loss, and if we don't come to an agreement with United, the Colgan flying could be cut. Nothing is official, but the OP needs to know that.
02-18-2012 | 01:01 PM
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
From: AN124 FE
Everyone is detracting from the original thread topic. The original poster asked about Republic vs Colgan, and we would be doing him a disservice if we didn't at least bring to light the fact that the CEO has mentioned all our props are running on a loss, and if we don't come to an agreement with United, the Colgan flying could be cut. Nothing is official, but the OP needs to know that.
Republic may be losing some CHQ flying too on the CO side and Frontier and they have furloughed the past 2 winters... It is a total crap shoot
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
