Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Three failed check rides @ Xjet? >

Three failed check rides @ Xjet?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Three failed check rides @ Xjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2012 | 12:25 PM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hc0fitted
No dude, He is not confused about anything. A in house Part 141 EOC that is going to result in you receiving a certificate, or ratting after successful completion is just like going up with a DPE. If you fail it you may not get the pink slip but it will go on your record at OKC and can be easily looked up. Of course "stage checks " don't count against you because its the equivalent of just going up with your instructor for a another lesson in the PT 61 world. Thats why you saying doing your training 141 is better than 61 solely because of that fact that none of your training can go on your record is stupid/false. BTW I did training both 61 and 141.
That must be a change then in the last 10 years. Back when I did all my flying they billed 141 training at the university level as not being reported to the faa as something that would go on your record.
Reply
Old 03-21-2012 | 12:39 PM
  #42  
WhistlePig's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 489
Likes: 1
From: Ending the Backlog one claim at a time
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Blame our court savvy society. No families are coming after Jordan for a few million because he missed the game winning shot and 50 people died.

All you say can be true, and there can be others who shouldn't be behind the controls of an airplane carrying paying customers, but because of that same system that you complain about in public school, if you have enough money to continue to train, then you too can eventually succeed!

Liability is a dangerous animal in our legal system.

USMCFLYR
The courts can only enforce the laws passed by congress and the agency regulations written to make those laws operable. If you don't like the regs, don't blame your lawyer, blame your elected representative.
Reply
Old 03-22-2012 | 03:43 AM
  #43  
Citation X driver
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: citation x driver
Default

I just noticed they posted another round of job openings on willflyforfood, any idea what it takes to get your file pulled from airlineapps? I've met all the requirements, but do have two speeding tickets over a span of 5 years. Surely that wouldn’t bust me?
Reply
Old 03-22-2012 | 03:59 AM
  #44  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by WhistlePig
The courts can only enforce the laws passed by congress and the agency regulations written to make those laws operable. If you don't like the regs, don't blame your lawyer, blame your elected representative.
No where in my post did I blame lawyers. I said the court savvy society. This is the whole enchilada. Don't worry, I have plenty of blame in mind for our elected officials too (juries figure in here pretty high also).

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 03-22-2012 | 05:28 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Default

The question is correlation between checkride failures and negative overall performance. For some there's no correlation. Akin to the SAT, GRE, LSAT, etc. Not everyone who flubs a standardized test will flunk out of grad school, etc. Some don't test well. Yet, some will be denied admission because of standardized test performance. It does not take into account motivation, willingness to improve, luck, etc.

I spent 4,000 hours as a CFI in part 61 schools and was floored by those that failed a ride vs. those that passed. In some cases I would put money on a pass. Result...fail. Others that technically met the PTS but barely...pass.
Before long I could give you the examiner's oral question verbatim. Trained two pilots that are now at majors that I consider excellent pilots that failed checkrides. One Chandelled through a cloud on a commercial (a dubious decision given the ceiling) the other got confused on an NDB hold (the old school stuff - no RMI. Remember the "when the intercept angle equals the deflection"?)

Point is whether checkrides are a predictor of performance. For some it is. Others, a lousy bad break.
Reply
Old 03-22-2012 | 07:05 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: CFI/II/MEI
Default

To me it should depend on the rides failed on a case by case basis.

What if someone failed their private and instrument, when they were a sub-100 hour pilot, then later on their CFI initial? Are the failures at the <100 hour level indicative of what kind of pilot they are once they hit 1000+ hours of TT, and have saved their a$$ multiple times while instructing?

I've become even more cynical of checkrides since I started instructing. I have seen students that I was so sure would pass, I would have bet my hard earned cash on them. They even passed their 141 grad-ride with flying colors and then failed the checkride with the DPE over something completely stupid. Then I had a couple students that I was really nervous about signing off, and that barely passed the grad-ride by the skin of their teeth. But then took the checkride with the DPE and not only passed, but the DPE acted like they were super amazing pilots and god's gift to aviation. It is really mind boggling. I only have one hook and its my CFI initial, but after seeing what I have seen as an instructor, the fact that I never failed any of my other rides is probably as almost as dependent on luck as it was on my piloting skill. Checkride passage/failure can be so subjective and even dependent on the whims of that examiner on that particular day at that particular time.

Also, the whole CFI initial thing bothers the hell out of me. (maybe because it is the only blemish on my record) The FAA doesn't view the CFI certs as pilot certificates. Also, there are a good number of people who have gone to the airlines without becoming a CFI, thus not having to take that gamble. The national average is that something like 70-80% of applicants fail their CFI initial. At the local FSDO here, there was one FAA examiner that would fail everyone on their oral once and then their ride once. In addition to handing out two failures to each applicant, he would turn around and 709 the CFI that signed the applicant off. As a result of that, our school started sending CFI applicants to another FSDO, and our POI threatened to pull our 141 status for doing that. Absolutely ridiculous.
Reply
Old 03-22-2012 | 08:16 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bellanca
The national average is that something like 70-80% of applicants fail their CFI initial.
Agree with everything you said except for this. This is the most common misconception out there.

US Civil Airmen Statistics

The national average is nowhere near that. Table 19 and 20 show that CFI applicants nationwide have over a 70% pass rate on first attempt.
Reply
Old 03-22-2012 | 09:15 AM
  #48  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 76
Default

I'd have a great record if it wasn't for my CFI rides.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vader
Career Questions
85
02-17-2011 12:04 PM
CaptainTeezy
Part 135
8
01-12-2011 10:33 AM
INXS
Major
11
05-29-2009 04:27 PM
Tech Maven
Money Talk
0
02-27-2007 06:30 PM
mike734
Flight Schools and Training
12
01-29-2007 09:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices