![]() |
Originally Posted by sticky
(Post 1160436)
no, youre grown up tattletale worm
Originally Posted by sticky
(Post 1160436)
who intends to work against those fighting to improve their working conditions.
Fight your fight. I hope you achieve your objectives. I've said that many times before and I really do mean it. I just don't want to be part of the collateral damage as you guys nuke your way to success. |
Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
(Post 1160427)
Coming from a pilot group that only knows how to give concessions?
CONCESSIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can we just http://images.fanpop.com/images/imag...8351_75_75.jpgon those topics? I feel like I'm back in 1st grade today! |
Originally Posted by Mulva
(Post 1160458)
SCOPE!!!!!!!!!!!
CONCESSIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can we just http://images.fanpop.com/images/imag...8351_75_75.jpgon those topics? I feel like I'm back in 1st grade today! |
Originally Posted by sticky
(Post 1160466)
"This coming from the guy acting like a pouting child. "Boo hoo hoo, theres a shinny airbus in the background of a one of the pictures! Im calling daddy bedford and he'll show you!"
Bummer, too long for a signature. Still going to print and frame though. |
Originally Posted by ThrustMonkey
(Post 1160362)
LOA 67 was and is illegal. End of story.
|
Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
(Post 1160374)
Bolo. I am very much informed. The letters that the company released were entirely to make us look bad to the other work groups and apparently you are naive enough to believe them. Just wait and see what happens the first time you guys actually stand up to Bedford
There have been a number of instances where FAPA "stood up" to Bedford. There is one event in particular that is so incredibly awesome that I CAN"T WAIT for it to become public information. You guys will sh1t kittens at the dollars involved. Once again, pounding your fist just doesn't work at the big boy table. |
Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
(Post 1160222)
Mulva. In the history of airline negotiations has there EVER been a pilot group that would intentionally destruct another pilot groups efforts to a new contract like your friends at fapa have done?
You do realize that RAH offered EMB 190 rates to FAPA during LOA 67 negotiations, don't you? The rates were higher in every seat and longevity year than both your current rates and the rates recently offered by the company. FAPA said thanks but no thanks. I am sure you will find something wrong with that decision as well. |
This is getting a bit too childish, but I do want to comment on the fact that the company disclosed some letters, and the ensuing reaction by some of the F9 guys on this board.
You guys (F9) like to point out that the Local357 is continuously deceiving its membership. Everything out of their mouth is somehow twisted. This is very much based on the fact that you guys don't like the situation you're in (understandable), and more importantly, it seems, based on what management is presenting to be the facts. Has it ever occurred to you that it is in fact management that is twisting the facts? This is a very hard concept to even fathom considering the fact that in the history of aviation airline management has never lied, never cheated, never misguided it's pilots for managements benefit. It's always been greedy pilots, in fact, the IBT was always secretly behind it all, pulling the strings. Well, best of luck either way. |
Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
(Post 1160427)
Coming from a pilot group that only knows how to give concessions?
|
Originally Posted by sticky
(Post 1160436)
no, youre grown up tattletale worm who intends to work against those fighting to improve their working conditions.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:18 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands