Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
If RAH Pilots are Released to Strike..... >

If RAH Pilots are Released to Strike.....

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

If RAH Pilots are Released to Strike.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2012 | 06:26 PM
  #31  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by seafeye
The probation period is not an open shut case for employers. They still need just cause to terminate an employee. I bet if you hired some lawyers they could argue that the 12 month period is too long and unconstitutional. Trial periods were created to find out if an employee is able to do their job, not as a firing tool.
I completely agree with your post but i firmly believe that the probation period has been used inappropriately.
Reply
Old 05-13-2012 | 06:28 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mikehoncho

Oskeewowow can't wait to get away from Frontier as much as Frontier can't wait to get away from RAH? I'm sure that's correct right up to the part that concerns jumping into the Airbus.
I'm a tier III guy. The only F9 pilots behind be on the master list are the ones hired in the last year. I'll never touch a F9 Airbus. Partly due to seniority, partly by choice. I hope to be long gone by the time the fence comes down anyways.

As far as defending probationary pilots goes, I'll say that the last two administrations have a good track record of sticking up for new guys. To the best of their abilities.
Reply
Old 05-13-2012 | 06:40 PM
  #33  
slumav505's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 CA
Default

The union will have your back. I'd be more worries about paying your bills on our awful first year pay. Hard to build up a slush fund. Good bees is you can get on at Lowes and not lose too much coin.
Reply
Old 05-13-2012 | 06:48 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hetman
Pretty much the same thing(s) they would receive under the Frontier contract.
Probationary Frontier pilots don't (or didn't under FAPA) pay dues. They could file grievances, they were entitled to representation but not SBA. Is that pretty much what 357's probationary pilots get?
Reply
Old 05-13-2012 | 06:53 PM
  #35  
Mulva's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: A-320 Asst. Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by dav8or
How many F9 pilots have joined and are paying dues?
You would need to ask the 357 the exact number, but the majority of F9 pilots appear to be paying Fair Share/Core Fees as required. By doing so, those paying the fees are electing not to become a member of the Teamsters Local 357, but are paying that, in theory,are related to negotiating collective bargaining agreements, representing unit members in grievance and arbitration proceedings and administering collective bargaining agreements.

Per the Teamsters Local 357 POLICY AND PROCEDURE ON FAIR SHARE/CORE FEE:

A non-member employee may pay reduced dues and fees that are attributable only to those union activities that are germane to collective bargaining. This "fair share fee" is based upon the union's expenditures in performing its duties as the exclusive representative of employees in dealing with employers on labor/management issues and can be implemented by following the steps set forth in this Policy and Procedure.

IBT is not relieved of the their obligations to represent all employees fairly, in good faith, and without discrimination.

So it really doesn't matter "How many F9 pilots have joined and are paying dues." What matters is that the IBT is the EXCLUSIVE bargaining representative for all pilots under the RAH umbrella right now and Bolo is alluding to the fact that they, so far, have done a very poor job in the eyes of F9 pilots. Especially when you consider that the Teamsters have taken actions that are directly opposed to the interests of Frontier pilots, a few of which are actually full fledged members.
Reply
Old 05-13-2012 | 07:27 PM
  #36  
SeaRider's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 309
Likes: 6
From: Guppy gear slinger
Default

Emma,

I would tune out the F9 guys in this thread. They just love to jump at a chance to badmouth IBT and will always dislike them - no matter what they do. Their opinions of IBT has absolutely nothing to do with your question. Historically, when an agreement is reached after a strike, it includes a stipulation to give any 'fired' probationary pilots their jobs back with no penalty.

I strongly feel our union does very little to look out for the junior pilots on the list, however I don't think for a moment an agreement would be reached that would leave probationary pilots on the street. I really wouldn't sweat it. Besides, I doubt we will actually get the chance to walk, and if we do, it would be for a matter of hours. Supposedly, Delta has threatened our fixed-fee flying contract if the company cancels even one flight due to labor unrest. I don't see our management, as incompetent as they are, allowing our Delta contract to be in jeopardy over this. It would hurt their pocketbooks too much.

Cheers,

SR
Reply
Old 05-14-2012 | 03:57 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default

Say what you will about BB's management abilities, but after the contract/strike is behind RAH, they will be looking to get back to business as quickly as possible.

Yes - they will likely fire you for not showing up and for not crossing the picket line.
Yes - they will almost certainly take you back
immediately after the contract is signed.They have $30K or more wrapped up in you, common sense say they will take you back.

Here is the real question -- when you are directly asked the question on any application or in any interview, "Have you ever been fired from a job?" do you really want to have to do that dance?

Be smart -- Stay away from RAH until this thing is over. Every pilot that goes somewhere else right now is bringing RAH management closer to offering a reasonable contract. The now 5 year expired contract at RAH is one of the many things keeping the industry wages and qol down right now. Do the right thing and apply elsewhere. Going to work at RAH right now is supporting Management and hurting the RAH pilots and this industry.
Reply
Old 05-14-2012 | 04:00 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IA1125
Probationary Frontier pilots don't (or didn't under FAPA) pay dues. They could file grievances, they were entitled to representation but not SBA. Is that pretty much what 357's probationary pilots get?
Yes, with two exceptions.

First, new hires are required to pay the initiation fee and dues (or association fee if they choose not to be a member.) I don't know which is the norm in the airline industry, but it is (was) good that FAPA did not require dues payments from probationary pilots.

Secondly, the RAH contract specifically states that pilots can be fired without cause. Management actually did fire 125 probationary Saab guys back in 2001 rather than incur the training costs of furloughing in seniority order.

Granted, those are pretty significant exceptions, but beyond that, it is pretty much the same.

That being said, I reiterate that a back to work agreement post strike is outside the scope of the probation language in the contract. While I am no longer at RAH, when I was there I worked pretty closely with PG & co. I have no reason to believe they would even consider an agreement that did not include reinstatement of any probationary pilots fired for not crossing the line.

So in answer to the OP: No, under no circumstances should you ever cross a picket line for any reason. I cannot say with absolute certainty you will be reinstated through a back to work agreement if taken hostage, but based on my knowledge of the EXCO at RAH I am as close to absolutely certain as I can get. But crossing the line and keeping your job would be infinitely worse than honoring the line and losing it.

But also keep in mind, before you show up for class, that most everyone who is at RAH now is trying to get out. I was a very senior captain there until I bailed a year ago. I took the first offer I got, with a 60% pay cut, and have not for a minute regretted my decision.

There are rumors of furlough where I am now and my head will certainly be on the block if that happens. I would rather be furloughed from here than be a senior captain there. YMMV

Last edited by Hetman; 05-14-2012 at 04:20 AM.
Reply
Old 05-14-2012 | 05:42 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Hetmen, very well spoken. I hope you do not get furloughed and congratulations on getting out of RAH. I have been furloughed twice and once out of seniority which totally sucked and was total BS.
The majority of the people have had good advice and really the best answers seem to be: 1) Stay away from RAH until this mess is resolved. 2) If you cannot stay away DO NOT CROSS THE PICKET LINE IF THEY STRIKE!

BOLO
Reply
Old 05-14-2012 | 06:16 AM
  #40  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

Emma,

I can tell you with certainty that RAH management will not hesitate to pull the plug on probationary employees if a strike is called, and it would not surprise me in the least to see them use the threat of going after probationary employees' training contracts as leverage against the pilot group. I do not know the language that the company is using in the most recent version of the training contract, and as others have said, it is highly unlikely that the contract could be enforced if you are involuntarily separated. However, I don't think it's illegal for the company to threaten to enforce the training contract, and RAH could use this sort of threat to try and keep a few airplanes in the air.

As for 9/11 and the subsequent dismissal of 125 pilots out of seniority, the company did not attempt to enforce the training contracts. It is relevant to note, however, that the elimination of Saab flying was planned long before 9/11 ever happened, and therefore the firings that took place were part of a calculated effort to grow the company and not necessary to save Chautauqua, as Bedford continues to claim. These are the sort of tactics the company have used and will use in order to advance its interests.

As others (including, yes, Bolo) have rightly said, stay clear of here until the dust settles.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Regional
89
09-15-2013 07:22 PM
CRJAV8OR
Major
36
03-27-2012 11:06 AM
skippy
GoJet
14
05-14-2009 11:12 AM
skippy
GoJet
4
05-11-2009 08:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices