Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Privilege and Pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2006 | 05:11 PM
  #51  
shackone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LAfrequentflyer
Thats a loaded question...
For you and I, perhaps so.

But not for SH.

He has consistently advocated that continuing to pursue the golden ring cannot pay off for the typical pilot...and at his age, he more than fits into that category. His point is that it would be foolhardy to make this move...that the financial rewards will mature more slowly than his actual age...and that as a result, he'll always be behind the money curve.

That has been his argument from day one...and now he seemingly has done an about-face!

Indeed...maybe he can explain this.
Reply
Old 11-05-2006 | 06:53 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Default

No, he hasn't done an about-face. He's been saying all along how he'd happily take an offer from Alaska, despite all the negative aspects of the career he so thoroughly proliferates these boards with. It's pure irrationality, and I'm sure he'd admit to it, as well as explain that irrationality is precisely the trait needed to pursue the brass ring in the airlines.
Reply
Old 11-05-2006 | 07:31 PM
  #53  
SkyHigh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Self Employed.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,120
Likes: 0
From: Corporate Pilot
Default National Level

Originally Posted by bluebravo
considering the rate of hire at swa and so on yes 400 IS alot
It is a lot for Alaska Air but when compared to the 28,000 or so unemployed or underemployed pilots that are out there at any given time it isn't all that much. In order to see some real movement at the majors they all need to be hiring so that nationwide there is perhaps 5-7000 pilots hired.

Let's not forget that Alaska Air plans to hire that number over the next four years and this is after 4 years of near nil hiring. When you average all that out over the years it really dosen't amount to much.

Skyhigh
Reply
Old 11-05-2006 | 07:40 PM
  #54  
SkyHigh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Self Employed.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,120
Likes: 0
From: Corporate Pilot
Default Plus

Originally Posted by Uncle Bose
No, he hasn't done an about-face. He's been saying all along how he'd happily take an offer from Alaska, despite all the negative aspects of the career he so thoroughly proliferates these boards with. It's pure irrationality, and I'm sure he'd admit to it, as well as explain that irrationality is precisely the trait needed to pursue the brass ring in the airlines.
Let's not forget that I have already paid for my ticket. If the opportunity came up I would be a fool not to take it if offered at face value. It's not like I would run out and start from scratch as a brand new CFI. My perspectives haven't changed it still isn't worth all that.

At this point in my life I would do it just for the sake of achieving a life goal. The first thing I would do after clearing IOE is to run down to get my portrait taken in uniform. Hang that corny baby on the wall next to the obligatory print of an Alaska Airlines jet in flight. The odds of my sticking around after that for very long would be in question. I mean I am not crazy. I can make more on one house than I could for the entire year as an FO, but dreams are dreams.

SkyHigh
Reply
Old 11-05-2006 | 07:42 PM
  #55  
LAfrequentflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by shackone
For you and I, perhaps so.

But not for SH.

He has consistently advocated that continuing to pursue the golden ring cannot pay off for the typical pilot...and at his age, he more than fits into that category. His point is that it would be foolhardy to make this move...that the financial rewards will mature more slowly than his actual age...and that as a result, he'll always be behind the money curve.

That has been his argument from day one...and now he seemingly has done an about-face!

Indeed...maybe he can explain this.
Are you trying to discredit him or genuinely interested in his answer? I can't tell since I don't really know you. My feeling is you and many others would like to have something to use / hold over Skyhigh (a personl attack against one of you, a off-colour remark, etc...) as a means to discredit him.

If he's done one thing its answer all with a sincerely and without mud-slinging. I hope he continues to do so in the future.


-LAFF
Reply
Old 11-05-2006 | 09:22 PM
  #56  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default Luck and timing

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
de727ups put into words perfectly.

"That there is a significant chance that, no matter what you do, you might not make it to the top of the career. It's like a pyramid, the closer to the top you shoot for, the less likely you'll make it. If you'd be happy in the middle, then the more likely you'll make it. Not everyone who simply "wants it", is gonna get there. There is a certain amount of luck and timing involved that you can't control."

I agree. 35-40 years ago, the military was vigorously recruiting pilot candidates due to Vietnam -- the AF alone had ten UPT bases running at capacity. But there were plenty of applicants because of the draft lottery and the fact that (at that time) major airlines hired almost no civilians. Around 1/3 washed out of UPT. Airline jobs were plentiful in the late 70's, but if you ended up at the wrong company, you didn't get to KEEP the job very long. Deregulation probably killed as many pilot careers as it launched. I was a S/O for 7 years, and considered myself lucky. The list of vanished airlines is quite long.

Dickens wrote "It was the best of times; it was the worst of times." Pick any era, and that quote probably applies. I agree with you that some of the unfortunate trends in the airline profession today seem to be permanent, but I also remember that we thought the same thing many times before. I expected to "see the big picture" when I retired. Nope.
Reply
Old 11-06-2006 | 04:36 AM
  #57  
shackone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LAfrequentflyer
Are you trying to discredit him or genuinely interested in his answer?
No...I'm only saying that he has contradicted everything he has so profusely written on the subject of chasing the dream.
Reply
Old 11-06-2006 | 04:52 AM
  #58  
SkyHigh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Self Employed.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,120
Likes: 0
From: Corporate Pilot
Default Shackone

Originally Posted by shackone
No...I'm only saying that he has contradicted everything he has so profusely written on the subject of chasing the dream.
Dear Shackone,

Go and search what I have written. I have always maintained that I would take an opportunity at Alaska Airlines if given today, but I would not waste another day to start over in this profession. If UPS decided to offer me a job I would at least consider sitting through ground school and if nothing else the sim time would serve as a BFR.

I am addicted to flying like everyone else but I wouldn't sacrifice anything more to be there and most likely would not stay longer than it took to satisfy that old dream.


SkyHigh
Reply
Old 11-06-2006 | 04:58 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: G2 gear slammer
Default

Now see you lost me here SH. If you would jump at a chance at Alaska, why wouldnt you eagerly take UPS?

EDIT- I need to add something else here...


Everyone starts out on the lower list sometime in their life. Just because your getting a little older, and maybe having some mid life crisis, doesn't mean you should not be thrown on the bottom of the senority list and pay more dues. I understand you think you paid enough, but sometimes it just isn't.

Last edited by bluebravo; 11-06-2006 at 05:28 AM.
Reply
Old 11-06-2006 | 05:39 AM
  #60  
shackone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
I have always maintained that I would take an opportunity at Alaska Airlines if given today, but I would not waste another day to start over in this profession.
Why would being hired at Alaska not be 'starting over'? How would that be different than starting out at UPS?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av8r4aa
Major
105
09-26-2006 10:44 PM
Michieru
Flight Schools and Training
10
08-15-2006 09:59 PM
daytonaflyer
Cargo
1
06-09-2006 11:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices