Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Is Pinnacle the next ComAir? >

Is Pinnacle the next ComAir?


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Is Pinnacle the next ComAir?

Old 09-06-2012 | 05:04 AM
  #91  
evilboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: "if it's got wings, I can crash it".
Default

Originally Posted by anthony210
Are you guys kidding me? Without ALPA this company would have whipsawed us against each other. Without ALPA Pinnacle would have used Colgan to force you guys at Pinnacle to take concessions or they would transfer planes to Colgan. None of the three groups had a scope clause in their pre merger contract to stop this.

Without ALPA we would not have this decent JCBA we are working under today, its not perfect but its a LOT better than what Colgan was working under before. And its quite a bit better than what Pinnacle had before (barring health benefits).

What do you think would have happened had we not been 1 pilot group right now? I dont think it would have been pretty.

Everyone likes to ***** at ALPA because things are not always perfect. Let me tell you, Teamsters is terrible and in house unions tend to suck. Take a look at USAPA over at US Airways. I would rather have 1 union representing all airline pilots than a bunch of small ones.

Let me play devil's advocate for a moment. I think their point might be that ALPA cares mostly for the senior guys. It is a sentiment shared by many, including me. Are they great?, no. Are they better than all other alternatives?, yes. I do agree with you in having one union represent ALL pilot groups, but it's never going to happen.
Reply
Old 09-06-2012 | 05:09 AM
  #92  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Default

Originally Posted by evilboy
Let me play devil's advocate for a moment. I think their point might be that ALPA cares mostly for the senior guys. It is a sentiment shared by many, including me. Are they great?, no. Are they better than all other alternatives?, yes. I do agree with you in having one union represent ALL pilot groups, but it's never going to happen.
You can't effectively have one union represent all pilot groups. You could have one union represent the regional pilot group and another represent the majors, but it is a conflict of interest for one union to represent a major AND the associated regional partner of said major.
Reply
Old 09-06-2012 | 07:53 AM
  #93  
DeltaPaySoon's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Stage Left
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
You can't effectively have one union represent all pilot groups. You could have one union represent the regional pilot group and another represent the majors, but it is a conflict of interest for one union to represent a major AND the associated regional partner of said major.
You could, in theory, but it will never be allowed to happen. If you think the revolving doors of regional airline's is fast now, just wait to see how fast they create "alternative solutions" with another union representing the regional carriers.

It's legal and logical, in theory....but unattainable.
Reply
Old 09-08-2012 | 01:09 PM
  #94  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
So, when is that going to be 100% sans military pilots?
I'd love to see something like that, with a board of DALPA pilots who could vote to allow exceptions (such as foreign airline or corporate pilots), but the angst over the 35% (Flowthroughs included!) was loud. I still advocate for a higher percentage of ALPA pilots, we will see if that can happen.

On top of that, I'd like to see the UCAL/DAL/ALK/FDX scope sections changed to only allow airlines with ALPA represented pilots be allowed to operate any permitted outsourced aircraft on behalf of that airline.

Unity is leverage.
Reply
Old 09-08-2012 | 03:44 PM
  #95  
Ernst Kessler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Slingin' Gear & Drinkin' Beer
Default

It is puzzling to me to see how blindsided so many on this forum are. After all that ALPA has f'ed up, so many still WANT to be part of ALPA! That is rediculous in my view.

Do you all not realize that the reason Pinnacle is going to shrink is because Delta's ALPA agreed to a contract predicated on the fact that Pinnacle will SHRINK! They signed a deal that half of the CRJ-200's system wide will be parked in the desert, and only a handful of 900's will be awarded to the LOWEST bidder.

Yet!....So many still say that they want ALPA.

In our legal system, an attorney cannot legally defend the plaintiff AND the defendant. Each side of the isle needs their own representation. Likewise, a regional needs to be represented to best suit their own needs, and a major needs to be represented to best suit their own needs as well.

Pinnacle and each regionally out there could far much farther if they banded together and formed a multi-regional union.
Reply
Old 09-08-2012 | 03:47 PM
  #96  
Ernst Kessler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Slingin' Gear & Drinkin' Beer
Default

Oh, and before you flame me down, keep this in mind. The total number of CRJ-200's that Delta wants to cut is the exact amount that Pinnacle has. Is this a coincidence? I personally doubt it.

If only half of Pinnacle's CRJ's get parked, then HALF of the Captains will be First Officers again, and ALL of the First Officers will be standing in the unemployment line.

ALL, because of an agreement with the Delta Pilots for their new contract.


Sooo, just keep in mind that the exact amount of regional jets that will be parked as a result of the Delta's ALPA will be the size of Pinnacle. Just imagine each and every Pinnacle Pilot becoming unemployed.........yea, ALPA is NOT looking out for the regional guys. NOPE!
Reply
Old 09-08-2012 | 03:57 PM
  #97  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: CRJ CA
Default

Latest rumor from the schoolhouse is that 9E will lose all of its CRJ-200s.
Reply
Old 09-08-2012 | 04:05 PM
  #98  
Ernst Kessler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Slingin' Gear & Drinkin' Beer
Default

If that's the case, then how many pilots would be left after the dust settles?
Reply
Old 09-08-2012 | 04:19 PM
  #99  
Saabs's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
From: Airbus button pusher
Default

Originally Posted by Ernst Kessler
Oh, and before you flame me down, keep this in mind. The total number of CRJ-200's that Delta wants to cut is the exact amount that Pinnacle has. Is this a coincidence? I personally doubt it.

If only half of Pinnacle's CRJ's get parked, then HALF of the Captains will be First Officers again, and ALL of the First Officers will be standing in the unemployment line.

ALL, because of an agreement with the Delta Pilots for their new contract.


Sooo, just keep in mind that the exact amount of regional jets that will be parked as a result of the Delta's ALPA will be the size of Pinnacle. Just imagine each and every Pinnacle Pilot becoming unemployed.........yea, ALPA is NOT looking out for the regional guys. NOPE!
Did u even read deltas TA? The amount of crj 200s they want to cut is the amount that pinnacle has? Had trouble in 2nd grade math did we?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Reply
Old 09-08-2012 | 04:41 PM
  #100  
Ernst Kessler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Slingin' Gear & Drinkin' Beer
Default

Originally Posted by Saabs
Did u even read deltas TA? The amount of crj 200s they want to cut is the amount that pinnacle has? Had trouble in 2nd grade math did we?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Why Yes, as a matter of fact, I passed 2nd grade math. However, you must have failed 2nd grade english. It is written in this article below, highlighted to help your reading comprehension skills.

http://www.bizjournals.com/memphis/n...new-labor.html

Delta pilots vote to OK new labor contract

Delta Air Lines Inc. pilots ratified a new contract, the Air Line Pilots Association reported Friday.
ALPA said 94 percent of 10,170 eligible Delta pilots cast a ballot. Of those, 62 percent voted to approve the new agreement, which begins July 1 and runs through Dec. 31, 2015.
An Aviation Week report published earlier this week said the new contract could save Delta $473 million in engine maintenance, Bombardier CRJ200 ownership and Delta Connection contract costs. The proposed new pilot contract includes terms that would enable Atlanta-based Delta (NYSE: DAL) to drop almost 200, 50-seat aircraft from its network by the end of 2015
Last week, Pinnacle Airlines Corp. announced that it was halting labor negotiations while it reformulated its business plan in reaction to the new Delta pilot contract. After it emerges from bankruptcy protection, 140 of Pinnacle’s 181 aircraft will be 50-seat CRJ-200s, the exact planes Delta's new pilot agreement will phase out.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
norskman2
Regional
204
03-04-2014 01:11 PM
SWAjet
Regional
23
01-14-2010 07:19 AM
TristarJS30
Regional
16
05-24-2007 06:02 PM
PistolP
Regional
21
12-29-2006 08:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices