![]() |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1333018)
If that was the point you were trying to make, then why did you post this?You might have a good point in there, but your point tends to get buried in your invective.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1332893)
I did answer your question. Posted the text of the agreement in the other thread.
|
Originally Posted by Reroute
(Post 1333022)
So that agreement shows up where in the CBA? Is it in Section 1 a? 1.b? 1.c? Where exactly? Is it a part of the CBA or is it a separate agreement?
|
Originally Posted by dashdriver22
(Post 1332546)
T.W. during a road show told me to my face about the "vault" letter. Apparently signed from the director of flight ops from Delta. He said it couldn't be published because of the uproar it may cause.
Convenient he now qualifies for a job at DL after passing up the flow a few years ago. |
Originally Posted by paxhauler85
(Post 1333024)
Funny, I don't think Tom has a degree, like so many of his pilots.
Convenient he now qualifies for a job at DL after passing up the flow a few years ago. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1333023)
It is a Separate Agreement. I think there is a link to the original document in our ALPA forum too.
|
Originally Posted by Reroute
(Post 1333029)
IOW, what you are telling me is that it's not in Section 1 of the Pinnacle CBA.
Like some of the Delta JV language. It is scope. It is not in Section 1. |
Originally Posted by dashdriver22
(Post 1332546)
T.W. during a road show told me to my face about the "vault" letter. Apparently signed from the director of flight ops from Delta. He said it couldn't be published because of the uproar it may cause.
|
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1333016)
Bar, the paycuts were coming regardless or they were shutting the doors. There backs were pretty much up against the wall. It was a crap sandwich and they took the best they could do. For you to suggest that they sold out in order to get growth or a bridge is complete nonsense on your part. Thats the only point I was trying to make.
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 1333043)
Does that not sound weird to you? Is one really to believe that the company's financial viability and ability to operate is solely dependant on pilot labor concessions, otherwise shutdown? Somethin is seriously screwy with that picture, and it isn't pilot pay. And a 7 year agreement? Assuming 9E makes it and does well in the future, how much you want to bet that management will line up their pockets with pay increases and bonuses, while pilots continue to serve all 7 years under this agrement. I refuse to believe that a company's business model can depend solely on "making it" through pilot wage cuts.
Without that gift of a flowup to Delta it would eventually have to give raises, but they're likely betting newhires will suck up the pay for a chance at Delta years down the road. The regional model lives on. |
Originally Posted by labbats
(Post 1333051)
I don't see how Pinnacle will get anyone to work there after concessions when American Eagle can't get anyone in the door with a $5000 signing bonus.
Without that gift of a flowup to Delta it would eventually have to give raises, but they're likely betting newhires will suck up the pay for a chance at Delta years down the road. The regional model lives on. |
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1333000)
I figured you would dodge my point. 9E didn't take paycuts in order to get growth or a bridge. Thats the bottom line and you make it sound otherwise. Good day. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by JungleBus
(Post 1332948)
Do you want the new normal to be that new aircraft will be predicated on pay cuts? Because that's the new normal in the regional sector right now.
Refer to Comair Concessions / DCI Fleet Reshuffling in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2010, and 2012. |
Originally Posted by tim123
(Post 1333085)
Wasn't the additional 40 900's that are now committed to Pinnacle based on the paycuts getting passed?
The 40 additional 900s were a given if/when Pinnacle survives as a Delta W/O subsidiary. Semantics, and I'm probably wrong. :cool: |
Can I just say something? As ALPA pilots we choose to outsource 50% percent of our flying, then get mad if some on the "other side" doesn't have a degree?
"It's ok if they are over there, not over here" High horses caused this mess. |
Originally Posted by nwa757
(Post 1333093)
Can I just say something? As ALPA pilots we choose to outsource 50% percent of our flying, then get mad if some on the "other side" doesn't have a degree?
"It's ok if they are over there, not over here" High horses caused this mess. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1332945)
It has little to do with stick and rudder skills. It's more about motivation, dedication, leadership, & desire to succeed. Those that are driven to get the degree show more motivation then those who don't. They show that they possess the ability to learn, listen, & follow instructions. They can excel in areas outside of the flight deck.
As to your jabs at those individuals involved in unfortunate situations, you may want to tread lightly. Karma can be a mean beast. Try to show a little class. |
Slightly off topic and geared to no one on this thread in particular, but judging by the use of English and grammar on APC as a whole, one may be tempted to believe that the vast majority of airline pilots lack any type of college degree.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1333057)
60+% of the their list won't be around regardless by late 2015. There won't be any hiring at 9E for a long time.
While I was not satisfied with the contract put in front of me and voted accordingly, this game is far from over. We were told a substantial amount of our list would be gone when the Saabs left as well, it didn't happen. All we can do is speculate about the future, we can't change what has happened. |
Originally Posted by Stratosphere
(Post 1333108)
True but you guys picked up a few NWA guys without degrees too. I worked with one. Great pilot very good mechanic before he got a pilot slot. Was a DC-9 capt before 9/11. I believe he is back in a capt seat now. But generally I agree with you. I guess in the case of the guy I know he brings things to the table that other pilots lack so in that he does not have a degree he does have a knowledge of airplanes and systems having been a line A@P for years that maybe makes up for it.
|
Originally Posted by legend
(Post 1332556)
Imapilot,
I understand what your saying about those that get a break when you didnt thats fair. However to compare us to the Gulfstream image is not. There was a small percentage that was hired maybe 10% not sure exactly but certainly not the majority. That being said, everyone I have flown with from Gulfstream was a good pilot. You see there you go generalizing again! Although I made no reference to what makes a good pilot. I don't hire pilots Delta does but.....my opinion, which is mostly all this board is, is that without the degree=no interview. Like others have said, change it for ALL OR NONE. My idea would be to keep it. There must be a way to whittle 10000 applications down to a few thousand to interview. This piece of criteria does a good job at narrowing the field to those willing to go the extra mile. Just like the atp type test questions at the interview. Are you really going to need to know what type aspect ratio a certain type of plane has? No but they know people that research the interview are aware of those types of questions. Those that take extra time to study a huge bank of questions score higher amongst the others. Same difference just to a greater degree. They check everyone's background and training but to get to know a person you want to hire for decades in just a few hours what else do you have to go on? |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1333125)
Those are primarily Republic guys hired in 85/early 86 and there is only a tiny handful that don't have it. Excellent pilots and even better story tellers. Republic didn't require it at the time... those were the qualifications.
|
Originally Posted by Imapilot2
(Post 1333127)
I can see where you would get that after rereading, let me be more clear, I am comparing gulfstream to gulfstream. Sorry, no intent to group everyone in one bucket.
Although I made no reference to what makes a good pilot. I don't hire pilots Delta does but.....my opinion, which is mostly all this board is, is that without the degree=no interview. Like others have said, change it for ALL OR NONE. My idea would be to keep it. There must be a way to whittle 10000 applications down to a few thousand to interview. This piece of criteria does a good job at narrowing the field to those willing to go the extra mile. Just like the atp type test questions at the interview. Are you really going to need to know what type aspect ratio a certain type of plane has? No but they know people that research the interview are aware of those types of questions. Those that take extra time to study a huge bank of questions score higher amongst the others. Same difference just to a greater degree. They check everyone's background and training but to get to know a person you want to hire for decades in just a few hours what else do you have to go on? The younger ones could adapt better, but then you could run into the maturity issues that were accentuated in the 3701 accident. |
Originally Posted by Stratosphere
(Post 1333129)
You are correct for the most part but not in his case..He was hired mid 1990's NW had for a very brief period an internal hiring process they (NWA) was primarily trying to get some people from NATCO in but they finally canned that program after an F/A got a pilot slot and could not pass training (or that is the rumor) and they kept running her through it and finally put a female check airman with her and finally washed her out and that was the end of the internal program. Of course mechanics were not popular in the pilot hiring either regardless of experience. But his dad was a senior Capt and I am sure that helped.
|
Originally Posted by putzin
(Post 1332790)
So, since some do not have the piece of paper in hand, you automatically assume that they have not furthered themselves?
Extremely ignorant. |
Originally Posted by Imapilot2
(Post 1333144)
Not nearly as ignorant as extremely oversimplifying a Bachelor's degree to "the piece of paper in hand"
|
Originally Posted by putzin
(Post 1332810)
Sounds like the second guy spent less money and made it to the big show, while you spent more and are still riding around in an RJ.
Your comparison is apples and oranges. Your simply flying an airplane, not solving the worlds problems. It a piece of paper that cost us much but does nothing except help us join the club. It speaks nothing of the character or the professionalism of the individual without one, but speaks volumes about those whining like a 5 year old with one. You reek of entitlement. YGBFKM, the guy who spent years busting his *** in college is the one "reeking of entitlement"? over the other "lower the standards so I can get in guy"? "simply flying an airplane"...well there is one hell of a way to look at a multimillion dollar piece of equipment you don't own with hundreds of families behind you. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1332527)
What the hell is a "vault letter" ? Why is it named that?
I publish my sources. Someone publish this letter, or else I say it does not exist. |
Originally Posted by hitimefurl
(Post 1333179)
80kts is by far the most prolific poster of this "vault letter" existing. Doug over at JetCareers says he can get a copy. One of these two is going to have some 'splainin to do unless there really is a secret letter in the Senior VP of Flight Ops office that no one can see. I heard he calls it the Voldemort Letter.
He didn't write "he could get a copy". He wrote, "if he could get a copy..." |
Originally Posted by nwa757
(Post 1333093)
Can I just say something? As ALPA pilots we choose to outsource 50% percent of our flying, then get mad if some on the "other side" doesn't have a degree?
"It's ok if they are over there, not over here" High horses caused this mess. |
Originally Posted by paxhauler85
(Post 1333024)
Funny, I don't think Tom has a degree, like so many of his pilots.
Convenient he now qualifies for a job at DL after passing up the flow a few years ago. |
Originally Posted by DMEarc
(Post 1333334)
Oh yes he does. Tom is very well educated.
|
Does that make you a better pilot? No it doesn't. Does it make you less professional if you don't? No . Does it make you less safe? Ah NO.
Get used to it. Eventually it won't be a requirement anywhere. If you want to live in a dream world and think your a better pilot because of your piece of paper then have at it. |
Originally Posted by legend
(Post 1333372)
Does that make you a better pilot? No it doesn't. Does it make you less professional if you don't? No . Does it make you less safe? Ah NO.
Get used to it. Eventually it won't be a requirement anywhere. If you want to live in a dream world and think your a better pilot because of your piece of paper then have at it. |
Legend,
You are very passionate about not having a "degree." It is a competitive world. No degree is required to practice law in many states, any huckster can get a license to act as an investment advisor. For some reason a lawyer from Harvard can start at $500,000 a year while a lawyer from Georgia State (which has a higher bar passage rate) starts at less than a fifth of that amount. While book learning does play a role, stick and rudder skills are mostly experience and God given ability. Since objectively we are trained to the same standard, it is impossible to differentiate. But we can measure what are considered "competitive mins." Delta's competitive mins have always been a college degree. It appears some have tried to game the system using pay cuts to get moved to the front of the line. Whether it be Lance Armstrong or pilot who trades pay cuts for special hiring rights, our society reacts with outrage when they perceive an unfair advantage was taken to push to the front of the line. How would you feel if the next express carrier negotiates an agreement which states "for pay 1% below Pinnacle, our pilots will be hired before Pinnacle preferential interviewees." Your agreement has begun a new "market." The sale of preferential hiring opportunities. Some see that as a variation on paying for a job. I don't blame your pilots individually. But I do blame our union collectively for getting into this aspect of outsourcing. It has always been my opinion (as well as that of the Founders of our union) that we should only allow Delta pilots perform Delta flying. Applying that to our circumstance:
UNITY should be the moral cornerstone of our association. Instead the Pinnacle agreement offers a false substitute for unity in exchange for pay cuts. That's abhorrent. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1333394)
Legend,
You are very passionate about not having a "degree." It is a competitive world. No degree is required to practice law in many states, any huckster can get a license to act as an investment advisor. For some reason a lawyer from Harvard can start at $500,000 a year while a lawyer from Georgia State (which has a higher bar passage rate) starts at less than a fifth of that amount. While book learning does play a role, stick and rudder skills are mostly experience and God given ability. Since objectively we are trained to the same standard, it is impossible to differentiate. But we can measure what are considered "competitive mins." Delta's competitive mins have always been a college degree. It appears some have tried to game the system using pay cuts to get moved to the front of the line. Whether it be Lance Armstrong or pilot who trades pay cuts for special hiring rights, our society reacts with outrage when they perceive an unfair advantage was taken to push to the front of the line. How would you feel if the next express carrier negotiates an agreement which states "for pay 1% below Pinnacle, our pilots will be hired before Pinnacle preferential interviewees." Your agreement has begun a new "market." The sale of preferential hiring opportunities. Some see that as a variation on paying for a job. I don't blame your pilots individually. But I do blame our union collectively for getting into this aspect of outsourcing. It has always been my opinion (as well as that of the Founders of our union) that we should only allow Delta pilots perform Delta flying. Applying that to our circumstance:
UNITY should be the moral cornerstone of our association. Instead the Pinnacle agreement offers a false substitute for unity in exchange for pay cuts. That's abhorrent. |
Originally Posted by legend
(Post 1333372)
Does that make you a better pilot? No it doesn't. Does it make you less professional if you don't? No . Does it make you less safe? Ah NO.
Get used to it. Eventually it won't be a requirement anywhere. If you want to live in a dream world and think your a better pilot because of your piece of paper then have at it. |
. .
|
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 1333437)
Cue the Michael Dell, bill Gates, Mark Zuckerburg examples.
|
Originally Posted by legend
(Post 1333372)
Does that make you a better pilot? No it doesn't. Does it make you less professional if you don't? No . Does it make you less safe? Ah NO.
Get used to it. Eventually it won't be a requirement anywhere. If you want to live in a dream world and think your a better pilot because of your piece of paper then have at it. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands