Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Dear United Mainline,

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2013 | 09:00 PM
  #71  
BHopper88's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

There is always this little note at the bottom of the memo.

** Service Charges vary by distance and class of service used and are in
addition to the Base Segment Charge.

So would a coast to coast commute cost more that a shorter commute segment? Think of all the fun we have had getting refunds from united now, let the fun begin with this idea.
Reply
Old 04-08-2013 | 09:10 PM
  #72  
Salukipilot4590's Avatar
Scary...Scary...
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 11
From: Rollin' Down tha 405
Default

This, among other reasons, is why I stopped commuting on United.
Reply
Old 04-08-2013 | 09:28 PM
  #73  
What’s it doing now?
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: 190CA
Default

What was the seven million dollar shortfall? This is space available travel. They weren't losing revenue. Did some dork figure it costs 20 bucks in fuel to move me or my family?
Reply
Old 04-08-2013 | 09:39 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped
Best thing you could ever do for me is deny me the jumpseat to get to work. I've got my commuter policy firmly in hand, so I'll just enjoy my days off. I can't drop a trip to save my life, so you will just be doing it for me!

That being said, I still don't understand the thought process of the regional pilot these days. I've been there, done that, and I would NEVER have thought of commuting to work for a regional. I simply didn't make enough money or have enough time off to make it possible. I moved 3 times with 2 regionals to make sure that I lived in base. The problem with working for a company that doesn't actually pay for seats, fuel, etc. that they fly is that you are at the mercy of the company that pays the bills. Everyone flying for a regional today knew it when they signed up. I certainly did when I was slogging around at the commuters making my $17k a year.

I'm still trying to figure out how you've decided that this is somehow the United PILOTS who are to be held responsible for the travel arrangements with their commuter partners. This is about the 4th time I've been treated to a "denial of jumpseat" threat (and sometimes actually denied the seat) by certain United Express pilots. Sorry, but this does nothing to make me feel threatened. As I mentioned above, not making it to work when I have a commuter policy in the contract is a blessing for me. Keep this in mind, however, when you are appealing for sympathy or action from the United pilot group. In the last decade my airline has shrunk literally in half. Most of my F/O's have been furloughed... many of them twice. During that time, the regionals have literally EXPLODED, flying larger and larger jets, getting hired with less time and less experience. It wasn't that long ago that you had to have several thousand hours of flying checks around before you could even THINK about applying to be a regional F/O for that $20k a year job. Some perspective has been lost over the last 10 years. Yet during all this time of watching more and more express pilots get hired with less and less time, flying more and more of my old routes, I never ONCE denied a UAX pilot the jumpseat. Never ONCE did I do anything other than offer to stow UAX pilots bags in the cockpit and welcome them on board.

It STINKS getting this charge thrown on our UAX pass travelers. I would list how many things Jeff and Glenn have done to mainline employees that STINK, but I don't have enough GB left in my data plan this month to list them all. It's a fight each and every day to push back against the crap that these guys steal from us. Would you like me to cost my pension for you for example??

Feel free to go crazy with fuel burn, denying UAL pilots the jumpseat, flying with the APU on, writing up questionable maint items, etc. etc. The beancounters at UAL are watching. And when they go to your management and say "well, your costs went up 25%. We are going to have to extract that from your contract", where do you think they will take that money from?
I don't know if you have compared the cost of living in places like ORD, EWR, IAD, DEN, and SFO with other places around the country. But if you do that it doesn't take a Harvard MBA to figure out why people would commute over living in base. My house payment will get me a decent one bedroom apartment in most of these places. Not to mention the constant opening and closing of bases. It just isn't affordable. I'd love to live in base if I was paid enough to live there, but I don't see that happening anytime soon. This will just add to the cost of this profession, and cause more people to decide to move to other professions for economical reasons, particularly FAs. Maybe when your A320 is flying around half empty because of a decrease in regional feed due to a lack of crews, you'll start to understand. If you think I'm kidding, go look around at flight schools around the country. This profession is rapidly becoming economically unsustainable for the average person and is probably already there. As much as I love this business, if I were starting right now there is no way I would do it because of the numbers. To quote Smisek's memo when you add up a huge student loan payment, a crashpad, and now as much as $320 a month in fees to commute to work it creates a gap, and there is not a reasonable model for recapture. When I was an FA, a policy like this likely would have driven me out of the business, it was that close of a break even operation for me financially. We are about to enter a very interesting time in this business where actions like this are driving potential employees away, and airlines will have to start competing for employees, rather than relying on having 10 or 15 applicants for every job. This will begin with the regionals at first, but will eventually work its way up to the mainlines as well.
Reply
Old 04-08-2013 | 09:50 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Default

Originally Posted by Tom a Hawk
What was the seven million dollar shortfall? This is space available travel. They weren't losing revenue. Did some dork figure it costs 20 bucks in fuel to move me or my family?

What's really funny is the pass priviliges have been used in the past to justify low wages at airlines........
Reply
Old 04-09-2013 | 03:13 AM
  #76  
MyMamma's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: sitting down facing forward
Default

Delta Airlines would call this "enhanced travel benefits"
Reply
Old 04-09-2013 | 03:53 AM
  #77  
Saabs's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
From: Airbus button pusher
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
What's really funny is the pass priviliges have been used in the past to justify low wages at airlines........
By who? Travel benefits aren't part of any regional jcba and if they were it wouldn't matter as the company has no control over it. I laugh when pinnacle people think they are gonna get better benefits like comair had since we are now owned by delta. Ain't gonna happen. Jumpseat or bust oh well.

Travel benefits are not part of compensation.

Last edited by Saabs; 04-09-2013 at 04:23 AM.
Reply
Old 04-09-2013 | 04:30 AM
  #78  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 7
From: 737
Default

You gotta remember that the bean counters coming up with these charges are not crew members. They've never commuted. They sit in a cube. They only look at non-rev bennies as free loading employees wanting to go on a mini-vacation to Vegas or Hawaii to sit on the beach. Commuting crew members is the last thing on their mind. They think we're overprivilaged anyways because we can jumpseat and live a glamorous lifestyle flying to Des Moines. Welcome to the suck! (Again)
Reply
Old 04-09-2013 | 05:38 AM
  #79  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Everyone is panicing and making threats. One memo from an unknown source to an unknown recipient has been posted. Let's take a deep breath until we get something official. Then we go to war.

And to the disingenuous majority who think jumpseat/non rev wars don't work, Ask an ASA pilot why we're the only DCI carrier that gets full priority on our own metal. I suspect a lot of DAL pilots complained to their chief pilots about not being able to get to or home from work in late 2007 when DAL last threatened to "enhance" our non rev "benefits".
Reply
Old 04-09-2013 | 05:52 AM
  #80  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Everyone is panicing and making threats. One memo from an unknown source to an unknown recipient has been posted. Let's take a deep breath until we get something official. Then we go to war.

Inside scoop at SKW is that this is for real.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
CAL EWR
United
67
11-25-2012 03:46 PM
Airway
Major
11
09-08-2012 07:58 AM
APC225
United
0
06-03-2012 06:15 AM
Blackbird
Major
17
06-23-2009 09:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices