Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2013, 06:46 AM
  #531  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flysooner9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,723
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
How long have you known them?

.


Been lurking around here for about 8 years.
flysooner9 is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 06:49 AM
  #532  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by flysooner9 View Post
Your exactly right. I voted no on our contract but 70 something percent did. The cycles got to stop somewhere. I will still be shocked if RAH can even staff their AA flying. We as an entire regional group need to call mainlines bluff. They know deep down that we have all the leverage but until someone stands up to them they'll continue pushing the race to the bottom.
I hear ya man. I'm all for standing up and unity and crap. But that ship has sailed. You don't even see it in the major ranks. I just ask, we are not different than any other regional carrier. We are all here to do the same job and move on and provide for our families. Don't bash and swipe a broad brush at a group of pilots. Isn't that the first bluff in this game?
avi8tor220 is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 07:16 AM
  #533  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Default

Originally Posted by avi8tor220 View Post
I hear ya man. I'm all for standing up and unity and crap. But that ship has sailed. You don't even see it in the major ranks. I just ask, we are not different than any other regional carrier. We are all here to do the same job and move on and provide for our families. Don't bash and swipe a broad brush at a group of pilots. Isn't that the first bluff in this game?
Good post, you responded better than I did earlier. Regrettably I let him get under my skin yesterday. It's getting old listening to all the couch quarterbacks on here, especially the junior ones to this game. The railway Labor act and other bankruptcy laws makes it impossible to fight a company through a bankruptcy process. The only option I felt like we had was to act with our feet and leave. Either way it's a win win for Delta.
gojo is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 07:47 AM
  #534  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 841
Default

I'm curious to know what would have made you guys vote no? Given the same scenerio of go belly up or bend over, how far would you guys bend over? Now I understand everyones situation is different and some of you have families and so on, so I can't judge. My lifestyle would personally make a no vote easy, but that's irrelevant. How much are we as a group willing to give up?
pitchtrim is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 07:54 AM
  #535  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

Originally Posted by pitchtrim View Post
I'm curious to know what would have made you guys vote no? Given the same scenerio of go belly up or bend over, how far would you guys bend over? Now I understand everyones situation is different and some of you have families and so on, so I can't judge. My lifestyle would personally make a no vote easy, but that's irrelevant. How much are we as a group willing to give up?
Yep ... it's dead.


Oh, wait a minute, that's a cow.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 09:02 AM
  #536  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 320
Posts: 709
Default

Originally Posted by pitchtrim View Post
I'm curious to know what would have made you guys vote no? Given the same scenerio of go belly up or bend over, how far would you guys bend over? Now I understand everyones situation is different and some of you have families and so on, so I can't judge. My lifestyle would personally make a no vote easy, but that's irrelevant. How much are we as a group willing to give up?
I would probably fly for about 2 bucks a year. I would take capt of a 747 for $35 a year. Would be willing to negotiate that rate as long as I get my picture on the cover of the in flight magazine. (For those who can not detect sarcasm this is it) This topic has been talked about enough in my opinion. No one really knows how far they will really go until they are put in that position to choose.
tom14cat14 is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 10:41 AM
  #537  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

flysooner does have a point. Remember, the threat from Delta was that the entire 9E operation would winddown with one year, and that they have other carriers selected for that flying. There are two things wrong with this. One, you cannot take nearly 200 airplanes out of the DCI system in one year or less. Their threat would be more credible if they gave a longer time specification. But one year is unrealistic, and looking at past history with Comair, a slow dismantling is what would need to happen to remove a huge airplane fleet. And two, where do they think they would get 2,700 pilots in one year to replace these jets at the new company? Maybe 500-700 junior guys will follow the planes, but I have a had time believing RJ Captains will follow the planes to be back on reserve as FO at the new company. Simply put, with the ATP rule going into affect 3 months, there just wouldn't be enough people coming through the pipelines to staff over 180 airplanes in that timeframe. Therefore, it was a bluff. Realistically speaking they could not have done what they were claiming to do in that timeframe.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 10:44 AM
  #538  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BIGRIG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Couch-Horizontal
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
flysooner does have a point. Remember, the threat from Delta was that the entire 9E operation would winddown with one year, and that they have other carriers selected for that flying. There are two things wrong with this. One, you cannot take nearly 200 airplanes out of the DCI system in one year or less. Their threat would be more credible if they gave a longer time specification. But one year is unrealistic, and looking at past history with Comair, a slow dismantling is what would need to happen to remove a huge airplane fleet. And two, where do they think they would get 2,700 pilots in one year to replace these jets at the new company? Maybe 500-700 junior guys will follow the planes, but I have a had time believing RJ Captains will follow the planes to be back on reserve as FO at the new company. Simply put, with the ATP rule going into affect 3 months, there just wouldn't be enough people coming through the pipelines to staff over 180 airplanes in that timeframe. Therefore, it was a bluff. Realistically speaking they could not have done what they were claiming to do in that timeframe.
Oh darn. Where were you during the vote? I could have used your wisdom.
BIGRIG is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 10:46 AM
  #539  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Weren't other DCI carriers hiring at a steady clip until the vote took place and Pinnacle would survive? I thought at that point, the hiring suddenly and simultaneously stopped. It seems to me other places were staffing up to be ready for the fall out.
block30 is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 10:57 AM
  #540  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by block30 View Post
Weren't other DCI carriers hiring at a steady clip until the vote took place and Pinnacle would survive? I thought at that point, the hiring suddenly and simultaneously stopped. It seems to me other places were staffing up to be ready for the fall out.
Do you really think other regionals will attract ATP-rated 1,500+ hr pilots to fly for $23k a year? And even if they do, you think they will get enough of these applicants to fill RJ FO seats?
ShyGuy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Past V1
Regional
30
12-22-2012 04:57 PM
SmitteyB
Regional
31
08-10-2012 05:29 PM
OKLATEX
Cargo
3
04-03-2012 03:07 PM
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices