Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2013 | 06:46 AM
  #531  
flysooner9's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
How long have you known them?

.


Been lurking around here for about 8 years.
Reply
Old 05-08-2013 | 06:49 AM
  #532  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flysooner9
Your exactly right. I voted no on our contract but 70 something percent did. The cycles got to stop somewhere. I will still be shocked if RAH can even staff their AA flying. We as an entire regional group need to call mainlines bluff. They know deep down that we have all the leverage but until someone stands up to them they'll continue pushing the race to the bottom.
I hear ya man. I'm all for standing up and unity and crap. But that ship has sailed. You don't even see it in the major ranks. I just ask, we are not different than any other regional carrier. We are all here to do the same job and move on and provide for our families. Don't bash and swipe a broad brush at a group of pilots. Isn't that the first bluff in this game?
Reply
Old 05-08-2013 | 07:16 AM
  #533  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by avi8tor220
I hear ya man. I'm all for standing up and unity and crap. But that ship has sailed. You don't even see it in the major ranks. I just ask, we are not different than any other regional carrier. We are all here to do the same job and move on and provide for our families. Don't bash and swipe a broad brush at a group of pilots. Isn't that the first bluff in this game?
Good post, you responded better than I did earlier. Regrettably I let him get under my skin yesterday. It's getting old listening to all the couch quarterbacks on here, especially the junior ones to this game. The railway Labor act and other bankruptcy laws makes it impossible to fight a company through a bankruptcy process. The only option I felt like we had was to act with our feet and leave. Either way it's a win win for Delta.
Reply
Old 05-08-2013 | 07:47 AM
  #534  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Default

I'm curious to know what would have made you guys vote no? Given the same scenerio of go belly up or bend over, how far would you guys bend over? Now I understand everyones situation is different and some of you have families and so on, so I can't judge. My lifestyle would personally make a no vote easy, but that's irrelevant. How much are we as a group willing to give up?
Reply
Old 05-08-2013 | 07:54 AM
  #535  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by pitchtrim
I'm curious to know what would have made you guys vote no? Given the same scenerio of go belly up or bend over, how far would you guys bend over? Now I understand everyones situation is different and some of you have families and so on, so I can't judge. My lifestyle would personally make a no vote easy, but that's irrelevant. How much are we as a group willing to give up?
Yep ... it's dead.


Oh, wait a minute, that's a cow.
Reply
Old 05-08-2013 | 09:02 AM
  #536  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: 320
Default

Originally Posted by pitchtrim
I'm curious to know what would have made you guys vote no? Given the same scenerio of go belly up or bend over, how far would you guys bend over? Now I understand everyones situation is different and some of you have families and so on, so I can't judge. My lifestyle would personally make a no vote easy, but that's irrelevant. How much are we as a group willing to give up?
I would probably fly for about 2 bucks a year. I would take capt of a 747 for $35 a year. Would be willing to negotiate that rate as long as I get my picture on the cover of the in flight magazine. (For those who can not detect sarcasm this is it) This topic has been talked about enough in my opinion. No one really knows how far they will really go until they are put in that position to choose.
Reply
Old 05-08-2013 | 10:41 AM
  #537  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,496
Likes: 505
Default

flysooner does have a point. Remember, the threat from Delta was that the entire 9E operation would winddown with one year, and that they have other carriers selected for that flying. There are two things wrong with this. One, you cannot take nearly 200 airplanes out of the DCI system in one year or less. Their threat would be more credible if they gave a longer time specification. But one year is unrealistic, and looking at past history with Comair, a slow dismantling is what would need to happen to remove a huge airplane fleet. And two, where do they think they would get 2,700 pilots in one year to replace these jets at the new company? Maybe 500-700 junior guys will follow the planes, but I have a had time believing RJ Captains will follow the planes to be back on reserve as FO at the new company. Simply put, with the ATP rule going into affect 3 months, there just wouldn't be enough people coming through the pipelines to staff over 180 airplanes in that timeframe. Therefore, it was a bluff. Realistically speaking they could not have done what they were claiming to do in that timeframe.
Reply
Old 05-08-2013 | 10:44 AM
  #538  
BIGRIG's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Couch-Horizontal
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
flysooner does have a point. Remember, the threat from Delta was that the entire 9E operation would winddown with one year, and that they have other carriers selected for that flying. There are two things wrong with this. One, you cannot take nearly 200 airplanes out of the DCI system in one year or less. Their threat would be more credible if they gave a longer time specification. But one year is unrealistic, and looking at past history with Comair, a slow dismantling is what would need to happen to remove a huge airplane fleet. And two, where do they think they would get 2,700 pilots in one year to replace these jets at the new company? Maybe 500-700 junior guys will follow the planes, but I have a had time believing RJ Captains will follow the planes to be back on reserve as FO at the new company. Simply put, with the ATP rule going into affect 3 months, there just wouldn't be enough people coming through the pipelines to staff over 180 airplanes in that timeframe. Therefore, it was a bluff. Realistically speaking they could not have done what they were claiming to do in that timeframe.
Oh darn. Where were you during the vote? I could have used your wisdom.
Reply
Old 05-08-2013 | 10:46 AM
  #539  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Weren't other DCI carriers hiring at a steady clip until the vote took place and Pinnacle would survive? I thought at that point, the hiring suddenly and simultaneously stopped. It seems to me other places were staffing up to be ready for the fall out.
Reply
Old 05-08-2013 | 10:57 AM
  #540  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,496
Likes: 505
Default

Originally Posted by block30
Weren't other DCI carriers hiring at a steady clip until the vote took place and Pinnacle would survive? I thought at that point, the hiring suddenly and simultaneously stopped. It seems to me other places were staffing up to be ready for the fall out.
Do you really think other regionals will attract ATP-rated 1,500+ hr pilots to fly for $23k a year? And even if they do, you think they will get enough of these applicants to fill RJ FO seats?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Past V1
Regional
30
12-22-2012 04:57 PM
SmitteyB
Regional
31
08-10-2012 05:29 PM
OKLATEX
Cargo
3
04-03-2012 03:07 PM
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices