Pinnacle/Mesaba/Colgan ISL question.
04-18-2013 | 07:31 PM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 captain
I have zero skin in the game and all I can say is I think the solution was fair and equitable.
OK. so is there any single individual that read that and said "you changed my mind"?
PM me and I will PayPal you $100 if you agree.
Seriously, you can ask the guy that gets $100 if I actually paid him/her because I will publish the winners user name. . .
but I hope the winner would honestly have changed their mind although I realize it's probably not true.
OK. so is there any single individual that read that and said "you changed my mind"?
PM me and I will PayPal you $100 if you agree.
Seriously, you can ask the guy that gets $100 if I actually paid him/her because I will publish the winners user name. . .
but I hope the winner would honestly have changed their mind although I realize it's probably not true.
04-19-2013 | 10:38 AM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
04-19-2013 | 10:45 AM
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
I'd call that a good presentation by the Colgan Merger Committee.
04-19-2013 | 10:51 AM
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,499
Likes: 505
It is a windfall. Having a one-way fence where Colgan is protected to 193 CA seats on the Q and no XJ/9E can bid those, meanwhile Colgan Q CAs can bid to the RJs and keep reducing their quota number of 193 as they come off the Q400 onto jets. If this cycle continued and the Qs stuck around, you'd have a constant flow where current Q Captains at Colgan bid over to the jets, and they could only be replaced by Colgan FOs because the quota of 193 wouldn't be met.
That's a windfall, pure and simple. A one-way fence for no reason. And it wasn't a good presentation by the Colgan committee, it was the 9E committee that completely f'ed up and Bloch punished the 9E group by keeping them off the Qs AND the Saabs, since 9E pretended like all the Saabs didn't exist. Idiots.
That's a windfall, pure and simple. A one-way fence for no reason. And it wasn't a good presentation by the Colgan committee, it was the 9E committee that completely f'ed up and Bloch punished the 9E group by keeping them off the Qs AND the Saabs, since 9E pretended like all the Saabs didn't exist. Idiots.
04-19-2013 | 10:58 AM
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
It is a windfall. Having a one-way fence where Colgan is protected to 193 CA seats on the Q and no XJ/9E can bid those, meanwhile Colgan Q CAs can bid to the RJs and keep reducing their quota number of 193 as they come off the Q400 onto jets. If this cycle continued and the Qs stuck around, you'd have a constant flow where current Q Captains at Colgan bid over to the jets, and they could only be replaced by Colgan FOs because the quota of 193 wouldn't be met.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
