Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Eagle AIP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2014 | 04:14 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
No worries. With all the retirements kicking in and Delta, United, SW, Spirit, etc. hiring, then there will be a place for you to go even if AA blacklists you.
So there is NO real reason to vote other than NO. everyone will gate a job at mainline due to retirements just as united has done and they are reducing there feed due to lack of staffing at the feeders.
Reply
Old 02-02-2014 | 04:54 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
Originally Posted by SkylineAviation
You think I'm advocating this contract, or think I agree? I'm simply putting out information that came directly from the shot callers.

I think the whole thing stinks but at the same time everyone needs to be well informed. You can not deny that management has fiduciary responsibility. If not they go to jail (i.e. Enron). And yes, they prey on that but it's not only limited to airlines, it's corporate america.

Vote yes, vote no...make a move and stick to it. But at least know the facts in a rational way. Try to think as others around you do and then you can know others motives and next move. It's a great negotiating tactic that management has mastered and we're just trying to play catch-up.


What are you smoking? No management on the planet has ever gone to jail "(i.e. Enron)" for not forcing paycuts down their employees throats! Seriously, fiduciary duty to cut the pay of employees of a hugely profitable company with multiple billions in the bank???

The Enron debacle had NOTHING to do with paycuts for employees...
Because that's what I said. Please learn how to read and comprehend.
Reply
Old 02-02-2014 | 06:49 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

I got crickets last time I asked this:

Would all you pilots telling Eagle to "stand strong" be willing to give longevity for bidding AT YOUR COMPANY to any Eagle pilot furloughed in the case that they vote no and AA comes through on their promise of a wind down?

What about 50% longevity?
Reply
Old 02-02-2014 | 06:52 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
I got crickets last time I asked this:

Would all you pilots telling Eagle to "stand strong" be willing to give longevity for bidding AT YOUR COMPANY to any Eagle pilot furloughed in the case that they vote no and AA comes through on their promise of a wind down?

What about 50% longevity?
I think we know the answer to that.
Reply
Old 02-02-2014 | 06:59 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: The right seat
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
I got crickets last time I asked this:

Would all you pilots telling Eagle to "stand strong" be willing to give longevity for bidding AT YOUR COMPANY to any Eagle pilot furloughed in the case that they vote no and AA comes through on their promise of a wind down?

What about 50% longevity?
Why would I do that? Nobody gave us at XJT that option when 83% of us told mgt what they could do with their crappy Ta they offered us.

And yes we've been threatened too. We've been told over and over from mgt and alpa exactly when the leases on our aircraft are up. CRJ and ERJ. We were also told that they would bid on no more rfp's if the TA was voted down.
Reply
Old 02-02-2014 | 08:04 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by TheBlueBaron
Why would I do that? Nobody gave us at XJT that option when 83% of us told mgt what they could do with their crappy Ta they offered us.

And yes we've been threatened too. We've been told over and over from mgt and alpa exactly when the leases on our aircraft are up. CRJ and ERJ. We were also told that they would bid on no more rfp's if the TA was voted down.
It just goes towards my point that everyone is all harda$$ when its another company but when it affects "you" then its a different story.

Yes, XJT voted no, and that is commendable to say the least. My opinion is that Eagle, PSA, and probably very soon Piedmont are in a worse position due to being wholly owned. The threat of a shutdown is a little more empty when it comes to XJT.

Asking another pilot group to "fall on their sword" without giving them an "out" is just as selfish as voting yes.
Reply
Old 02-02-2014 | 09:24 AM
  #57  
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
Stuck Mic
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
It just goes towards my point that everyone is all harda$$ when its another company but when it affects "you" then its a different story.

Yes, XJT voted no, and that is commendable to say the least. My opinion is that Eagle, PSA, and probably very soon Piedmont are in a worse position due to being wholly owned. The threat of a shutdown is a little more empty when it comes to XJT.

Asking another pilot group to "fall on their sword" without giving them an "out" is just as selfish as voting yes.
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

You need to make decisions for yourself, stand up on your own 2 feet and make your own path. Asking for a safety net like that from another carrier is absurd.

Each carrier is different. You need to decide for yourself what you believe would/could happen depending on how the vote goes. They may have the plan to wind you down in the next x number of years no matter now you vote. So you can stay with your current QOL or take x % cuts and still not know the future. There are numerous possibilities that could happen.
Reply
Old 02-02-2014 | 10:23 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
I got crickets last time I asked this:

Would all you pilots telling Eagle to "stand strong" be willing to give longevity for bidding AT YOUR COMPANY to any Eagle pilot furloughed in the case that they vote no and AA comes through on their promise of a wind down?

What about 50% longevity?
If you've gone to any of the road shows and spoken with any members of the MEC then you would know that the company does not intend to furlough right away. They plan to let the company shrink due to attrition and flow and then eventually shut it down.

I think the regionals will be hurting so bad in a couple years that it won't come to fruition. Just my two cents.
Reply
Old 02-02-2014 | 11:57 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: emb-145 ca
Default

Originally Posted by TheBlueBaron
Why would I do that? Nobody gave us at XJT that option when 83% of us told mgt what they could do with their crappy Ta they offered us.

And yes we've been threatened too. We've been told over and over from mgt and alpa exactly when the leases on our aircraft are up. CRJ and ERJ. We were also told that they would bid on no more rfp's if the TA was voted down.
I thought that was a promise, not a threat. I suppose they (United) will start swinging the axe on more that just CLE then. Ha! Lack of "available" pilots? Put bid out to _______ regional airline. Good luck on _______ regional airline getting new hires to fly them. The churn machine is broken. Maybe a couple close to zero seniority guys bail. Almost no one else is going to become a newhire at _______ regional airline. Rather collect unemployment.

I see United is handing out a lot of RFPs lately... going to be hearing crickets not bids.

Off topic slightly, but basically the same thing going on at our house.

Last edited by CaptainNameless; 02-02-2014 at 12:33 PM.
Reply
Old 02-02-2014 | 01:30 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by TheBlueBaron

We were also told that they would bid on no more rfp's if the TA was voted down.
That's what I'm saying. Why wouldn't they bid on RFPs? To spite the pilots? It's not logical.

It doesn't make very good business sense to just shut down the business.....

A wholly owned is a totally different animal.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
35
03-13-2016 04:38 AM
Pilot7
Hiring News
36
02-15-2014 12:07 PM
Pilot7
Regional
102
07-10-2013 08:45 PM
bernoulli1129
Hiring News
2
03-23-2013 10:18 AM
Lbell911
Regional
18
11-26-2007 11:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices