Originally Posted by Trip7

I agree it's a well written article. I like the 1500 rule for personal reasons because it raises the demand and value of Regional FOs much earlier than expected.

Safety wise is it a logical rule? Absolutely not. It was a knee jerk reaction. There are plenty of University and ATP Flight school grads with less than 1000 hours that have the skills to be competent FOs. It's about the training, not the flight time.

Calling this reporter ignorant is well, ignorant

Originally Posted by minimwage4

That looks like an Ana 787 delivery flight. Japanese pilots wear white gloves when they fly. It's tradition I guess.

Originally Posted by DirkDiggler

The Pilot Shortage Made in Congress | National Review Online

This article made me so mad I just sent her a very nasty email requesting she redact the entire article.

Her email is: [email protected]

We need to squash the ignorance in the news.

Originally Posted by Past V1

Before the new flight-time rules for pilots kicked in, plane travel was already the safest it had been in the entire history of aviation. By the latest airline-industry count, there’s only one major accident for every 5 million flights on Western-built jets. Even in plane crashes, 95.7 percent of passengers survive, as CNN has reported. The New York Times has reported that “in the last five years, the death risk for passengers in the United States has been one in 45 million flights.”

Such bad policy has real consequences, which are already playing out. Last summer in my hometown of Cheyenne, Wyo., the tiny regional airport had to temporarily suspend 30 working pilots because they had not yet met the 1,500-hour requirement. And earlier this month, it announced it was suspending service to six airports because it couldn’t find enough pilots who met the FAA standards.

Those who once would have flown out of Cheyenne will now be forced to commute to Denver International Airport, about two hours’ drive away. Perhaps some of them will forgo air travel altogether and take a road trip. Keep in mind that between January and June 2013, 15,470 people died in motor-vehicle crashes in the United States; in 2012, only 475 people worldwide died in plane crashes (in comparison, the World Health Organization has reported that 1.24 million people across the world died in car crashes last year). Globally, fewer people die from air travel than die by using right-handed equipment when you’re a lefty, especially when it’s a power saw; by being crushed by televisions or furniture; or by getting a brain-eating parasite.

Though well-intentioned, the new rule does more harm than good, creating an additional and altogether unnecessary barrier to entry for much-needed pilots. Such are the perils of legislation by emotional reaction.

— Jillian Kay Melchior writes for National Review as a Thomas L. Rhodes Fellow for the Franklin Center. She is also a senior fellow for the Independent Women’s Forum.

Here you go...

Originally Posted by RV5M

I don't understand what's wrong with this article. Part 117 WAS a knee jerk reaction and not based on anything. It's actually a good article compared to some of the other ill informed aviation writing I've read recently.