Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Actual text of RAH TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/80176-actual-text-rah-ta.html)

Loon 03-04-2014 06:48 PM


Originally Posted by Pilotpip (Post 1594889)
Actually, it did have an expiration. Upon ratification of a new CBA. Don't like it, lead a charge to have the assessment removed.



The committee, is chaired by Dan and Eve. That's why they sign it. While line pilots, this isn't their first rodeo and Eve is far more qualified to be there than the average line pilot because of her previous career. You seem to make the assumption that it's just a couple line pilots sitting there. You're wrong. Various committees were consulted, explained their stances and a number of attorneys and experts from other airlines were consulted as well. Had you and others taken a little more interest in happenings there, you would have had a TA long ago. Nobody wanted to run for the eboard, and this is what you ended up with.

For someone who no longer works there, I seem to have a better pulse on the situation than you do.

Didn't she work for Enron?

John Carr 03-04-2014 06:53 PM


Originally Posted by zoooropa (Post 1595289)
The LBFO from February 2013 had higher pay rates than this TA. How in the world does that happen?

Sorry, don't know what the LBFM, err LBFO is.

But see my prior posting on what may be happening big picture here.

ThrustMonkey 03-04-2014 08:20 PM


Originally Posted by Loon (Post 1595329)
This really makes no sense. What does it matter if I were to break it down in bullet points? I can only cast one vote(and that vote is yes). As far as me "owing" anything to the pilot group: the way I see it is that this pilot group(or at least the idiots who voted for the assessment) owe me the money that I have had to cough up for their stupidity.

It matters in that it would show that you have a complete lack of understanding what voting in that TA means. 95% of that TA is concessionary and is worthless. Severe wiggle room language on the company's part, very weak pay rates for all but the newest of hires, even worse reserve rules, a "bonus" that is less than what they are paying a brand new hire. Nevermind, I'm doing your homework for you and like I stated earlier....you can't fix stupid. Enjoy your yes vote. Fitting handle by the way......

BBedford 03-04-2014 09:33 PM

Everyone, please pray about this. I am confident that once you do, God will tell you to vote yes.

God bless,

Bryan

Boomer 03-05-2014 07:28 AM


Originally Posted by ThrustMonkey (Post 1594659)
I would love....LOVE to see you break down each section of that craptastic TA and explain why you think each bullet point warrants a yes vote. No seriously, I DARE you!

Loon has already admitted that he is voting YES just to stick it to whomever he perceives wronged him. His own words: "cut off my nose to spite my face"

STR8NLVL 03-05-2014 07:55 AM

Never argue with an idiot. He'll bring you down to his level and then beat you with experience.

Only a complete moron would vote for a TA that will make you a RSV ***** every moment you're on duty, guarantee your pay raise each year is at least half of the rate of inflation (not counting the giant healthcare increase you're guaranteed to receive), with worthless rigs, CX by trip instead of by leg, 75% DH pay, and holes in the language so large you can fly your shiny 170 through them.

Loon, your screen name is definitely appropriately chosen...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands