Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
DOT: US Regional Crew Cost Comparison >

DOT: US Regional Crew Cost Comparison


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

DOT: US Regional Crew Cost Comparison

Old 03-05-2014 | 01:42 PM
  #1  
spuzzyair
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default DOT: US Regional Crew Cost Comparison

So Lets compare crew cost as percentage of hourly (non-fuel) operating cost that companies that have reported.

ERJ140/145
Republic - 23.2%
ExpressJet - 43.5%
Eage - 44.1%

CRJ200
PSA - 22.5%
Mesa - 26.1%
AirWis - 27.3%
Skywest - 28.7%
Pinnacle - 33.8%
ExpressJet - 35.1%

CRJ700
PSA - 22.2%
GoJet - 24.9%
Mesa - 27.5%
Skywest - 27.8%
ExpressJet - 36.9%
Eagle - 44.0%

E170
Republic - 24.2%
Compass - 42.2%

CRJ900
Mesa - 29.5%
Skywest - 33.2%
ExpressJet - 35.7%
Pinnacle - 38.6%

=

With the above table one can see who the carriers are that have high labor burdens (Eagle for example), versus those that have lower labor cost burdens (ie PSA) as percentage of their hourly aircraft operating costing.


Source DOT Form 41.
Reply
Old 03-05-2014 | 01:46 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

This chart is worthless.

Based on what airlines have negotiated in their agreements with the majors, they pay different costs. Some have the mainline carrier paying for their airplanes, pilot training, etc, while others do not.

Carriers that don't bear as many other costs are going to have a higher percentage of costs be for the crew.
Reply
Old 03-05-2014 | 01:48 PM
  #3  
What's Avatar
Underpaid...
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: French-Canadian
Default

Originally Posted by spuzzyair
So Lets compare crew cost as percentage of hourly (non-fuel) operating cost that companies that have reported.

ERJ140/145
Republic - 23.2%
ExpressJet - 43.5%
Eage - 44.1%

CRJ200
PSA - 22.5%
Mesa - 26.1%
AirWis - 27.3%
Skywest - 28.7%
Pinnacle - 33.8%
ExpressJet - 35.1%

CRJ700
PSA - 22.2%
GoJet - 24.9%
Mesa - 27.5%
Skywest - 27.8%
ExpressJet - 36.9%
Eagle - 44.0%

E170
Republic - 24.2%
Compass - 42.2%

CRJ900
Mesa - 29.5%
Skywest - 33.2%
ExpressJet - 35.7%
Pinnacle - 38.6%

=

With the above table one can see who the carriers are that have high labor burdens (Eagle for example), versus those that have lower labor cost burdens (ie PSA) as percentage of their hourly aircraft operating costing.


Source DOT Form 41.
Interesting how Eagle is nearly 100% more expensive than RAH. These figures say that Eagle pilots are compensated twice the composition of a RAH crew member. I am sorry, but look who reports these numbers.
Reply
Old 03-05-2014 | 01:54 PM
  #4  
crflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

dumb . . .
Reply
Old 03-05-2014 | 01:57 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=lolwut;1595940]This chart is worthless.

Based on what airlines have negotiated in their agreements with the majors, they pay different costs. Some have the mainline carrier paying for their airplanes, pilot training, etc, while others do not.

Carriers that don't bear as many other costs are going to have a higher percentage of costs be for the crew.[/QUOTE

i would not say that it is worthless but you need a little bit of backround information to fully understand the material. what is fact though is that the companies at the top as far as cost per pilot are seeking concessions and the companies at the bottom are doing nothing or offering contracts that kind of put them more towards the middle. what would be more helpful would be to see the total break down of cost and who is getting what .
Reply
Old 03-05-2014 | 01:57 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Default

So Republic pilots are nearly twice as expensive as Compass pilots for the same aircraft?
Reply
Old 03-05-2014 | 02:14 PM
  #7  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BrewCity
So Republic pilots are nearly twice as expensive as Compass pilots for the same aircraft?
I think u have that backwards according to the chart ( looking at E-170 numbers). But the chart doesn't really give us enough information.
Reply
Old 03-05-2014 | 05:47 PM
  #8  
texaspilot76's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

Payrates are a very small portion of the total operating cost of an airline. You can't judge how expensive it is to run a copany on hourly pay rates alone.
Reply
Old 03-05-2014 | 06:03 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Payrates are a very small portion of the total operating cost of an airline. You can't judge how expensive it is to run a copany on hourly pay rates alone.
This is exactly why this comparison tells us nothing. Crews can make identical amounts and be vastly different percentage of the costs. It all depends on what "costs" the airline has.

Example: Crew costs $200/hr and the airline has costs of $1000/hr =20%
Crew Costs $200/hr and the airline has costs of $2000/hr =10%

The more total costs the company has the lower the percentage the crew cost will make up. So you could have skyhigh costs and have a small percentage of that cost be crew costs.

This guy wasted his time.....and now mine.
Reply
Old 03-05-2014 | 06:07 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Payrates are a very small portion of the total operating cost of an airline. You can't judge how expensive it is to run a copany on hourly pay rates alone.
It depends on the airline. For a large carrier with a marketing department, sales, etc yes that's correct.

For a labor staffing company, which is basically all some "airlines" are, the pay rate would be a significant portion of their operating cost.

Example, according to BTS data I was reviewing several years ago, the operating cost of an XYZ ERJ was significantly less than my companies CRJ. When I looked at the numbers, the XYZ ERJ company paid $0.50/gal for JetA, my company was paying $3. This inflated the overall operating cost of my company, reducing the labor cost. It would have the opposite effect on the XYZ ERJ company.

The majors these days are buying the aircraft and just using the regionals to staff them. The regional airline has no back end to sustain. The operating cost of those airplanes is incredibly low (and labor % incredibly high) because the only thing they are really paying out is labor. Everything else, for all intents and purposes, is a zero cost.

If you look at Republic and Compass, I would bet Republic owns their aircraft where as Compass does not. Anyone know if that is true?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SrfNFly227
SkyWest
136
08-07-2012 06:06 PM
Ellen
Regional
42
11-01-2006 03:53 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM
bhndthecns
Flight Schools and Training
5
08-05-2005 01:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices