|
Originally Posted by bedrock
(Post 1610521)
|
Originally Posted by AllisonRR
(Post 1610557)
No I'm not management or have any desire to be I like to fly and this is why I bother to post. I don't believe the NO is the smart choice.
For the record that article is biased and I only posted it because it looks very similar to what we get from Dallas and New York LEC's. I have always said that the TA has risks and rewards and it is only my opinion that the risks do not outweigh the rewards. I respect the pilots that vote on principle. And I would like the same respect as I don't share their opinions. VOTE SMART |
I remember very recently on this website many of you saying to analyze the content of a message and not the author.
Now those very same people are on here attacking the author without giving any thought to the message. Your personal feelings towards the author doesn't diminish the validity of the facts she puts forward. You don't have to agree or disagree but it is no different than the NO letters written by Rich, Gavin, and the daily emails we now get from Val. Both sides of the debate have a right to express their views as long as they are not attacking people personally...which seems to be very difficult for the NO side to do. |
Originally Posted by bedrock
(Post 1610521)
|
Originally Posted by clearprop
(Post 1610610)
Your avatar and her would make pretty babies.
|
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1610590)
I remember very recently on this website many of you saying to analyze the content of a message and not the author.
Now those very same people are on here attacking the author without giving any thought to the message. Your personal feelings towards the author doesn't diminish the validity of the facts she puts forward. You don't have to agree or disagree but it is no different than the NO letters written by Rich, Gavin, and the daily emails we now get from Val. Both sides of the debate have a right to express their views as long as they are not attacking people personally...which seems to be very difficult for the NO side to do. She is incorrect in her statements and she omited writing the cons of the agreement. |
she is a paid consultant with a paid for blog. independent view depends on who writes her a check.
|
Originally Posted by seafeye
(Post 1610669)
If she is a journalist she should check her facts and not be biased.
She is incorrect in her statements and she omited writing the cons of the agreement. I agree that it didn't mention any potential downside...but none of the letters we get from Val, Rich, or any of the NO letters ever acknowledge any of the TA's positives. |
She is totally a Yes Shill
Really a paid blogger who worked for AA is "Not a Shill?" What's that saying about a duck? I hear allot of quacking going on!
VOTE NO!!!! |
IMHO - As a former AE guy, the vote will not even be close to 95% no and it may even pass by a significant majority. In my history, you can't find anyone who voted yes in a TA that passes by 80%.
I am not pushing either way, just saying. Good Luck either way. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:37 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands