Take your yes crap and shove it up your a**.

At least I know my no vote cancels your yes vote out.

LMAO @ "independent view"

You have to be kidding.

They can't just "not hire a single PSA guy". Our contract isn't for interviews, it's for jobs.

Of course violating the contract is not out of the question but that is true with any contract.

Bzzt's scenario is way more likely to happen than yours.

one half the new hire slots are L-eagle with minimum transfer to aa at 20 a month, but the one half slots no filled by L-eagle pilots is owned by said pilots withheld, this is the 824. after the 824 it is 50% of new hires at 25 a month minimum. most of this is due to arbitration and latter is current cba at L-eagle.

PSA gets preferred interview and management decides which 4 per month can have a job at US airways and you can be withheld for up to 12 months with no retroactive seniority of benefits.

I believe that explains both sides as is current.

Psa can be held till year end (ie December) not 12 months. Not that it matters that much.

gotcha rolling 12 months per individual

No, if you are "hired" in November the latest you can go is December of the current year.

If our vote passes the interesting situation will be if only 360 are hired at AA in a year. Contractually that would mean all 360 would be from Eagle but they're also required to hire a portion of PSA guys.

Edit: That probably won't matter til the SLI between AA and US which is going to take an incredibly long time. I doubt my scenario will ever come to pass.

This was addressed on the conference call today. The first 30 AA hires per month have to be from Eagle and/or 100% up to 360.

That takes precedent over PSA's 4 per month. For PSA's 4 to get class dates AA would need to hire over the above numbers. Otherwise Eagle's flow trumps it.

It was specifically said that Eagle's flow made certain people at PSA "very angry" .

For right now isn't the PSA flow to US Airways? So technically this doesn't matter til the SLI is complete.