Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Regional Airlines aren't as safe >

Regional Airlines aren't as safe

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Regional Airlines aren't as safe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2014 | 06:51 PM
  #11  
SeamusTheHound's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 384
Likes: 3
From: 757/767 First Officer
Default

Originally Posted by jumppilot71
According to this "article". Read #2. I ran across this and thought it would be interesting until I read,

"You may go to an airline website and buy a ticket, pull up to its desk at the curb, and get onto an airplane that has a similar name painted on it, but half the time, you’re really on a regional airline. The regionals aren’t held to the same safety standards as the majors: Their pilots aren’t required to have as much training and experience, and the public doesn’t know that." -Captain at a major airline

Where do people get this crap, especially a captain at a major airline, if that really came from a captain at a major?

Read more: 13+ Things Your Pilot Won't Tell You | Reader's Digest
Do you think that the major airlines sub-contract out their flying to the regionals because the regional folks are simply nice people? Follow the money (or lack of it)!
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 06:55 PM
  #12  
sevenforseven's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Prone
Default

Originally Posted by bedrock
Ever heard of Pinnacle 3701 crash? Ever heard of any major US airline crew pulling such a lame azzz stunt?
You mean like landing a 767 on a taxiway?
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 07:04 PM
  #13  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by sevenforseven
You mean like landing a 767 on a taxiway?
you probably should read the CVR of 3701 before trying to make that comparison...
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 07:38 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by block30
Uh oh...you just opened the door to people listing every bone headed thing a major a pilot has done....heeeere we go.
I was about to say. I guarantee you for every regional incident you can recall, we can do the same with the majors, if not twice as much. It isn't a competition and this thread wasn't meant for it to be.
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 08:07 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: e145 fo
Default

Originally Posted by Bartok
Who flys 8 legs a day?
Never flown 8 but 7 leg days were not uncommon at chq pre 117.
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 08:11 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: still here...
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
you probably should read the CVR of 3701 before trying to make that comparison...

That's a good point but to play devils advocate, there was a pretty idiotic happening with SWA at LaGuardia not long ago and it's pretty tough to compare that CVR with any other because..... no one is allowed to see it.

Screw ups happen everywhere - even unimaginably crazy ones.
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 08:17 PM
  #17  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Yeah, you're not going to talk about how great your replacement workers are.

That said, stupid happens at every airline. At NWA we had a crew disciplined for flying over lake Michigan at less than 100 feet, at 300 kts+ on a repo flight once.
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 09:23 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,498
Likes: 506
Default

You mean like landing a 767 on a taxiway?
Depends. I doubt they were calling each other "dudes" on the CVR.


That's a good point but to play devils advocate, there was a pretty idiotic happening with SWA at LaGuardia not long ago and it's pretty tough to compare that CVR with any other because..... no one is allowed to see it.

Screw ups happen everywhere - even unimaginably crazy ones.
Is the NTSB not going to release a transcript of the CVR of SWA at LGA? I thought they were required to. Does it fall under FOIA?
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 09:31 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,498
Likes: 506
Default

I think it is a fair and accurate statement to say regional airlines aren't as safe. It doesn't mean they are UNsafe, it just means it just isn't as safe as the legacy/majors. A huge part of the reason already mentioned is the far greater number of cycles regional pilots go through each day. 4-6 legs per day is common whereas the mainline counterpart may only do 1-3. The likeliness of an accident goes for the higher frequency of takeoff/landings and that is found moreso in the regionals. And of course the accident stats speak for themselves for at least this century. Since 2000, the major pax carriers had one AS MD80 go down, (excluding 9/11 due to terrorist - on purpose), and the AA A300. That's over 14 years so far. The regional comparison on the other hand includes nearly three times as many fatal crashes over the same period. Air Midwest at CLT, Corporate Air at Kirksville, Ocean Chalk near FLL, Comair at LEX, Colgan at BUF. Those are off the top of my head, I may have missed some.
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 10:05 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Is the NTSB not going to release a transcript of the CVR of SWA at LGA? I thought they were required to. Does it fall under FOIA?
The thing about the FOIA...someone has to ask for it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
Envoy Airlines
585
10-09-2014 10:36 AM
PatrickBateman
Envoy Airlines
35
09-11-2014 06:34 AM
Kprc1
Regional
81
02-25-2014 09:28 AM
EWRflyr
Major
14
10-10-2010 10:37 AM
AFPirate
Regional
6
11-26-2007 11:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices