Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
What is the purpose of the 1,500 hour rule? >

What is the purpose of the 1,500 hour rule?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

What is the purpose of the 1,500 hour rule?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2014 | 08:53 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
I'm a fan of the "1500 hour rule' because it raises the bar to applicants, thus narrowing the field of available pilots and making us a more valuable commodity. It's interesting that doctors have been mentioned, since the AMA has been doing this for years by controlling medical school admissions.

As for the Colgan tragedy, some of you are talking like the CA went straight from a Seminole to the left seat of a Q400. He had airline experience as both a Captain and First Officer. The problem was fatigue among both pilots due to improper commuting which led to poor judgement and mistakes by BOTH of them. Yes, more experience may have helped, but when people commute on a redeye, sleep in crew lounges, then fly all day, it doesn't matter how many hours you have, you're going to screw up. So the "1500 hour rule" IMO adds little to safety, it was a convenient excuse to raise the bar.

As a side note, we have had many 1500 hour applicants recently struggling through training where 300 hour ERAU wonders used to make it through with no problems. Hours aren't everything.
Very good post. Fatigue has been compared to being intoxicated, and it affects decision making accordingly. Additionally I might ask, what was the pilot doing to acquire the 1500 hours? I mean was the majority of his or her experience flying around the local airport, or was their experience more extensive than that? Let's face it, we don't get the experience with thunderstorms, wind shear, ice, or contaminated runways and such as a flight instructor. That's where the 121 training comes into play, and in my opinion the FAA didn't do their job in monitoring Colgan
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 08:57 AM
  #32  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,137
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
Flight training expenses have gone up significantly and many of those old 135 jobs are almost impossible to find now, so it's not a fair comparison to bring up the old de facto mins.
No, they're not impossible to find by any means, you just need 1200 hours like always...and you need to be able to fly your way out of a wet paper bag too.

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
The only reliable time building job these days is flight instructing, but you need more people on the bottom starting their training than at the top teaching for it to work. It's essentially a pyramid scheme, and I'm not sure we can sustain it. A big reason we've been able to so far is foreign students.
This is true in a sense but it's not a pyramid scheme exactly. It depends essentially on a five-for-one replacement. Each CFI needs 1500 hours...start with 300, so you need 1200 dual given. If each student needs about 200 hours dual, that's six CPL/CFI students to support one working CFI through 1500 hours. That's obviously not sustainable, and would only be temporarily viable during periods of massive regional hiring and interest in aviation careers (late 90's, early-mid 2000's?)

But foreign training demand isn't going away soon, and at least half of my dual given was for private, ie non-career, pilots.

The foreigners could take their training home, but in many cases it will always be cheaper to come to the US than to re-engineer their local regulations and build a non-existant GA infrastructure...we're not just talking about buying a few skyhawks, we're talking about building airports...

If the foreigners do go home and GA continues to wither, then the day may come where the airlines face a real pilot shortage. First they'll dramatically downsize the regionals; lifer captains will be unemployed because they have no one to sling gear for them. But since the whole point of regionals is cheap labor, the industry will not start subsidizing primary flight training just to keep regionals alive.

If there is ever actually a looming shortage of applicants for MAJOR airline jobs, then the majors will start looking at scholarships or even ab-initio type programs...but we're a very long way from that.

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
As someone else pointed out, they'll start flying a widebody at 250 hours while you're still slaving away in a 172 with no air conditioning in the summer for minimum wage.
Google Air Crash Investigation...numerous episodes about recent crashes of non-US airliners due to basic airmanship issues.

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
To add insult to injury, we're training our future competition.
They typically get paid more than we do. They're not going to competing with us any time soon as labor, although the quality product of some overseas carriers could attract international travellers who are fed up with the abuse of US majors.

Cabotage is not coming to the US in the foreseeable future, there are too many security concerns (some of which are legit).
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 09:15 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,284
Likes: 103
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
If your captain dies in the cockpit, it's just you, hence reason for dual PIC type ratings, etc.
Really? So in the instances BEFORE FO's got a type, EVEN the SIC, how did they ever handle the plane when the CA died? (roll eyes)
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 09:18 AM
  #34  
bedrock's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
From: ERJ, CA
Default

The reason for the 1500 hr rule, is because the families of Colgan 3407 lobbied hard and exposed that the airlines would not regulate themselves and that there was too much back scratching between the FAA and the airlines which they supposedly regulate--which was shown on the "Chuck Colgan is friend of the FAA testimony". The politicians did try to avoid raising the requiremnts, but the families would not let the issue die. They followed the lawmakers around, brought a lot of heat on them. Prior to this, MESA was actually hiring 250 hr pilots for a short time.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 09:24 AM
  #35  
PilotJ3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,867
Likes: 117
Default

Originally Posted by bedrock
The reason for the 1500 hr rule, is because the families of Colgan 3407 lobbied hard and exposed that the airlines would not regulate themselves and that there was too much back scratching between the FAA and the airlines which they supposedly regulate--which was shown on the "Chuck Colgan is friend of the FAA testimony". The politicians did try to avoid raising the requiremnts, but the families would not let the issue die. They followed the lawmakers around, brought a lot of heat on them. Prior to this, MESA was actually hiring 250 hr pilots for a short time.
Eagle was hiring 250hr pilots in 2008. They went back to 1,000hrs in 2010 and lower it again to 500 in 2011.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 09:30 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bedrock
The reason for the 1500 hr rule, is because the families of Colgan 3407 lobbied hard and exposed that the airlines would not regulate themselves and that there was too much back scratching between the FAA and the airlines which they supposedly regulate--which was shown on the "Chuck Colgan is friend of the FAA testimony". The politicians did try to avoid raising the requiremnts, but the families would not let the issue die. They followed the lawmakers around, brought a lot of heat on them. Prior to this, MESA was actually hiring 250 hr pilots for a short time.
My point exactly, the real negligence here is lies with the FAA. How in the world did they get away with it?
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 10:31 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Brand X
The purpose of the 1500hr rule is to keep people like YOU away from the airlines until you know *** you are doing in an airplane, which generally just STARTS at around 1500hrs.

Now go and continue to instruct while you pay off your $200K of student loans to the Harvard of the skies.
Toolbag quote of the day.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 10:35 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
Very good post. Fatigue has been compared to being intoxicated, and it affects decision making accordingly. Additionally I might ask, what was the pilot doing to acquire the 1500 hours? I mean was the majority of his or her experience flying around the local airport, or was their experience more extensive than that? Let's face it, we don't get the experience with thunderstorms, wind shear, ice, or contaminated runways and such as a flight instructor. That's where the 121 training comes into play, and in my opinion the FAA didn't do their job in monitoring Colgan
3407 was not a question of judgement. It was a pilot who pulled the yoke into his gut when the stall warning system went off and then held it there.

That is EXACTLY what some time spent in a non-airline enviroment would have not taught him not to do -- no matter how little sleep he had. In fact "taught" is a poor word, "burned into his soul" would be a better term.

We are a product of our experiance, and that experiance should be deeper than a mud puddle when step into our first 121 job.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 10:45 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by 742Dash
3407 was not a question of judgement. It was a pilot who pulled the yoke into his gut when the stall warning system went off and then held it there.
That sounds correct for a tail stall recovery, could have just been a misdiagnosis.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 10:53 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Karma
That sounds correct for a tail stall recovery, could have just been a misdiagnosis.
to me, that sounds like a guy shutting down the left engine with a right engine fire and then saying "that sounds correct for a left engine fire could have just been a misdiagnosis"
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
PearlPilot
Flight Schools and Training
118
02-03-2014 10:11 AM
172 Captain
Regional
35
12-14-2012 08:30 AM
VIIPILOT
Regional
266
05-08-2012 05:48 AM
resetjet
Major
151
04-27-2011 11:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices