Turboprops: Making a Comeback?
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 741
I have to believe it's far more complicated than unit cost to operate. For instance, is customer demand low in a certain market for turboprops? I have flown with many passengers who claim to refuse to fly on them. Of course, I don't know how a price drop would affect that rationale. I'm sure it's possible that certain regionals offer to fly certain routes at risk versus FFD.
Most of their neighbors won't be booking anything, because they have zero discretional income.
#22
I agree with most of your statements.
Especially this one...
The Q400 is a nice aircraft from a pilots perspective, being fast and all. However, if you want fast, why not operate a jet? Is a comparable RJ that much thirstier?
The Q300 uses very little fuel and gets 50 people to the hub. No 50 seat jet can compete with it economically on short sectors. I would not say the same about the Q400.
The Q400 is not a comparable replacement for the Q300/Saab 340/ATR and the respective markets.
I guess the trend will go towards larger regional jets (Embraer, Cseries) to keep unit costs low. Markets that do not support these planes will probably not support a Q400 as well.
Especially this one...
The Q300 uses very little fuel and gets 50 people to the hub. No 50 seat jet can compete with it economically on short sectors. I would not say the same about the Q400.
The Q400 is not a comparable replacement for the Q300/Saab 340/ATR and the respective markets.
I guess the trend will go towards larger regional jets (Embraer, Cseries) to keep unit costs low. Markets that do not support these planes will probably not support a Q400 as well.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 783
The casm of an Airbus or Boeing product is becoming more and more of a factor. You could throw a regional on it for .14 casm or do it with a "big" used to be "regional" sized a320 for .08 casm and just focus on filling the damn thing vs providing a flight every hour. Regionals aren't going away but they are going to be a smaller segment of the industry. The pilot pool is drying up and it is going to be mainline or nothing going forward.
#24
Not sure what a Q300 burns but we used to cruise the Q400 at 1150 a side and that would give you about 330 TAS IIRC. I'd have to imagine a Q300 is not much less than that and significantly slower. Horizon Q400's hold 76 people on top of it so there's no doubt that Alaska is making loads of money off these things.
#25
Not sure what a Q300 burns but we used to cruise the Q400 at 1150 a side and that would give you about 330 TAS IIRC. I'd have to imagine a Q300 is not much less than that and significantly slower. Horizon Q400's hold 76 people on top of it so there's no doubt that Alaska is making loads of money off these things.
Yes a Q300 burns that on take off. At cruise at about 260 TAS we burn around 700 a side.
ATR decided to not make there 600 series fast like the q400. They felt there plane was for 1-1.5 segments and the extra fuel wasn't worth it.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Just a city boy, born and raised in south Detroit
Posts: 108
Not sure what a Q300 burns but we used to cruise the Q400 at 1150 a side and that would give you about 330 TAS IIRC. I'd have to imagine a Q300 is not much less than that and significantly slower. Horizon Q400's hold 76 people on top of it so there's no doubt that Alaska is making loads of money off these things.
#29
weekends off? Nope...
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,941
Props are for boats! ;-)
Air Canada plane crash lands and propeller slices Christina Kurylo's HEAD | Daily Mail Online
Air Canada plane crash lands and propeller slices Christina Kurylo's HEAD | Daily Mail Online
#30
Props are for boats! ;-)
Air Canada plane crash lands and propeller slices Christina Kurylo's HEAD | Daily Mail Online
Air Canada plane crash lands and propeller slices Christina Kurylo's HEAD | Daily Mail Online
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post