Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

TSA Yep

Old 11-12-2014 | 06:56 AM
  #91  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Everything here sounds very interesting. I hope it's true for them waterski guys!
Old 11-12-2014 | 07:02 AM
  #92  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Why would your source violate an NDA? Seems way too far fetched to me.
I would think it be obvious. They're going to use that rumor to staff the 36 new planes, since only a handful of new hires will see the upgrade. Standard regional hiring tactic.

Last edited by ArcherDvr; 11-12-2014 at 07:16 AM.
Old 11-12-2014 | 07:19 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,531
Likes: 1,128
Default

Originally Posted by ArcherDvr
I would think it be obvious. They're going to use that rumor to staff the 36 new planes, since only a handful of new hires will see the upgrade. Standard regional hiring tactic.
Archer ANGRY! Do you also doubt the moon landing and think aliens are being bred under DIA?
Old 11-12-2014 | 07:25 AM
  #94  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ArcherDvr
I would think it be obvious. They're going to use that rumor to staff the 36 new planes, since only a handful of new hires will see the upgrade. Standard regional hiring tactic.
Right. For a standard round of hiring. Takes 2 to pilot an aircraft. They can't all be captains. Bitter, party of 1.....
Old 11-12-2014 | 07:38 AM
  #95  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Dukeuno
Hey quick question did your source actually say you all would be getting XRs? I am curious because I was told that the XRs are actually our profitable aircraft and they and that we ( XJT) would not be losing them any time soon. Now I could see you all getting some more of the unprofitable aircraft that we are parking. We are parking around 100 of them. I think it would all be contingent on how well you all can staff the ones you are getting. Right now I figure you all are looking at hiring around 360 to 400 pilots if all the aircraft coming our add planes and not replace any. That means you would double in size. That is a lot of guys to get through training in a year, but it is possible. Plus that is without attrition which I think you guys are losing guys as well.

All of XJT's aircraft are unprofitable thanks to the CPA Skywest negotiated.
Old 11-12-2014 | 08:20 AM
  #96  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ArcherDvr
I would think it be obvious. They're going to use that rumor to staff the 36 new planes, since only a handful of new hires will see the upgrade. Standard regional hiring tactic.
TSA doesn't need to start rumors to staff doubling the fleet. 36 new aircraft is going to take somewhere in the neighborhood of 180-200 captains factoring in attrition over the 18 months. Our most junior captain isn't on the seniority list yet. If you go by active line pilots.

Math really isn't one of your strong areas is it? I bet doing those RNAV arrivals with no VNAV was a real brain buster for you wasn't it?
Old 11-12-2014 | 08:36 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ArcherDvr
I would think it be obvious. They're going to use that rumor to staff the 36 new planes, since only a handful of new hires will see the upgrade. Standard regional hiring tactic.
Maybe if you didn't get yourself fired, you would see an upgrade soon.
Old 11-12-2014 | 08:45 AM
  #98  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MavAv8r
TSA doesn't need to start rumors to staff doubling the fleet. 36 new aircraft is going to take somewhere in the neighborhood of 180-200 captains factoring in attrition over the 18 months. Our most junior captain isn't on the seniority list yet. If you go by active line pilots.

Math really isn't one of your strong areas is it? I bet doing those RNAV arrivals with no VNAV was a real brain buster for you wasn't it?
I know your most junior captain isn't on the seniority list yet, that why I said a handful of new hires will see the quick upgrade.
My math is fine.
You're doubling your fleet, so pretty much all FOs on property that have the time will upgrade.
Those that don't have the time I imagine would displace any CQFOs as they get the time. (Don't know if I'm a hundred percent correct on that one.)
As for attrition, in order for attrition to help with the quick upgrade, the attrition has to come from the Captain side. You know better than I do how many of your captains are lifers.

Eventually you'll have to start hiring people who are ok with flying in the right seat for a few years, unless the majors open the flood gates and a large part of your captains leave, or the majors hire a bunch of FOs, which they are hiring some.

Plus you'll have to compete with the likes of Mesa and PSA who also advertise the quick upgrade, have all 70+ aircraft (except for PSA's 200's). And PSA offers the preferential interview.

I was half joking about using that rumor to hire for the 36 planes. But you can't even tell me these companies haven't pulled crap like this in the past, I've heard it over and over again from captains.

I hope the flood gates open, I hope the DOW never drops below 10,000, and that oil continues to drop, and that you guys, are able to ride the top of this whipsaw wave to a more secure job. My issue isn't with regional pilots, but with how mainline and regional mgt has treated us in the past. It's changing now because the numbers are on our side for the moment.
Old 11-12-2014 | 08:47 AM
  #99  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ArcherDvr
I know your most junior captain isn't on the seniority list yet, that why I said a handful of new hires will see the quick upgrade.
My math is fine.
You're doubling your fleet, so pretty much all FOs on property that have the time will upgrade.
Those that don't have the time I imagine would displace any CQFOs as they get the time. (Don't know if I'm a hundred percent correct on that one.)
As for attrition, in order for attrition to help with the quick upgrade, the attrition has to come from the Captain side. You know better than I do how many of your captains are lifers.

Eventually you'll have to start hiring people who are ok with flying in the right seat for a few years, unless the majors open the flood gates and a large part of your captains leave, or the majors hire a bunch of FOs, which they are hiring some.

Plus you'll have to compete with the likes of Mesa and PSA who also advertise the quick upgrade, have all 70+ aircraft (except for PSA's 200's). And PSA offers the preferential interview.

I was half joking about using that rumor to hire for the 36 planes. But you can't even tell me these companies haven't pulled crap like this in the past, I've heard it over and over again from captains.

I hope the flood gates open, I hope the DOW never drops below 10,000, and that oil continues to drop, and that you guys, are able to ride the top of this whipsaw wave to a more secure job. My issue isn't with regional pilots, but with how mainline and regional mgt has treated us in the past. It's changing now because the numbers are on our side for the moment.

It's about time some logic comes out in a post. This would be correct all the way down to having to replace the CQFO's.
Old 11-12-2014 | 08:49 AM
  #100  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Riverside
Maybe if you didn't get yourself fired, you would see an upgrade soon.
You're right. And I wish I hadn't been fired, but not so I can upgrade at TSA, but so I didn't have it on my record. Instead of just resigning early on, I choose to handle my issues with TSA differently. Fortunately, I will see an upgrade soon enough.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
ANGFDX
Cargo
41
02-02-2012 11:48 AM
Qotsaautopilot
Hangar Talk
8
12-19-2011 11:52 AM
N9373M
Major
187
12-16-2010 02:44 PM
Foxcow
Regional
200
09-13-2009 09:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices