Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ERJ vs CRJ?

Old 03-04-2015 | 10:48 AM
  #21  
Moonwolf's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 21
From: Sleeping
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The real question comes down to pay, location, and schedule which all depends on the airline in question. ERJ probably pays more than 200, but will be more senior.
.
No erj operator pays more than AWAC on the lonely old 200.

To add to what comrcap said its down to $$$.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 10:59 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by Moonwolf
No erj operator pays more than AWAC on the lonely old 200.

To add to what comrcap said its down to $$$.
True, but I'd rather live in base for an ERJ operator than commute anywhere else.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 11:02 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: CL65
Default

Originally Posted by TallFlyer
True, but I'd rather live in base for an ERJ operator than commute anywhere else.
True. The money and time saved by living in base equals far more than a couple of dollars an hour in pay.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 11:57 AM
  #24  
TeddyKGB's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: 7er
Default

Either way you are flying an RJ for peanuts. Go where you will have the best QOL. If money over the next few years is crucial then 9E would be worth looking into as they are by far the best starting regional pay.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 12:17 PM
  #25  
Fegelein's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kfahmi
Take whatever job lets you live in base and never commute. I honestly don't know how commuters do it long-term.

As for the airplanes, the CRJ (even the -200), when compared to the 135/145, is wider, heavier, and gets fewer 'OMG this is a tiny airplane deathtrap' comments from pax. And while the -200's overhead bins are tiny, I can still stuff my rollaboard in them, whereas I can hardly even fit my little crew cooler in the overheads on a 145.

The CRJ 7 and 9 are in a completely different league, weight and performance wise. The 900 is large enough that pax think it's a 'real' airplane, and the -700 actually has an excess of power, to the point that you often have to manually limit the climb rate above FL300 so it doesn't exceed the pressurization system's ability to catch up. There is simply no comparison between the 7/9 and a 145.

The ERJ175, on the other hand, has specs very close to the -900. Passengers love it, and the interior beats the CRJ hands down. I've never flown the airplane so can't comment on the flying characteristics aside from what you already know (it's the only RJ with autothrottles, etc.)

Again, though, choose the job and QOL first. Airframe should be the last deciding factor.
Another plus for the "9" is that you have to use judgmental oversteering. Just like a heavy! And you get to wear your epaulettes upside down so that lesser RJ drivers can tell that you are an oversteerer.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 12:47 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Default

I like to think every time I see a 200 over steer they are just doing it to be funny.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 01:02 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Default

Sweet baby jesus are you guys a ratard? What RJ is better? What airplane look the kewlest on my instagram?

"Chicks are too dumb to realize United Express isn't really United."

Engines under the wings? Is this airliners.net? Get a grip.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 01:04 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RV5M
Embraer is growing and Bombardier is struggling. The E170 type might be more advantageous for future opportunities, especially if you're interested in working abroad. Also, the 170/190 type allows you to go to a mainline operator "pre-typed".


This is a gem right here. ELOHEL. Wowza.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 01:09 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fegelein
Definitely! It's more like a mainliner than an RJ.
Who cares what it's more "like", the fact that a regional FO's 1st year take home pay to fly the Brazilian space shuttle is less than what Delta gave in profit sharing alone to two of the guys who dumped the lav on the damn thing. Those are the things that matter.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 02:24 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FaceBiter
Who cares what it's more "like", the fact that a regional FO's 1st year take home pay to fly the Brazilian space shuttle is less than what Delta gave in profit sharing alone to two of the guys who dumped the lav on the damn thing. Those are the things that matter.
I was hoping for more from you. That wasn't a full swing, come on maaaaan.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM
Mason32
Regional
277
07-27-2010 06:01 PM
saab2000
Regional
46
11-27-2007 02:35 PM
supercell86
Regional
46
04-22-2006 08:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices