![]() |
Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
(Post 1873951)
Because there are so many white males, lots of white males don't "make it", so they assume the reason they don't make it is because they are white males. If cockpits were made up of something other than predominately white males, this all might mean something...
|
Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
(Post 1873951)
Because there are so many white males, lots of white males don't "make it", so they assume the reason they don't make it is because they are white males. If cockpits were made up of something other than predominately white males, this all might mean something...
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1874695)
When 100% of females are being hired even with minimal experience and 80% of white males are "not making it," doesn't that seem a little discriminatory?
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1874695)
When 100% of females are being hired even with minimal experience and 80% of white males are "not making it," doesn't that seem a little discriminatory?
|
Or you could pull a Bruce Jenner and say that you identify as a woman. Worth a shot right? ;)
|
Originally Posted by sarahswhere
(Post 1874783)
Talk to Angie at Cage Consulting. 100% of females are not getting hired. Appearances can be deceiving.
|
Originally Posted by Sliceback
(Post 1874804)
WAI - female hiring is twice the percentage of the population pool. If it's just about resumes would the percentage be 200% of expected?
|
Originally Posted by sarahswhere
(Post 1874807)
That doesn't make sense.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1874842)
Yes it does. If there are 20% female pilots and they make up 40% of major new hires, they are being hired at twice the rate or double or 200%
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1874842)
Yes it does. If there are 20% female pilots and they make up 40% of major new hires, they are being hired at twice the rate or double or 200%
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands