RAH 175 options
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 219
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Emb 170/175 FO
Posts: 272
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 516
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 219
If RAH doesn't exercise any of its AA 175 options then that would allow 50 large RJ's to be operated at another carrier without scooping out.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,152
I think my response was misunderstood. There's been a lot of talk of the Large Regional Jets being scooped out, unless the CRJ 700's are reconfigured. My point is that included in those Large Jet orders that are scooping out Envoy is the 50 E175s that are supposed to go to RAH.
If RAH doesn't exercise any of its AA 175 options then that would allow 50 large RJ's to be operated at another carrier without scooping out.
If RAH doesn't exercise any of its AA 175 options then that would allow 50 large RJ's to be operated at another carrier without scooping out.
#of options doesn't equal the # of permitted aircraft. (Hint: it's way more than what is permitted.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post