Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PDT Flow Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2015 | 07:32 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RegionalFO
Training can't handle the flow to go up quickly. All the ads are based on getting more people on property to increase flow numbers. There's no way 1 dash 8 sim and 1 e-145 sim can handle an airline to double in size in a year. People here for 7-8 years are still looking at over 2 years to flow.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We using 2 dash sim atm.
Reply
Old 07-18-2015 | 07:37 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Default

Oops forgot about that one. Still it's piedmont and anybody that works here knows that we are always way behind the curve.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 07-18-2015 | 07:56 AM
  #13  
Lvlng4Spd's Avatar
Happy at PDT
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 CA
Default

Originally Posted by flyviper
We using 2 dash sim atm.
We will also add 145 sims as needed. When they have had backlogs in the past they have had up to 3 dash sims running, including one out in SEA if I remember correctly. AAL was more than willing to give us $1 million in additional sim time in Toronto for the Dash recently to prevent delays. Why would they not finance additional units and/or locations to ramp up 145 training? I don't think you will see the PSA-style logjams, because we don't need to grow as quickly and that is OK.
Reply
Old 07-18-2015 | 08:18 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RegionalFO
Oops forgot about that one. Still it's piedmont and anybody that works here knows that we are always way behind the curve.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I totally understand where you coming from, it's been downsizing ever since I got here too...with that being said I also feel pretty good about my position here at pdt now. We finally have a hub base and potential career at aag.

Regarding behind the curve, it can be said for about 90% of the airlines.
Reply
Old 07-18-2015 | 09:28 AM
  #15  
billyho's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
Default

Year and a half ago I wouldn't have told anyone to come to Piedmont. Now??? Honestly it's probably one of the best place to come right NOW.
Reply
Old 07-18-2015 | 10:44 AM
  #16  
AZFlyer's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 0
Default

Fleet/Flow related question.

I'm applying in October with hopes for a January class date. My preference is ROA because it will be closest to where I will be living and drivable if need be. This implies being given/selecting the -8 fleet.

My question relates to the 1 year seat lock incurred when changing fleet and the timing of -8 retirements and how that could affect when a JAN2016 hire could possibly flow. If the writing is on the wall that a pilot will be forced off the -8 as the fleet retires but he or she also sees the light at the end of the tunnel for a flow date, I'm wondering if it would be wise for a pilot in this scenario to bid the jet earlier on and avoid being locked past when you could have flowed up to AA?

I'm guessing the -8s will be gone or nearly gone before this would be a realistic concern for me. Just curious what others think.
Reply
Old 07-18-2015 | 11:15 AM
  #17  
Cujo665's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 48
From: Semi-Retired...
Default

Originally Posted by billyho
Year and a half ago I wouldn't have told anyone to come to Piedmont. Now??? Honestly it's probably one of the best place to come right NOW.
Probably a very true statement.

The same could have been said about PSA pre August 2013, compared to the past year.

Remember that when you talk about envoy in the coming months. If they fix the QOL issues - which are currently being negotiated - the rest will likely fall into place pretty much as their plan has done at the other two WO's.
Reply
Old 07-18-2015 | 01:20 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AZFlyer
Fleet/Flow related question.

I'm applying in October with hopes for a January class date. My preference is ROA because it will be closest to where I will be living and drivable if need be. This implies being given/selecting the -8 fleet.

My question relates to the 1 year seat lock incurred when changing fleet and the timing of -8 retirements and how that could affect when a JAN2016 hire could possibly flow. If the writing is on the wall that a pilot will be forced off the -8 as the fleet retires but he or she also sees the light at the end of the tunnel for a flow date, I'm wondering if it would be wise for a pilot in this scenario to bid the jet earlier on and avoid being locked past when you could have flowed up to AA?

I'm guessing the -8s will be gone or nearly gone before this would be a realistic concern for me. Just curious what others think.
There is no lock if you are displaced. The flow lockout is only if you voluntarily upgrade or bid into a different aircraft.
Reply
Old 07-18-2015 | 01:33 PM
  #19  
AZFlyer's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 0
Default

Good to know. Thanks.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stoki
Regional
11252
04-26-2017 08:03 AM
Smoke Toliet
Major
59
03-24-2011 12:42 PM
forgot to bid
Major
485
04-03-2009 07:34 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
PinnacleFO
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
07-22-2008 04:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices