View Poll Results: Will the RAH TA pass?
YES it will pass with >60% in favor
57
55.88%
Yes it will pass marginally (51% in favor)
22
21.57%
No it will not pass marginally (45% in favor)
11
10.78%
NO it will be struck down with <40% in favor
12
11.76%
Voters: 102. You may not vote on this poll
RAH: Is the vote going to pass?
10-27-2015 | 05:33 PM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
Add to that crap RSV rules, pay that doesn't keep up with inflation. unlimited stipends and training payments to people not on property, questionable scope/seniority list implementation, unilaterally removable improvements to the scheduling section (SAP), and the fact that they proved they can pass a CBA by bypassing the Negotiating Committee and we have a winner.
There is no doubt it is better than current book on FO pay and ratification bonus. As far as scheduling and work rules, it is still insufficient.
Either way, this will be the last CBA at RAH so hopefully the people that voted "yes" enjoy it. I know I won't.
There is no doubt it is better than current book on FO pay and ratification bonus. As far as scheduling and work rules, it is still insufficient.
Either way, this will be the last CBA at RAH so hopefully the people that voted "yes" enjoy it. I know I won't.
10-27-2015 | 06:17 PM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
From: A-320
10-27-2015 | 06:23 PM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Add to that crap RSV rules, pay that doesn't keep up with inflation. unlimited stipends and training payments to people not on property, questionable scope/seniority list implementation, unilaterally removable improvements to the scheduling section (SAP), and the fact that they proved they can pass a CBA by bypassing the Negotiating Committee and we have a winner.
There is no doubt it is better than current book on FO pay and ratification bonus. As far as scheduling and work rules, it is still insufficient.
Either way, this will be the last CBA at RAH so hopefully the people that voted "yes" enjoy it. I know I won't.
There is no doubt it is better than current book on FO pay and ratification bonus. As far as scheduling and work rules, it is still insufficient.
Either way, this will be the last CBA at RAH so hopefully the people that voted "yes" enjoy it. I know I won't.
10-28-2015 | 05:56 AM
#47
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 698
Likes: 12
From: A-320
Well you're source is wrong.
100% Leg-by-leg cancellation pay
1:4 Trip Rig
1:2 Duty Rig
4:12 Min Day
Health caps at 25 or 35% depending on which insurance and the HDHP is frozen for 2 years and is limited to a 10% annual increase after this period. I believe our traditional plan is also limited to a 10% increase YOY.
All protections the old CBA didn't have.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
100% Leg-by-leg cancellation pay
1:4 Trip Rig
1:2 Duty Rig
4:12 Min Day
Health caps at 25 or 35% depending on which insurance and the HDHP is frozen for 2 years and is limited to a 10% annual increase after this period. I believe our traditional plan is also limited to a 10% increase YOY.
All protections the old CBA didn't have.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10-28-2015 | 06:54 AM
#48
New Hire
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Hmmm
I voted no. Won't trade QOL for dollars. This contract is aimed at getting people here, and I doubt it will work without some sort of flow through agreement. Rumors are going around here about that being in the works however. One thing I have yet to figure out: why are there now CRJ 200, 700, and 900 rates? Yes, that is correct..we now have those rates in our new contract....And the company has 'broke ground' (if you want to call it that) on a brand new training facility here in good ole Indianapolis. Rumor also has it they paid cash for it and it was already in the works long before we voted on this TA.
10-28-2015 | 07:21 AM
#49
Banned
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
