Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
It's official Q400's for Colgan! >

It's official Q400's for Colgan!

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

It's official Q400's for Colgan!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2007, 06:15 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,576
Default

I flew 64-68 seat ATR-72's for Continental Express. It paid less than the ERJ even though it had less seats. It sounds like you guys want paid more for more seats, but the industry always puts turbo-props below jets. The ATR was a lot more complex than the ERJ. It's funny when Continental got rid of the ATR's for jets, they said they did it because passengers didn't like props. Now they are going right back to them? They did it in CLE, then IAH, and now EWR. So much for the "all jet fleet" for Continental passengers.

Do you want to hear what I got paid to fly a 68 seat aircraft? Contract '95 paid $26/hour for the ATR. That's captain pay, not first officer ($12/hr). The best way to increase your pay is to get out of the regionals as soon as you can. Good luck to all those trying. I wish there was more hiring going on.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 02-05-2007, 07:35 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Default

Originally Posted by BCDurbin
The idea is 5 crew/aircraft. 15*2*5=150 (minimum; really you need about 7-8crew/AC), I didn't factor in anything else. And you are right - F/O's will stay for the Q, but if they don't pay double what I am making now - I won't even consider staying let alone transitioning.
FYI Colgan is currently staffed @ 3 crews (6 pilots) per aircraft, so you are predicting they will double the staffing with the addition of 25% more aircraft?

Interesting math.

My bet is staffing will stay the same or slightly increase, maybe to 7 pilots per aircraft. Colgan runs a slim operation.
fosters is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 05:03 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dingo222's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 555
Default

not all planes are staffed at 3 to 1. Most are staffed at 4 to 1. THat's still pretty slim. BCD is right i believe. THey will need more crews for the Q's than they previously used. From the conference call, it sounds like they will be hub based, so I'm sure we will have some ppl sitting reserve at EWR. THey don't want to take the chance of not flying the plane because a crew wasn't avail. It also means close to another hundred or so FA's. As far as pay, horizon is the gold standard for this aircraft for pay. I'm sure we won't see that. I bet it will be closer to what pcl pilots get paid now on the crj. Even if we had a union now, it takes a long time for a contract to get ratified. Historically, the first contract sucks anyhow. I'm going to speculate here, but I bet the pay will be a touch better than we are thinking, so that mgmt can try to keep the union off of the property. Or, maybe they will lowball it and just wait for contract negotiations in a yr and a half from now. Who knows
dingo222 is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 05:05 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Saab
Posts: 100
Default

Staffing is 4 to 1 and at my base 5 to 1. No way it is 3 to 1.
George Dubya is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 07:41 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
STR8NLVL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 411
Default

What George said. I've got the seniority list in front of me right now. It's a solid 4 to 1. Slightly more at some bases, like Houston.

That being said, I'm just quoting Chuck Jr on the 250 number, and he does the hiring. Obviously, some of the 250 will be for attrition.

6 saabs + 15 Q's = 21 planes X 8 = 168

They've been losing 5-6 captains a month plus the fo's that have been leaving. I think the fo attrition will slow, but the captains will continue to move on to better jobs. But that's another 60-70. That puts you somewhere close to that 250 new hire number.

250 hired, with an increase in total pilots of about 150-170.
STR8NLVL is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 10:11 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Colgan is one of the most poorly run regionals, go figure Larry the Bean Counter is going to use them for the 74 seat flying, cant wait to see what you guys are going to be paid
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 11:01 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BCDurbin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: 717 FO >>>> 737 FO
Posts: 295
Default

Originally Posted by fosters
FYI Colgan is currently staffed @ 3 crews (6 pilots) per aircraft, so you are predicting they will double the staffing with the addition of 25% more aircraft?

Interesting math.

My bet is staffing will stay the same or slightly increase, maybe to 7 pilots per aircraft. Colgan runs a slim operation.
I'm not predicting anything - we have 5 Capts in ORF and 4 F/O's we only need 4 because we have a check-airman that usually gets a IOE - I was merely stating what I think is a good level of crews/AC
BCDurbin is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 01:38 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Originally Posted by BCDurbin
I'm not predicting anything - we have 5 Capts in ORF and 4 F/O's we only need 4 because we have a check-airman that usually gets a IOE - I was merely stating what I think is a good level of crews/AC
hahaah Jack still around hehehe
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 02:19 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyguyniner11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 765
Default

Originally Posted by George Dubya
Staffing is 4 to 1 and at my base 5 to 1. No way it is 3 to 1.
JHW is 3-1
flyguyniner11 is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 02:42 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
Colgan is one of the most poorly run regionals, go figure Larry the Bean Counter is going to use them for the 74 seat flying, cant wait to see what you guys are going to be paid
Saab, do the captain that fly with you like you?

You're just a flat-out di*ckhead.
DMEarc is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HIREME
Regional
2
01-27-2007 07:14 PM
BusDriverPNW
Regional
2
01-19-2007 10:48 AM
stanrhintx
Regional
2
12-22-2006 05:55 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
05-19-2005 05:48 PM
CRM1337
Hiring News
7
04-25-2005 07:03 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices