Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
How are we going to get rid of the RLA? >

How are we going to get rid of the RLA?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

How are we going to get rid of the RLA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2016 | 03:43 PM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer

If RJ flying becomes too expensive, how will become cheaper at mainline? It won't.

GF
Gee I guess they'll just have to fly larger airplanes.
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 03:59 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
If RJ flying becomes too expensive, how will become cheaper at mainline? It won't.

GF
No, it won't, but as pilot pay for regional aircraft continues to increase it makes less sense to maintain an entire company infrastructure outside of what already exists inside of a mainline carrier, hence it becoming cheaper to operate the aircraft in house.

Delta already has rates in its current contract for CRJ900s, and they're a lot more than what Endeavor guys currently get, even with the retention bonuses.
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 04:10 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,567
Likes: 229
From: UNA
Default

It seems to me the problem is not with the RLA but rather with mediators not recognizing an impasse. I was under the impression that if two parties did not agree after mediation that the mediator was supposed to release both sides to self help. In the last 15 years most airlines have worked under one expired contract or another for several years. To me it seems that the reason airlines have historically been able to get better contracts was because the mediators back then understood an impasse and would release both sides rather that let groups work for years under an expired CBA. I could be wrong, I have not been in aviation that long, so I do not know if that is actually the case
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 04:21 PM
  #54  
deltajuliet's Avatar
Living the Dream
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

I think you're right about mediators, and fixing what they've become would be another big win.

Originally Posted by 272922
And again, slow downs, sick outs, everyone writing up everything in outstations, everyone all of a sudden SAPing to 65, etc, beyond the established status quo can be construed as an illegal job action and will be met with action in Federal Court. Your union leaders would bear the brunt of it, and also has the responsibility of stopping it.

But instead, you could just pull your head out of your posterior and realize that the current market forces are most likely going to get you want, and you can avoid the whole sending your MEC to Federal Court thing.

But that wouldn't be as cool, I know.
I hear what you're saying, but even if there was a sudden and dramatic uptick in outstation write-ups, what's the company going to claim, that pilots shouldn't be writing up mx issues? Don't we have a legal obligation to do so? Maybe the planes are just getting older and the mechanics aren't maintaining them well. If each individual write-up is individually defendable, I don't think management would have a leg to stand on.
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 04:24 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Day4mx
When teachers, firemen, police, public transportation, garbagemen, EMTs, etc etc can all strike as self help, it's foolish to think a pilot group striking would ruin this country.
Exactly, I doubt our unions would abuse their ability to strike. After all, going on strike is very bad for a company, and that could lead to bankruptcies and generally is not good for business. The risk of a strike to management would definitely bring them to the table unlike now.
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 04:28 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default

Oh, and we would have a chance at ditching the RLA if someone like Bernie Sanders was elected. Otherwise, everyone else protects big business, not the working class.
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 04:33 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
I hear what you're saying, but even if there was a sudden and dramatic uptick in outstation write-ups, what's the company going to claim, that pilots shouldn't be writing up mx issues? Don't we have a legal obligation to do so? Maybe the planes are just getting older and the mechanics aren't maintaining them well. If each individual write-up is individually defendable, I don't think management would have a leg to stand on.
I'm just telling what's been proven in court before. We all know that we could fill up page after page of logbooks with BS writeups. That's the kind of stuff I'm talking about.

Originally Posted by Chupacabras
Exactly, I doubt our unions would abuse their ability to strike. After all, going on strike is very bad for a company, and that could lead to bankruptcies and generally is not good for business. The risk of a strike to management would definitely bring them to the table unlike now.
You're missing the point. The point is that there is a very real risk that opening up the RLA for changes means that a lot of very highly paid lawyers and lobbyists for the airlines are going to be doing their best to insert legislation into it that's most assuredly not in our best interest.
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 07:59 AM
  #58  
SErickson's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: M88B
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
It seems to me the problem is not with the RLA but rather with mediators not recognizing an impasse. I was under the impression that if two parties did not agree after mediation that the mediator was supposed to release both sides to self help. In the last 15 years most airlines have worked under one expired contract or another for several years. To me it seems that the reason airlines have historically been able to get better contracts was because the mediators back then understood an impasse and would release both sides rather that let groups work for years under an expired CBA. I could be wrong, I have not been in aviation that long, so I do not know if that is actually the case
Bingo....The RLA isn't broken. The NMB is.
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 09:40 AM
  #59  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
It seems to me the problem is not with the RLA but rather with mediators not recognizing an impasse.
I'm not at all concerned with what I cannot control. But I am concerned with what I and fellow pilots can directly control. We can apply pressure outside of the union and RLA.
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 09:42 AM
  #60  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
I think you're right about mediators, and fixing what they've become would be another big win.


I hear what you're saying, but even if there was a sudden and dramatic uptick in outstation write-ups, what's the company going to claim, that pilots shouldn't be writing up mx issues? Don't we have a legal obligation to do so? Maybe the planes are just getting older and the mechanics aren't maintaining them well. If each individual write-up is individually defendable, I don't think management would have a leg to stand on.
In any event, none of that is any of our concern. I don't make maintenance or scheduling situations. There job is supply me with an airworthy airplane.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MtEverest
Delta
17
08-01-2015 11:04 AM
Magpuller
Regional
40
08-12-2013 09:45 PM
Oldfreightdawg
Major
24
03-27-2009 02:23 PM
Windsor
Cargo
1
03-27-2009 11:47 AM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
49
10-11-2007 01:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices