Falcon 50 Overrun at KGMU
#1
Falcon 50 Overrun at KGMU
This fatal accident hasn’t made it on the radar, but pretty horrible preliminary report. Crew wasn’t qualified to fly the plane, perhaps anti-skid inoperative.
https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.town...08bc11.pdf.pdf
https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.town...08bc11.pdf.pdf
#2
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,023
It was flown by unqualified, unrated pilots, one of them a private pilot without an instrument rating, who was also the operator of the airplane. The flight was conducted under part 135. The "captain" had only a SIC rating, and the first officer had no rating. The pilot who had been assigned the trip had refused it, due to the condition of the brakes. The operator of the falcon, the private pilot, took the trip as the copilot, and hired an unrated pilot to fly it. From the video it's plain to see the aircraft wasn't slowing when it went off the end. The engines ran for almost 45 minutes after final impact, before fire-rescue was able to gain entry and shut it down.
The operator had a long history of conducting illegal charters.
The operator had a long history of conducting illegal charters.
#3
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 96
It was flown by unqualified, unrated pilots, one of them a private pilot without an instrument rating, who was also the operator of the airplane. The flight was conducted under part 135. The "captain" had only a SIC rating, and the first officer had no rating. The pilot who had been assigned the trip had refused it, due to the condition of the brakes. The operator of the falcon, the private pilot, took the trip as the copilot, and hired an unrated pilot to fly it. From the video it's plain to see the aircraft wasn't slowing when it went off the end. The engines ran for almost 45 minutes after final impact, before fire-rescue was able to gain entry and shut it down.
The operator had a long history of conducting illegal charters.
The operator had a long history of conducting illegal charters.
So the pilot who refused the trip dropped a dime to the FAA and they had someone at KGMU ready to ramp check on arrival
#5
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,023
The operator is a 135 operator, with passengers carried for compensation or hire. Unless the operator happened to be going to that destination and the passengers just tagged along, any flight carrying passengers for compensation or hire (the logging of flight time is considered compensation), then the flight was an illegal charter.
The passengers aren't likely to be particularly generous to the operator or illegal crew, given that this negligence nearly killed them. Standby for the law suit.
The FAA wasn't "standing by," and the pilot didn't "drop a dime."
He had refused the trip, however, due to brakes.
#8
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 96
You say the operator had a long history of illegal charters. Was the FAA powerless to stop that or was he penalized but the the fines were not onerous?
#9
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 4
Very in-depth discussion on this accident here: https://forums.*************.com/sho...0-overrun-KGMU
#10
That was "tongue in cheek" and I wouldn't castigate that pilot for not alerting the FAA as he might not even be aware of the violations and if he was might be reluctant due to possible retaliation in that job market.
You say the operator had a long history of illegal charters. Was the FAA powerless to stop that or was he penalized but the the fines were not onerous?
You say the operator had a long history of illegal charters. Was the FAA powerless to stop that or was he penalized but the the fines were not onerous?
GF
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post