Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
FAA hopes global regulators simultaneously >

FAA hopes global regulators simultaneously

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

FAA hopes global regulators simultaneously

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2019, 12:45 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 330
Default FAA hopes global regulators simultaneously

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-e...-idUSKCN1UP2BB


FAA hopes global regulators simultaneously approve Boeing 737 MAX to fly again
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration hopes civil aviation authorities around the world will decide at about the same time to allow the Boeing 737 MAX to resume flying, the agency told Congress on Tuesday in a letter seen by Reuters.

FILE PHOTO: Grounded Boeing 737 MAX aircraft are seen parked in an aerial photo at Boeing Field in Seattle, Washington, U.S. July 1, 2019. REUTERS/Lindsey Wasson
The FAA and other regulators grounded the plane in March after two fatal crashes in five months killed 346 people.

Acting FAA Administrator Dan Elwell said in letters to Senators Susan Collins and Jack Reed that the agency “hopes to achieve near simultaneous approval from the major civil aviation authorities around the world” but added that every regulator will make its own determination.

“We are working with our colleagues from the European Union, Canada and Brazil to address their concerns,” he wrote.

Collins will chair a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing Wednesday that will feature four senior FAA officials, including Ali Bahrami, who oversees aviation safety.

Boeing Co (BA.N) Chief Executive Dennis Muilenburg told analysts last week he was confident the MAX would be back in service as early as October after a certification flight in “the September time frame.”

Ryan Air (RYA.I) Chief Executive Michael O’Leary said Monday that he had been told that flight would be delayed until October. Boeing on Tuesday reiterated Muilenburg’s recent comments.

Elwell said in his letter the FAA “will lift the 737 MAX grounding order only when it is safe to do so.”

The MAX’s return has been delayed as Chicago-based Boeing works to win approval for reprogrammed stall-prevention software and related training materials.

In late June, the FAA said it had identified a new risk as an agency pilot was running a flight simulator test seeking to intentionally activate the so-called MCAS stall-prevention system.

Boeing has said it is working on a fix to address the problem.

The FAA’s Technical Advisory Board, made up of experts not involved in the original 737 MAX certification, is also reviewing the MCAS software update and training requirements.

The European Aviation Safety Agency sent FAA and Boeing a list of concerns it wanted addressed before the MAX re-enters service, people familiar with the matter said.

Since the crashes, federal prosecutors, the Transportation Department’s inspector general, Congress and several blue-ribbon panels have been investigating how the FAA certifies new aircraft and its longstanding practice of delegating certification tasks to airplane manufacturers.

Elwell noted in his letter that on March 5 he created a new Aviation Safety Organization office on delegating authority. That office is in the process of selecting staff and is developing procedures “to conduct this important mission. No substantive changes to the existing (delegation) program have been made as a result of standing up this office.”

Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Cynthia Osterman
docav8tor is offline  
Old 07-30-2019, 06:43 PM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

They almost assuredly will not.

Some are home to competitors (or hopeful future competitors) and will be in no hurry to buff out boeing's tarnish. Might be mitigated if they have domestic airlines suffering from grounded MAX's.

Many others will want to appear independent since the FAA is no longer assumed to be the gold standard.

Even if the FAA agreed to wait until everyone was ready, there would still be some who would insist on FAA date + at least 60 days.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bilsch
Aviation Law
1
03-16-2017 03:22 AM
vagabond
Safety
2
03-26-2011 10:36 AM
aafurloughee
Fractional
41
06-25-2008 06:43 PM
UnlimitedAkro
Major
60
03-11-2008 12:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices