Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2776351)
This is really what I'm struggling to understand.
In "whiteout" conditions, flying a visual approach, I would almost understand how you land off runway like that. But from an ILS with low visibility? ILS RWY 01 was OTS |
Originally Posted by Cirrusly
(Post 2776451)
”
ILS RWY 01 was OTS That's even more serious, because the weather was way below the minimums for the GPS RNAV 01. |
Yeah looks like they OTS the ils at 1734 on the 4th
|
Originally Posted by Cirrusly
(Post 2776441)
What’s the tower frequency at an uncontrolled airport again???
Don’t believe everything you read on the internet, kids. |
Think the ILS NOTAM was after the fact.
FAA routinely does that to test it for issues. |
Originally Posted by cursesRedBaron
(Post 2776490)
Think the ILS NOTAM was after the fact.
FAA routinely does that to test it for issues. |
The ILS was not NOTAM'd OTS before the incident. And it was the only approach that was legal to shoot at that weather. I think a reasonable conclusion is, that they were shooting the ILS 01.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2776503)
The ILS was not NOTAM'd OTS before the incident. And it was the only approach that was legal to shoot at that weather. I think a reasonable conclusion is, that they were shooting the ILS 01.
They were, first try was a go around. http://pilots.ualforums.com/attachme...id=16501&stc=1 |
Way off the LOC when they broke out.
|
Originally Posted by TJBrass
(Post 2776530)
Way off the LOC when they broke out.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands